Skip to contentUnited States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology: Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

Overview

FHWA Home > Research > POA > Federal Highway Administration Research Project-For more projects go to: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/research/tfhrc/projects/projectsdb > PMSS Project Details

 

PMSS Project Details

 

Project ID:FHWA-PROJ-05-0001
Project Name: Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Transportation Pooled Fund Study
Status: Active
Contact:
Last Name:Amjadi
First Name:Roya
Telephone:202-493-3383
E-mail:roya.amjadi@dot.gov
Office: Office of Safety Research and Development
Team:Safety Data and Analysis Team
Roadmap/Focus area(s): Intersections
Speed Management
Roadway Departure
Comprehensive Approach to Safety
Safety Planning
Safety Data and Analysis
Project Description:To develop reliable crash modification factors (CMFs) for new and innovative low-cost safety improvements that have not been proven. These CMFs are determined by conducting scientifically rigorous before-and-after evaluations at sites in the United States where these strategies are being implemented.  This Transportation Pooled Fund (TPF) Study has 38 Department of Transportation State members, and provides a platform for State members to conduct peer exchange and technology transfer related to low-cost safety countermeasures.  Also, this TPF determines high priority safety improvement needs through a balloting process in its annual technical advisory committee meeting.
Start Date: January 1, 2005
End Date: December 31, 2017
Goals:The key project objectives are to develop reliable estimates of the effectiveness of the safety improvements that are identified as strategies in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 500 Guides. These evaluations provide crash modification factors (CMFs) and benefit/cost (B/C) ratio for nationwide field applications of proven low-cost safety countermeasures.
Background Information: The goal of this research is to develop reliable estimates of the effectiveness of the safety improvements that are identified as strategies in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 500 Guides. In 1998, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) approved its Strategic Highway Safety Plan, which was developed by the AASHTO Standing Committee for Highway Traffic Safety with the assistance of the Federal Highway Administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the Transportation Research Board Committee on Transportation Safety Management. The plan includes strategies in 22 key emphasis areas that affect highway safety. Each of the emphasis areas includes strategies and an outline of what is needed to implement each strategy. There are 22 available volumes of NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, a series in which relevant information is assembled into single concise volumes, each pertaining to specific types of highway crashes (e.g., run-off-road, head-on) or contributing factors (e.g., aggressive driving). All volumes of the report are published and linked to the AASHTO Safety Plan Web site.
Test Methodology: Empirical Bays statistical analysis for before-after studies.
Other Information: The Federal Highway Administration’s Human Factors Laboratory was used for phase IV. The phase was completed and published. In addition to the URLs below regarding this project, you may also find additional information about this project at the following pooled fund Web site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/research/tfhrc/projects/safety/comprehensive/elcsi/index.cfm
Partners:
  • Federal Highway Administration: Office of Research, Development, and Technology - Office of Safety Research and Development; Role(s): Technical, Advisory
  • Florida Department of Transportation; Role(s): Other stakeholder, Advisory
  • Wisconsin Department of Transportation; Role(s): Other stakeholder, Advisory
  • California Department of Transportation; Role(s): Other stakeholder, Advisory
  • Iowa Department of Transportation; Role(s): Other stakeholder, Advisory
  • Missouri Department of Transportation; Role(s): Other stakeholder, Advisory
  • Connecticut Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Georgia Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Illinois Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Indiana Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Kansas Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Kentucky Transportation Cabinet; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Maryland State Highway Administration; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Massachusetts Highway Department; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Minnesota Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Mississippi Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Montana Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • New York State Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • North Carolina Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • North Dakota Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • South Carolina Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • South Dakota Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Tennessee Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Texas Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Utah Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Virginia Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
  • Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.; Role(s): Technical, Other stakeholder
  • Ohio Department of Transportation; Role(s): Advisory, Other stakeholder
Expected Benefits:The expected benefits are producing crash modification factors (CMFs) and benefit/cost (B/C) ratio analysis for nationwide application of low-cost safety countermeasures, enabling State and local highway agencies to make more cost-effective investment decisions. Also, it benefits the participating States by providing them a vehicle for conducting peer exchange and technology transfer where it concerns highway safety improvement installations. At the same time, 38 State members provide feedback to the Federal Highway Administration for their high- priority safety research needs through balloting process.
Deliverables:1. Name: Full technical reports and technical briefs.
Product Type(s): Research report, Techbrief, Technical report
Description: Full technical reports.
Publication URL(s):
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/09045/index.cfm
2. Name: TechBriefs
Product Type(s): Techbrief, Technical report
Description: Full Reports and TechBriefs.
Publication URL(s):
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/09046/index.cfm
3. Name: Technical reports and TechBriefs.
Product Type(s): Research report, Techbrief
Description: Technical reports and TechBriefs.
Keywords: Research
Safety
Empirical Methods
Collisions
Countermeasures
Highway Safety
Subject Areas: Safety and Human Factors
Research
Highways