Evaluations of Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study
PPT version for Printing
Flashing Beacons at Stop Controlled Intersections Results
Dr. Raghavan Srinivasan, HSRC
Background on Strategy
- Alert drivers to the presence of an intersection
- Reduce angle crashes
- Initial installation costs: $2,000 to $ 100,000
- Placement Options
- STOP Sign mounted
- Overhead
|

 |
Literature Review
- Previous Work
- Cribbons and Walton 1970
- 14 rural sites
- About 1 year before, 1 year after
- Pant et al. 1999
- 6 sites without and 7 with a beacon
- Murphy and Hummer 2007
- 34 locations in North Carolina
- Empirical Bayes study – accounted for change in traffic volume using a linear assumption
- Safety effectiveness has not been adequately quantified
Objective
- To examine the safety impact
- Target crash types considered included:
- Total intersection crashes.
- Total intersection injury and fatal crashes (including fatality (K), Injury, incapacitating (A), Injury, non–capacitating (B), and possible injury (C).
- Total intersection angle crashes.
- Total intersection rear–end crashes.
- Determine if safety impacts are function of:
- Area type (rural, suburban, or urban).
- Intersection type (Two–way versus four– way stop–controlled).
- Types of flashing beacon installations including standard and actuated.
- Location of the beacon including stop sign or overhead.
Study Design
- Based on methodology suggested by Hauer (1997)
- Literature review to determine the average number of crashes at stop controlled intersections
- Sample size
- Minimum: 53 intersection–years in the before period (ability to detect 20 percent reduction in crashes at 90 percent confidence level)
- Desirable: 260 intersection–years in the before period (ability to detect 10 percent reduction in crashes at 90 percent confidence level)
Data Collection
Data Collection – North Carolina
Total number of intersections used = 64
| Variable |
Before |
After |
| Site–Years |
583 |
305 |
| Major Road AADT |
3578 |
5105 |
| Minor Road AADT |
1540 |
2074 |
| Total Crashes per site–year |
2.85 |
2.99 |
| Angle Crashes per site–year |
1.66 |
1.45 |
| Injury and Fatal Crashes per site–year |
1.68 |
1.58 |
| Rear–end crashes per site–year |
0.31 |
0.42 |
Data Collection – South Carolina
Total number of intersections used = 42
| Variable |
Before |
After |
| Site–Years |
334 |
128 |
| Major Road AADT |
3978 |
4531 |
| Minor Road AADT |
1938 |
2192 |
| Total Crashes per site–year |
2.73 |
2.64 |
| Angle Crashes per site–year |
1.17 |
1.27 |
| Injury and Fatal Crashes per site–year |
0.94 |
0.89 |
| Rear–end crashes per site–year |
0.55 |
0.61 |
Aggregate Evaluation Results: North Carolina
| |
Angle |
Injury and Fatal |
Rear–end |
Total |
| Expected crashes without strategy |
532.6 |
533.7 |
148.0 |
973.2 |
| Observed crashes |
436 |
469 |
127 |
894 |
| Estimate of percent reduction |
18.3 |
12.2 |
14.6 |
8.2 |
| (standard error) |
(4.9) |
(5.1) |
(9.7) |
(4.0) |
Aggregate Evaluation Results: South Carolina
| |
Angle |
Injury and Fatal |
Rear–end |
Total |
| Expected crashes without strategy |
156.6 |
115.1 |
73.6 |
323.8 |
| Observed crashes |
162 |
114 |
78 |
338 |
| Estimate of percent reduction |
–2.7 |
1.8 |
–3.9 |
–4.0 |
| (standard error) |
(11.7) |
(12.9) |
(18.5) |
(8.2) |
Aggregate Evaluation Results: NC and SC Combined
| |
Angle |
Injury and Fatal |
Rear–end |
Total |
| Expected crashes without strategy |
689.2 |
648.8 |
221.6 |
1297.0 |
| Observed crashes |
598 |
583 |
205 |
1232 |
| Estimate of percent reduction |
13.3 |
10.2 |
7.9 |
5.1 |
| (standard error) |
(4.6) |
(4.8) |
(8.9) |
(3.6) |
Disaggregate Evaluation Results: Angle Crashes
| Disaggregate Group |
Sites |
Estimate of percent reduction (Standard Error) |
| Rural (NC and SC) |
76 |
15.7 (5.3) |
| Suburban (NC) |
14 |
11.8 (10.2) |
| Urban (NC and SC) |
16 |
–12.3 (23.4) |
| 2–way stop (NC and SC) |
95 |
12.7 (4.7) |
| 2–way stop (SC) |
31 |
–10.4 (13.4) |
| 4–way stop (SC) |
11 |
27.8 (20.5) |
| Beacon Type–Standard (NC and SC) |
89 |
13.3 (5.2) |
| Beacon Type–Standard (NC) |
47 |
19.8 (5.7) |
| Beacon Type–Other (NC) |
17 |
14.0 (9.8) |
| Beacon Location–Overhead (NC and SC) |
97 |
14.7 (4.8) |
| Beacon Location–Other (NC and SC) |
9 |
–5.8 (18.4) |
| Beacon Location–Overhead (NC and SC) |
97 |
14.7 (4.8) |
Economic Analysis
- FHWA cost per crash for unsignalized intersections (FHWA–HRT–05–051)
- $13,238 for rear–end
- $61,114 for right–angle
- Economic Benefit
- Based on combined results from NC and SC
- $ 12,040 per site–year
- Costs estimated for Standard and ‘Other’ types separately
- Standard Beacons:
- $ 27,500 initial installation costs (high value)
- Annual Maintenance and other costs: $ 720
- 10 year life
- Annualized costs = $ 4,636
- Benefit Cost ratio is 2.6:1
- ‘Other’ Beacons:
- Initial costs range from $ 5,000 to $ 100,000
- Benefit achieved if initial cost is less than $ 79,000
- 2:1 Benefit/Cost ratio if initial cost is less than $ 37,000
Conclusions
- NC: statistically significant reduction in total, angle, and injury and fatal crashes
- SC: very little change
- NC and SC combined: statistically significant reduction in angle and injury and fatal crashes
- Probably more effective in rural and suburban locations
- Very few locations with stop sign mounted beacons
- Standard beacons provide a benefit cost ratio of 2.6:1
- Net benefit of non–standard beacons depends on their cost
< Presentation 4 | Presentation 6 >