United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home Feedback
   Skip to the content of the page.
   CALENDAR OF EVENTS divider TRAINING divider TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT divider TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE divider
   Home   divider  What's New   divider  Top FHWA News   divider  Success Stories   divider end of menu

Photo: Individuals gathered around desk

Planning Home
space image
Planning Solutions/Best Practices
space image
Planning Training
space image
Planning Newsletters & Publications
space image
Planning Calendar
space image
Planning Links
space image
Planning Fundamentals
Metropolitan Planning
space image
Statewide Planning
space image
Tribal Planning
space image
Planning Specialty Areas
Congestion Management Systems
space image
Environmental Justice
space image
Freight Planning
space image
GIS and Transportation Planning
space image
Land Use and Transportation Planning
space image
Listserv & Videoconferences
space image
Planning Capacity Building
space image
Planning Data
space image
Safety Conscious Planning
space image
Travel Demand Forecasting
space image
 

FHWA Resource Center

PLANNING TEAM

Image of traffic congestion entitled Congestion Management Systems

Why are Congestion Management Systems needed?

Congestion has been defined as: "The level at which transportation system performance is no longer acceptable due to traffic interference. The level of acceptable system performance may vary by type of transportation facility, geographic location and/or time of day. Growth in traffic has out paced the ability of State and local governments to be able to implement capacity solutions to eliminate congestion. In order to "manage" the level of congestion within metropolitan areas, congestion management systems (CMS) were created as a way to address this traffic and person travel growth. A CMS is "A systematic process for managing congestion that provides information on system performance and on alternative strategies for alleviating congestion and enhancing the mobility of persons and goods.  A CMS includes methods to monitor and evaluate performance, identify alternative actions, assess and implement cost-effective actions and evaluate the effectiveness of implemented actions.

CMP Relationship to the RTP upward trend from 2000 through 2020 -- with the travel demand intersecting the RTP improvements around the year 2020

 

Travel Demand in 2020

  • 34% increase in vehicle trips
  • 47% increase in vehicle miles traveling

Regional Transportation Plan

  • Long range
  • Congestion reduction
  • Balance capacity, demand and management solutions

Congestion Management Program

  • Short range
  • Congestion management
  • Focus on demand and travel management solutions

SANDAG CMS Fact Sheet
CMP or CMS managing the gap between growth in travel demand and planned capacity

Even though the rest of the management systems were made optional by Congress with the NHS Designation Act, a CMS is still required by 23 USC 134 (i)(3) for those MPOs that have over 200,000 people and are classified as Transportation Management Areas.

Hot items
See the Training section about the new Resource Center refresher class on CMS.

Performance Measures

NCHRP and TTI produced 2 reports on congestion performance measures from NCHRP 398,a Final Report (Report NR398A), and a User's Guide (Report 398B), in 1997 link to TRB

TTI has produced a new report on measuring system reliability Selecting Travel Reliability Measures.

Strategies
The MPO for Kansas City, MARC, has a good "tool box" of CMS strategies.

Evaluation Methods
An example of the evaluation of effectiveness of CMS strategies can be found in the CMS handbook developed for the St. Louis MPO, chapter 6 & 7.

Training
The Resource Center has a 1 1/2 day workshop on Implementing Effective Congestion Management Systems. It is intended to be a refresher on how Congestion Management Systems are developed with some of the state of the art examples of CMS from around the country.

Brochure
Agenda

FY 2004 Schedule We have had requests to do workshops in Florida, Indiana, Texas, Michigan, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina, Minnesota and 2 more in California. Once the reauthorization and travel picture for the next fiscal year becomes clearer, we will be scheduling workshops. If you would like to get on the schedule contact Ben Williams. Spaces are available in the other sessions if you just want to attend one. We can direct you to the local contact person for that session.

Handout materials for the workshop are located on the old SRC FTP server. For more information contact Ben Williams at 404-562-3671.

Questions for Division Certification Reviews

Section 13 of the new TMA Certification Handbook gives good examples of discussion items when looking at a CMS. Since the Handbook has yet to be public ally released yet we are duplicating the sample questions to think about when doing reviews of a CMS.

Sample Discussion Questions:

  • How do I know a Transportation Management Area (TMA) has defined an area and network where they will be monitoring congestion and implementing the steps that are mentioned in the 23CFR §500.109(b).
  • What kind of CMS complies with the Regulation?
  • What kind of interaction with local transit, freight and traffic control operators, etc. have been established?
  • Do these partners share data, performance measures, etc. and do they contribute strategies toward solving regional congestion problems?
  • What is the output/outcomes of the CMS?
  • Has the CMS been fully integrated into the overall metropolitan planning process?
  • If the CMS is integrated into the regular planning process, can we see its process, evaluations and strategies in all of the planning products, e.g., UPWP, long range plan, corridor studies and TIP?
  • How does the CMS affect the programming of projects? Does it account for points in project prioritization criteria?
  • How often is the CMS updated?
  • What CMS work activities are included in the UPWP? How much data are enough and what types of data are being collected?
  • What are the performance measures and how many are appropriate?
  • Does the MPO use measurements of congestion in the real world or are they modeled?
  • If in a non-attainment area, is there documentation of the SOV analysis?
  • Are TDM and operational commitments recommended by the CMS eventually implemented?
  • What strategies are being implemented and how are they different from those resulting from the regular planning process?
  • Who are the appropriate implementers of CMS strategies? (e.g., the State DOT, Transportation Management Associations, Transit Agencies, locals, etc.)
  • Does the CMS claim credit for the strategies implemented by others?
  • Is the reevaluation just updating the system performance measures or does it evaluate corridors and/or projects and strategies?
  • How often are CMS strategies or projects reevaluated?
  • What level of detail is used? Is it a corridor-based approach? Does the MPO have to look at every driveway or is the 50, 000 ft view acceptable?
  • How much monitoring is enough and how often is it done?

Links

Texas Transportation Institute Urban Mobility Study

Access Management has been one of the most effective strategies at reducing congestion. TRB has developed a Access Management Manual.

FHWA Congestion WebSite

FHWA System Management and Operations: A Planner's Resource

FHWA Travel Time Collection Handbook

CMS Case Studies

Hampton Roads Planning District Commission

North Jersey MPO

South Western Regional Planning Agency

North Central Texas COG

FHWA Resource Center logo
yellow circle
CONTACT US
staff / phones

Technical Service Teams
Air Quality

Civil Rights

Communications and Marketing

Construction & Project Mgmt

Environment

Finance Services

Geotech & Hydraulics

Innovative Finance

Operations

Pavement & Materials

Planning

Safety & Design

Structures

Corporate Management
Administrative

Information & Management

FHWA Logo

FHWA Home | Feedback
United States Department of Transportation · Federal Highway Administration