Reference

Summary

Boarnet, Marlon G. and Sharon Sarmiento (1998). Can Land-use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link between Non-work Travel and Land-use Characteristics. Urban Studies, Vol. 35 No. 7.

Tests the hypothesis that land use patterns affect non-work trip generation rates using a regression analysis, using travel diary data for southern California.

Cambridge Systematics, with Hague Consulting Group; Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Calthorpe Associates (1991, 1993). Making the Land Use Transportation Air Quality Connection: Modeling Practices (Vol. 1); Model Modifications: The Pedestrian Environment (Vol. 4A). 1,000 Friends of Oregon. Internet: http://www.teleport.com/~friends/index.html

Describes modeling of alternative development and land use patterns using regional travel demand models.

Cervero, Robert (1989). Jobs-Housing Balancing and Regional Mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 55 (Spring 1989): 136-150.

Examines impacts of spatial mismatch of jobs and affordable housing in the suburbs on sprawl, con-gestion, air pollution, and energy depletion.

Cervero, Robert and Carolyn Radisch (1996). Travel Choice in Pedestrian Versus Automobile-Oriented Neighborhoods. Transport Policy Vol. 3, No. 3.

Compares modal splits between two neighbor-hoods in the San Francisco Bay area, to examine the influence of the built environment on both work and non-work travel.

Cervero, Robert and Kara Kockelman (1997). Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research D, Vol. 2, No. 3.

Examines the impact of land use variables, including density, diversity, and pedestrian-oriented design, on trip rates and non-auto travel.

Cervero, Robert and Roger Gorham (1995). Commuting in Transit Versus Automobile Neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 61 No. 2.

Discusses a matched-pair study comparing mode shares and total trips in auto vs. transit-oriented neighborhoods.

Crane, R. and R. Crepeau (1998). Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel? A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data. Transportation Research D, Vol. 3, No. 4.

Using data from San Diego, compares the impacts of land use and street network design characteris-tics on travel behavior.

Dunphy, Robert and Kimberly Fisher (1996). Transportation, Congestion, and Density: New Insights. Transportation Research Record 1552.

Compares VMT vs. local population density using NPTS and census data.

Ewing, Reid (1995). Beyond Density, Mode Choice, and Single-Purpose Trips. Transportation Quarterly, Fall 1995.

Investigates the independent effects of land use variables, including regional accessibility, local density, and mix of uses, on household travel behavior.

Ewing, Reid, MaryBeth DeAnna, and Shi-Chiang Li (1996). Land Use Impacts on Trip Generation Rates. Transportation Research Record, No. 1518, July 1996.

Using data from Florida's travel surveys, examines the impact of residential density, mixed use, and accessibility on household trip rates.

Frank, Lawrence and Gary Pivo (1994). Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking. Transportation Research Record 1466.

Using Seattle travel survey and land use data, evaluates the effects of land use density and mix on travel.

Friedman, Bruce; Stephen Gordon and John Peers (1994). Effect of Neotraditional Design on Travel Characteristics. Transportation Research Record 1466.

Evaluates travel differences between neotraditional and PUD communities.

Handy, Susan (1996). Urban Form and Pedestrian Choices: Study of Austin Neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record 1552.

Surveys residents in Austin neighborhoods to determine impacts of urban form on walking.

Kitamura, Ryuichi; Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Laura Laidet (1997). A Micro-Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Vol. 24 No. 2, May 1997.

Uses stated-preference surveys to determine the relative influence of socioeconomic, attitudinal, and neighborhood characteristics on travel behav-ior, including mode choice and total number of trips by mode.

McNally, Michael and Anup Kulkarni (1997). An Assessment of the Land Use-Transportation System and Travel Behavior. Transportation Research Record 1607.

Compares the number of trips in traditional neigh-borhoods, planned-unit developments, and hybrid neighborhoods in Southern California.

Thompson, Gregory L. and Ivonne Audirac. TODs Can Increase Transit Ridership Significantly: Planning Scenarios from Sacramento. Presented at the 1999 Transportation Research Board Meeting, Paper #990667.

Uses regional travel demand model to assess the effects of alternative growth scenarios (sprawl, TOD, TOD/downtown) on transit ridership and auto use.