Second, a set of 14 criteria, 9 substantive and 5 methodological, were defined. Rating criteria included five recommended by ITS America (congestion, safety, mobility, environment and economic) relevance to existing data, guidelines, older drivers and younger drivers. In addition, three potential methodologies (laboratory, field, and survey) were rated on dimensions of cost, time, practicality, generality, and overall suitability. Eight experienced human factors experts completed all 2,184 cells in a rating matrix for a total of 17,472 rating entries in the data set.
Third, a linear psychometric model was used to prioritize the 91 issues. The model was validated by sending the raters three short prioritized lists: List A contained the highest rated 16 issues for the entire data set; List B contained the highest rated 16 issues based only on the data for the individual rater, and List C contained a stratified random sample of 16 candidate issues. issues. Raters were asked to delete unimportant and impractical research issues from these lists. They deleted significantly more items from the random list, demonstrating that the prioritized list was valid.
The final prioritized list contained the 9 most vital studies/issues followed by the 12 most important remaining studies/issues. The nine vital issues are:
The 12 most important remaining studies/issues:
This report documents the evaluation of human factors issues uncovered in the analytic segment of this effort. Filtering all the results to obtain a prioritized list of key research topics was not a simple task. Producing the final list required a psychometric analysis of 17,472 data points generated by 8 human factors experts. Analyzing a set of issues that has already been selected from a very large set of reports is technically difficult, because the selected issues form a narrow range of items: inappropriate items have already been weeded out by the selection process itself. Nevertheless, the validation study showed that this psychometric analysis was successful. Thus, we can have great confidence that the final prioritized list is well-suited to guide future research. The key issues listed here must be addressed if human factors as a discipline is to make a substantial technical contribution to the development of ATIS and CVO components of ITS.