United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA HomeFeedback

 

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

BY: Louis N. Triandafilou, P.E. FHWA Resource Center - Baltimore Senior Structural Engineer

CLAUDE S. NAPIER, Jr., P.E.
FHWA Virginia Division Bridge Engineer

Rodolfo F. Maruri, P.E.
FHWA Virginia Assistant Division Bridge Engineer1


High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

Outline

  • HPC Introduction
  • 2006 National HPC Survey
    • Alternative Reinforcement
    • Self-Consolidating Concrete
    • Lightweight HPC
  • Conclusion

 

Introduction: Cost of Corrosioon - "Deficient Bridges"

Introduction - Cost of Substructure Corrosion

Introduction - Accident Damage

Introduction - Act of Good Damage

HPC Team Meeting - May 2004 Nationwide HPC Survey (2003) Results - Bar Chart

Map of the US - dark green color states  means they have used HPC in specification on the last 10 years. Light green color states means that they have not used HPC in specification

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

PURPOSE

  • Quantify the number and application of high performance concrete (HPC) projects across the nation,
  • Obtain information on the use of high performance reinforcement.
  • Follow-up to earlier HPC Survey 2003

 

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

QUESTIONNAIRE

  • Prepared by a task force of the FHWA High Performance Concrete Technology Delivery Team
  • Members of task force include
    • State DOT
    • Industry
    • FHWA

 

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

SURVEY DISTRIBUTION

  • Survey sent to:
    • 50 States
    • Federal Lands Highway
    • Puerto Rico
    • District of Colombia (DC)

 

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

SURVEY TOPICS

  • General Use of HPC
  • HPC for Permeability Benefit
  • HPC for Strength Benefit
  • Self-Consolidating Concrete
  • Lightweight HPC
  • Alternative Reinforcement

 

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

SURVEY TOPICS (cont.)

  • Alternative Reinforcement
    • Stainless Steel Reinforcement
    • Stainless Steel Clad Reinforcement
    • Epoxy Coated Reinforcement
    • Galvanized Reinforcement
    • MMFX Microcomposite (MMFX-2) Reinforcement
    • FRP Reinforcement
      • GFRP
      • CFRP
      • AFRP

 

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

SURVEY TOPICS (cont.)

  • General Section
    • Primary characteristics of HPC tested
    • Method for specifying HPC
    • Number of projects planned and constructed
    • HPC Specification
    • Percentage of HPC used in the last 3 years (check)

 

Table of State/Province on General Use of HPC

Bar Chart - General Use oF HPC

US Map - The Use of HPC for Deck Overlays

US Map - The Use of HPC for BRIDGE Decks

US Map - The Use of HPC for BRIDGE Superstructures

Bar Chart - HPC For Permeability Benefit

US Map - Permeability Range for Bridge Overlays

US Map - the Permeability Range for Bridge Decks

Bar Chart - HPC for Strength Benefit - Deck and Substructure

Bar Chart - HPC for Strength Benefit - Superstructure

US Map - Follow up High Performance Concrete Questionnaire HPC for Strength - Superstructure

Bar Chart - Self-Consolidating Concrete Superstructures and Other Precast Elements

Bar Chart - Self-Consolidated Concrete Substructure Elements

Bar Chart - Lightweight High Performance Concrete

Bar Chart - Stainless Steel Reinforcement Usage

Bar Chart - Lightweight High Performance Concrete

US Map - Use of Stainless Steel Reinforcement in Superstructures

Bar Chart - Stainless Steel Cladded Reinforcement Usage

US Map - Use of Stainless Stell Cladded Reinforcement in Decks

US Map - Stainless Steel Cladded Reinforcement in Superstructures

Bar Chart - Galvanized Refinforcement Usage

Bar Chart - MMFX2 Composite Reinforcement Usage

Galvanized Reinforcement Usage

Bar Chart on MMFX2 Microcomposite Reinforcement Usage

 

Bar Chart for Primary Characteristics of HPC Tested

Bar chart - Constructed Projects Using End-Result-Specifications

Bar Chart - Percentage of projects bid during 2004-2006 that included a HPC bridge element

US Map - Projects Bid During 2004-2006 that included a HPC Bridge Element

Bar Chart - Percentage of projects during 2004-2006 that included a HPC bridge element

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

Conclusions

  • HPC Provides
    • Extension of service life
    • Reduced Maintenance
    • Lower Life Cycle Cost
  • Significant progress in HPC Implementation in the past 15 years, however, more needs to be done
  • State DOT and Industry have taken advantage of strength and durability oh HPC

 

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

Conclusions (cont.)

  • Researchers and academics have provided solutions to design and construction problems
  • FHWA has supported the research, development, deployment and implementation of HPC through the many programs and intiatives described above
  • FHWA will continue to ensure that public and private sector partnerships be strenghthened for succesful implementation of HPC

A photo of a man working on the hood of his car.

A photo a bridge

High Performance 2006-07 Follow-Up Survey Results

QUESTIONS?

THANK YOU

Next >>



FHWA Home | Feedback
FHWA