The page you requested has moved and you've automatically been taken to its new location.
Please update your link or bookmark after closing this notice.
Status of Sanction Clocks under the Clean Air Act Updated 9/10/15
Section 179 of the Clean Air Act (42 USC 7509) requires automatic sanctions when:
Sanctions must be applied unless the deficiency is corrected within 18 months after the finding or disapproval. Highway sanctions are used for purposes of enforcing deadlines for SIP submittals and the implementation of approved SIP measures or elements required under the CAA. Sanctions are intended to induce States to develop strategies to attain the air quality standards. There are two sanctions required by Section 179 (42 USC 7509) .
18 months after the finding or disapproval, the offset sanction is imposed. The offset sanction is related to the fact that owners of new or expanded stationary sources of a pollutant for which an area is in nonattainment must "offset" their increased emissions by reducing existing emissions by at least the amount of the increase. This requirement is related to air quality since it prevents economic development from increasing emissions in areas that are already violating the air quality standards. In areas that are not sanctioned, offsets are required on a sliding scale from 1.1 to 1 in cleaner nonattainment areas to 1.5 to 1 in the dirtier nonattainment areas. However, offset sanction requires new or expanded stationary sources to reduce emissions by 2 tons for every 1 ton of emission growth. Because offsets are expensive and difficult to obtain, this is a very serious penalty.
If the deficiency is not corrected within 6 months of the imposition of the offset sanction, highway sanctions are imposed. The highway sanction is a prohibition on Federal funds for transportation projects within an area, except for certain safety, transit, and air quality beneficial projects. This sanction could be air quality related in an area that is nonattainment for transportation related pollutants, but is intended primarily as an economic incentive to SIP submission. Therefore, highway sanctions could be imposed even when the SIP deficiency is not transportation related. Sanctions apply for all types of nonattainment areas, including those without transportation-related pollutant problems.
These automatic sanctions imposed under Section 179 (42 USC 7509) apply only in nonattainment areas. They do not apply in attainment or maintenance areas. EPA does have the option, under Section 110(m) (42 USC 7410(m)) of the Clean Air Act, to apply discretionary sanctions more widely.
Section 110(m) (42 USC 7410(m)) of the Clean Air Act allows EPA to apply sanctions at any time, or any time after, making a finding, disapproval, or determination that some CAA provision has not been met, and also allows those sanctions to be applied to any portion of a State that EPA finds reasonable to ensure that CAA requirements are met. The only restriction is that EPA may not apply sanctions statewide for two years when a political subdivision is responsible for the failure to comply with the law. After two years, EPA can sanction an entire State for the failing of a single city, and it can sanction at any time a whole state for the failure of a state agency or entity, such as the State legislature.
The imposition of statewide sanctions is subject to notice and comment in the Federal Register.
On March 11, 1996 the FHWA released a guidance document entitled "FHWA Sanction Exemption Criteria" and this memo defines the exemption criteria that will be used to determine which projects can go forward and which grants may be awarded in the event EPA imposes highway sanctions under Section 179(b) (42 USC 7509) or Section 110(m) (42 USC 7410(m)) of the Clean Air Act. The policy information identifies which categories of highway projects are exempt from highway sanctions, such as safety, environmentally-beneficial, and planning and research activities funded under Title 23 of United States Code (Federal-aid Highway Program). The EPA and DOT have agreed that additional programs such as TCMs in EPA-approved SIPs, inspection and maintenance facilities, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, carpool/vanpool programs, and conversion of existing lanes for HOV use during peak periods are also categorically exempt during EPA highway sanctions. Additional information may be obtained via the guidance memorandum which was published in the Federal Register on April 1, 1996 (61 FR14363).
Highway sanctions, when applied, halt the approval of projects and the award of any grants funded under Title 23, United States Code, except as for those types of projects, such as safety projects, that are defined in the Clean Air Act. This applies to the following major funding programs:
Projects funded under all other Title 23 programs and other authorizations are also subject to sanctions, including High Priority Projects identified by Congress. Projects funded under Title 49, U.S.C. chapter 53, the Federal Transit Act, as amended, are categorically exempt from sanctions by law as are other transportation programs authorized by statutes other than Title 23.
The following types of projects generally do not meet the exemption criteria of the Clean Air Act and would be subject to highway sanctions. These include projects that expand highway capacity, nonexempt project development activities, and any other project that does not explicitly meet exemption criteria. These may include activities for:
Under section 179(b)(1) of the CAA (42 USC 7509) , once EPA imposes highway sanctions, the Federal Highway Administration may not approve or award any grants in the sanctioned area except those that are specifically exempted. These exempted projects fall under three categories:
Safety projects are those for which the principal purpose is an improvement in safety but the projects may also have other important benefits. These projects must resolve a demonstrated safety problem with the likely result being a significant reduction in or avoidance of accidents as determined by the FHWA. Such demonstration must be supported by accident or other data submitted by the State or appropriate local government. Examples of projects generally exempt from highway sanctions include Emergency Relief (ER) projects, statewide safety improvement programs, and programs administered by NHTSA.
Justification for an exemption on the grounds of safety must be based on accident or other data. Projects exempted under the safety provision may not involve substantial functional (such as upgrading major arterial to freeways), locational, or capacity changes except when the safety problem could not otherwise be solved.
Seven project types are identified specifically in the CAA section as exempt from highway sanctions. They include:
Transportation programs not otherwise exempt that improve air quality and which would not encourage SOV capacity (as determined by EPA in consultation with DOT) are also exempt from highway sanctions.
The EPA and DOT have agreed that the following projects will be categorically exempt from highway sanctions, and will not require additional EPA review or an individual finding by EPA:
The following projects are likely to have virtually no environmental impacts, provide other aesthetic benefits, do not promote SOV capacity, and are, therefore considered exempt from highway sanctions:
Planning and research activities for transportation and/or air quality purposes are exempt from highway sanctions. Such planning and research is critical for the development of projects that improve safety and address an area's transportation/air quality needs.
Development and completion of studies to meet requirements under NEPA are exempt from highway sanctions as long as consideration of projects that would be exempt under this policy memorandum, such as transit or other Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures, are actively pursued as reasonable independent alternatives. Once all alternatives that could be considered exempt from highway sanctions under this policy memorandum are eliminated, project development activities for NEPA or other purposes are no longer exempt and can no longer be approved or funded under Title 23. For example, if prior to completion of NEPA documentation, all TDM measures are eliminated from consideration and the sole remaining question is the determination of an alignment for a highway capacity-expanding project (which may include TDM), subsequent project development activities are not exempt from highway sanctions.
The FHWA may not approve preliminary engineering for final design of a project, nor can approval be granted for a project's plans, specifications, and estimates after initiation of highway sanctions for projects that are not exempt from sanctions. Neither right-of-way nor any necessary equipment may be purchased or leased with Federal funds for nonexempt projects while an area is under sanction. Federally-funded construction may not in any way begin on a project that is not exempt while an area is under sanction.
There are two separate legislative requirements for conformity and sanctions under the CAA. The above sections discuss the sanctions provisions.
The conformity provisions of the of the CAA require that the MPO and the U.S. DOT determine the conformity of transportation plans and transportation improvement programs (TIPs) with State air quality plans. A conformity lapse results from the failure to establish conformity within required time frames or the failure to meet emissions budgets or to pass one of the conformity tests. Unlike sanctions, a conformity lapse occurs immediately, if the requirements are not met. When a conformity lapse occurs, only limited types of projects can proceed. And, unlike highways sanctions, conformity lapses affect transit capactiy projects and regionally significant non-Federal projects.
For more information regarding transportation conformity, please visit our conformity website.
Clean Air Act Section 179 (42 USC 7509) - Sanctions and Consequences of Failure to Attain
EPA Regulations on Sanctions (40 CFR Chapter 1 '52.30 - 52.32)