1. PURPOSE. To provide supplementary tables related to the apportionment of the authorizations of the following funds for FY 1992:

   Interstate Maintenance
   National Highway System
   Bridge Replacement & Rehabilitation
   Surface Transportation Program
   Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality
   Metropolitan Planning
   Apportionment Adjustment
   Interstate Transfer
   Minimum Allocation
   Donor State Bonus

2. SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES

   1. Table 1 shows the total amount of Interstate funds authorized for FY 1993 and non-Interstate funds authorized for FY 1992 apportioned to States by formula.

   2. Table 2 shows the total amount of FY 1993 Interstate Construction and FY 1992 Interstate Maintenance,National Highway System, Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation, Surface Transportation Program, Apportionment Adjustment, Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality and Interstate Transfer funds exclusive of amounts reserved for 2 percent Highway Planning and Research (HPR) projects.

   3. Table 3 shows the total amount of 2 percent Highway Planning and Research (HPR) funds available (per section 6001 of Public Law 102-240) from Interstate Construction apportioned for FY 1993 and Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System, Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation, Surface Transportation Program, Interstate Transfer, and Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality fund apportioned for FY 1992. The table also shows, the Mandatory 25 percent requirement for Research, Development and Technology Transfer and the amount of 2 percent HPR funds available to each State for projects under the National Cooperative Highway Research Program.

   4. Table 4 shows the limiting amounts available for 1 1/2 percent Highway Planning and Research (HPR) projects from Minimum Allocation funds apportioned for FY 1992. Also shown is the 1/2 percent available for Metropolitan Planning from Minimum Allocation funds apportioned for FY 1992.

   5. Table 5 shows the limiting amounts available for 1/16th of 1 percent National Highway Institute Education and Training (E&T) projects from Surface Transportation funds apportioned for FY 1992. The table also shows the limiting amounts available for 1/4 percent Skill Training projects (authorized in section 1026 of Public Law 102-240) from Surface Transportation and Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation funds apportioned for FY 1992.

   6. Table 6 shows the 10 percent limiting amount available for traffic control signalization; pavement markings; commuter carpooling and vanpooling; installation of traffic signs; traffic lights; guardrails; impact attenuator, concrete barriers endtreatments, breakaway utility poles or priority control systems for emergency vehicles at signalized intersection pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 120(c), from Interstate Construction apportioned for FY 1993 and Interstate Maintenance, Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation, National Highway System, Surface Transportation, Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality funds apportioned for FY 1992.

   7. Table 7 shows the distribution of Surface Transportation funds displaying the sub-allocations for the following:

      (1) The installation of protective devices at railway-highway crossings pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 130(a).

      (2) The elimination of hazards of railway-highway crossings pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 130(e).

      (3) The elimination of hazards on any public road pursuant to 23 U.S.C 152.

      (4) Amounts available for any of the safety categories.

      (5) The total amount of Surface Transportation funds that are to be obligated for safety projects pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 133(d)(1).

      (6) The total amount required to be obligated for transportation enhancement activities per section 1007(c) of Public Law 102-240.

      (7) The amount of funds that are to be obligated in urbanized areas over 200,000 populations pursuant to 23 U.S.C 123(d)(3).

      (8) The amount of funds that are to be obligated in areas of less than 200,000 population pursuant to 23 U.S.C 133(d)(3).

      (9) The amount of funds that are to be obligated in areas of the State (other than urban areas with a population greater than 5,000) pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 133(d)(3)(B).

      (10) The amount of funds which may be obligated in any area of the State for Surface Transportation Program projects. These amounts include the 1/2 of the Apportionment Adjustment fund that are not subject to the Safety, Transportation Enhancement, or population distribution.

   8. Table 8 shows the funds withheld and the sub-allocations of the remaining 1992 Minimum Allocation apportionment as follows:

      (1) The amount of funds that are to be obligated in urbanized areas over 200,000 population pursuant to 23 U.S.C 133(d)(3).

      (2) The amount of funds that are to be obligated in areas of less than 200,000 population pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 133(d)(3).

      (3) The amounts that are to be obligated in areasless than 5,000.

      (4) The amounts of funds which may be obligated in any area of the State. These amount include the 1/2 of the Minimum Allocation funds that are not subject to the population distribution.

   9. Table 9 shows the distribution of Donor State Bonus funds displaying the sub-allocations for the following:

      (1) The amount of funds that are to be obligated in FHWA NOTICE N 4510.275 March 30, 1992 urbanized areas over 200,000 population pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 133(d)(3).

      (2) The amount of funds that are to be obligated in areas of less than 200,000 population pursuant to 23 U.S.C 133(d)(3).

      (3) The amount of funds that are to obligated in areas less than 5,000 unless a State meets the requirement using Surface Transportation Program and Minimum Allocation funds.

      (5) The amount of funds which may be obligated in any area of the State. These amounts include the 1/2 of the Donor State Bonus funds are not subject to section 133(d)(3).

   10. Table 10 shows the sub-allocations to urbanized areas of 200,000 or more population of Surface Transportation, Minimum Allocation, and Donor State Bonus funds from the FY 1992 apportionment.

   11. Table 11 shows the amounts of FY 1992 Interstate Transfer funds apportioned to Interstate withdrawal areas pursuant to 23 U.S.C 103(e)(4).

   12. Table 12 shows the total amounts of the FY 1992 apportionments of the bridge replacement and rehabilitation funds segmented between:

       (1) The minimum amount of 15 percent required to be expended for projects to replace or rehabilitate highway bridges located on public road, other than those on a Federal-aid system,

       (2) the minimum amount of 65 percent required to be expended for projects to replace or rehabilitate highway bridges located on public highways on a Federal-aid system; and,

       (3) the remaining 20 percent that may be expended for projects to replace or rehabilitate highway bridges located on public highways on or off a Federal-aid highway system.

Attachment [SEE PRINTED COPY OF NOTICE FOR TABLES]