List of Exhibits
Executive Summary
Chapter 1
- Percent of Household-Based Vehicle Miles by Purpose, 1969–2009
- Average Commute Time and Distance by Mode
Chapter 2
- Percentage of Highway Miles, Bridges, and Vehicle Miles Traveled by Functional System
- Highway Functional Classification System
- Transit Urban Directional Route Miles by Mode (Millions of Miles)
- Transit Urban Passenger Miles by Mode (Millions of Miles)
Chapter 3
- Percent of NHS VMT on Pavements With Good and Acceptable Ride Quality, 2000–2008
- Percentage of NHS Bridges Classified as Deficient, 2001–2009
- 2008 Replacement Value of U.S. Transit Assets (Billions of Current Dollars)
- Distribution of Asset Physical Conditions by Asset Type for All Rail
Chapter 4
- Travel Time Index by Urbanized Area Size, 2000–2008
- Average Daily Percent of VMT Under Congested Conditions for All Urbanized Areas, 2000–2008
- Vehicle Occupancy Averages by Mode
- Change From 2000 to 2008 in Vehicle Revenue Miles by Mode (Millions of Miles)
- Change From 2000 to 2008 in Vehicle Revenue Miles per Active Vehicle
Chapter 5
- Highway Fatality Rates, 2000 to 2008
- Highway Injury Rates, 2000 to 2008
- Annual Transit Fatality (Non-Suicide/Homocide) Count and Rate, 2000–2008
- Annual Transit Incidents and Injuries by Mode, 2004–2008
Chapter 6
- Highway Expenditures by Type, 2008
- Revenue Sources for Highways, 2008
- 2008 Public Transit Revenue Sources (Billions of Dollars)
- 2008 Transit Capital Expenditures by Mode (Millions of Dollars)
Chapter 7
- Projected Changes in 2028 Highway Condition and Performance Measures Compared With 2008 Levels, for Different Spending Growth Rates Relative to 2008
- Impact of Sustaining Spending at 2008 Levels Through 2028 on Economic Bridge Investment Backlog
- 2008 Transit Capital Expenditures (Billions of Dollars)
Chapter 8
- Average Annual Investment Levels for Selected Highway Scenarios (Billions of 2008 Dollars)
- Impact of Investing at the State of Good Repair Benchmark Level on Pavement Ride Quality
- Annual Average Cost by Investment Scenario (2008–2028)
Chapter 9
- Cost of Maintaining System Components Versus Maintain Conditions and Performance Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways (Billions of 2008 Dollars)
- Potential Impact of Congestion Pricing on 2028 System Performance Measures Compared With 2008, for Different Average Annual Investment Levels
- Annual Change in Passenger Miles Traveled, All Urbanized and Rural Areas
Chapter 10
- Projected Changes in 2028 Average Speed Compared With 2008 for Different Spending Growth Rates and Two Constant Price VMT Growth Assumptions
- Impact of Alternative Replacement Condition Thresholds on Transit Preservation Investment Needs by Scenario
- Impact of Alternative Value of Time Rates for Selected Transit Scenarios (Billions of 2008 Dollars)
Main Report
- Exhibit 1-1 VMT by Age Group, 2000–2050
- Exhibit 1-2 Annual Trip Rates and Vehicle Ownership by Race and Ethnicity
- Exhibit 1-3 Key Demographic and Travel Characteristics of New Immigrants
- Exhibit 1-4 Immigrant Households with No Vehicle by Number of Years Residency in the U.S.
- Exhibit 1-5 Number of Persons Aged 15 Years and Older Added to the U.S. Population, 1910–2000, and Forecast for 2025
- Exhibit 1-6 Share of Drivers by Age Group, 1965–2005
- Exhibit 1-7 Measures Related to Growth of Vehicle Travel, 1969 and 2009
- Exhibit 1-8 Trends in Annual Person Trips per Household by Mode of Travel, 1977–2009
- Exhibit 1-9 Percent of Trips Made by Vehicle and Walking
- Exhibit 1-10 Most Important Issues for the Traveling Public
- Exhibit 1-11 Percent of Vehicle Trips Made on Interstates/Highways (Toll and Nontoll) for Specified Purposes
- Exhibit 1-12 Percent of Household-Based Vehicle Miles by Purpose, 1969–2009
- Exhibit 1-13 Average Commute Time and Distance by Mode
- Exhibit 1-14 Proportion of "Mandatory" and "Flexible" Morning and Evening Peak Vehicle Trips on Weekdays
- Exhibit 1-15 Percent of Household Vehicles by Vehicle Type
- Exhibit 1-16 Average Annual CO2 Emissions From Vehicle Travel by Household Characteristics
- Exhibit 2-1 Highway Miles by Owner and by Size of Area, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-2 Highway Functional Classification System Hierarchy
- Exhibit 2-3 Percentage of Highway Miles, Lane Miles, and VMT by Functional System and by Size of Area, 2008
- Exhibit 2-4 Highway Route Miles by Functional System, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-5 Highway Lane Miles by Functional System and by Size of Area, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-6 Annual VMT Growth Rates, 1978–2008
- Exhibit 2-7 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Passenger Miles Traveled (PMT), 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-8 Licensed Drivers, Vehicle Registrations, and Resident Population, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-9 Highway Travel by Functional System and by Vehicle Type, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-10 Federal-Aid Highway Miles, Lane Miles, and VMT, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-11 Highway Route Miles, Lane Miles, and VMT on the NHS Compared With All Roads, by Functional System, 2008
- Exhibit 2-12 NHS Mileage by Owner, 2008
- Exhibit 2-13 Interstate Highway Miles, Lane Miles, and VMT, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-14 Trucks and Truck Miles by Range of Operations
- Exhibit 2-15 Ton Miles by Truck, 2002
- Exhibit 2-16 Goods Movement by Mode, 2007
- Exhibit 2-17 Weight of Shipments by Transportation Mode (Millions of Tons)
- Exhibit 2-18 The Spectrum of Freight Moved in 2007
- Exhibit 2-19 Bridges by Owner, 2001–2009
- Exhibit 2-20 Bridge Inventory Characteristics for Ownership, Traffic, and Deck Area, 2009
- Exhibit 2-21 Number of Bridges by Functional System, 2001–2009
- Exhibit 2-22 Bridges by Functional System Weighted by Numbers, ADT, and Deck Area, 2009
- Exhibit 2-23 Number of Bridges by ADT, 2009
- Exhibit 2-24 Interstate, STRAHNET, and NHS Bridges Weighted by Numbers, ADT, and Deck Area, 2009
- Exhibit 2-25 Rail Modes Serving Urbanized Areas, by State
- Exhibit 2-26 Transit Active Fleet by Vehicle Type, 2008
- Exhibit 2-27 Composition of Urban Transit Road Vehicle Fleet, 2008
- Exhibit 2-28 Maintenance Facilities for Directly Operated Services, 2008
- Exhibit 2-29 Transit Rail Mileage and Stations, 2008
- Exhibit 2-30 Transit Urban Directional Route Miles, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-31 Rail Vehicle Revenue Miles, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-32 2008 Capacity-Equivalent Factors by Mode
- Exhibit 2-33 Capacity-Equivalent Revenue Vehicle Miles, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-34 2008 Unlinked Passenger Trips
- Exhibit 2-35 2008 Passenger Miles Traveled
- Exhibit 2-36 Transit Urban Passenger Miles, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 2-37 Transit Ridership Versus Employment
- Exhibit 2-38 Distribution of Rural and Urban Unlinked Passenger Trips Across the United States
- Exhibit 2-39 2008 Rural Transit Vehicles
- Exhibit 2-40 Urban Transit Operators' ADA Vehicle Fleets by Mode, 2008
- Exhibit 2-41 Urban Transit Operators' ADA-Compliant Stations by Mode, 2008
- Exhibit 2-42 Change in Percentage of Urban Bus Fleet Using Alternative Fuels, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 3-1 Pavement Condition Criteria
- Exhibit 3-2 Percent of NHS VMT on Pavements With Good and Acceptable Ride Quality, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 3-3 Percent of VMT on NHS Pavements With Good and Acceptable Ride Quality in Rural and Urban Areas, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 3-4 Percent of VMT on Pavements With Good and Acceptable Ride Quality, by Functional System, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 3-5 Percent of Mileage With Acceptable and Good Ride Quality, by Functional System, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 3-6 Lane Width by Functional Class, 2008
- Exhibit 3-7 Rural Alignment by Functional Class, 2008
- Exhibit 3-8 Bridge Condition Rating Categories
- Exhibit 3-9 Bridge Condition Ratings, 2009
- Exhibit 3-10 Culvert Condition Ratings, 2009
- Exhibit 3-11 Bridge Appraisal Rating Categories
- Exhibit 3-12 Structural Evaluation and Waterway Adequacy Appraisal Ratings, 2009
- Exhibit 3-13 Bridge Appraisal Ratings Based on Geometry and Function, 2009
- Exhibit 3-14 NHS Bridge Deficiences, 2001–2009
- Exhibit 3-15 Systemwide Bridge Deficiencies, 2001–2009
- Exhibit 3-16 Bridge Deficiences by Functional Class, 2001–2009
- Exhibit 3-17 Bridge Deficiencies by Owner, 2009
- Exhibit 3-18 Status of the Federal Bridge Inventory, 2009
- Exhibit 3-19 Bridges by Age Range, as of 2009
- Exhibit 3-20 Bridge Deficiencies by Period Built, as of 2009
- Exhibit 3-21 Definitions of Transit Asset Conditions
- Exhibit 3-22 Distribution of Asset Physical Conditions by Asset Type for All Modes
- Exhibit 3-23 Estimated Replacement Value of the Nation's Transit Assets, 2008
- Exhibit 3-24 Urban Transit Bus Fleet Count, Age, and Condition, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 3-25 Distribution of Estimated Asset Conditions by Asset Type for Bus
- Exhibit 3-26 Urban Transit Rail Fleet Count, Age, and Average Estimated Condition Rating, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 3-27 Distribution of Asset Physical Conditions by Asset Type for All Rail
- Exhibit 3-28 Distribution of Asset Physical Conditions by Asset Type for Heavy Rail
- Exhibit 3-29 Age of Rural Vehicles
- Exhibit 4-1 Sources of Congestion
- Exhibit 4-2 Average Daily Percentage of VMT Under Congested Conditions for All Urbanized Areas, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 4-3 Average Daily Percentage of VMT Under Congested Conditions, by Urbanized Area Size, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 4-4 Travel Time Index by Urbanized Area Size, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 4-5 Average Length of Congested Conditions, Urbanized Areas, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 4-6 National Congestion Measures, 1982–2007
- Exhibit 4-7 Average Truck Speeds on Selected Interstate Highways, 2009
- Exhibit 4-8 Fault Tree for Freeway Bottlenecks
- Exhibit 4-9 Average Transit Passenger-Carrying Speed, 2008
- Exhibit 4-10 Passenger-Mile Weighted Average Operating Speed by Mode
- Exhibit 4-11 Unadjusted Vehicle Occupancy: Passengers per Transit Vehicle, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 4-12 Percentage of Seats Occupied
- Exhibit 4-13 Vehicle Service Utilization: Vehicle Revenue Miles per Active Vehicle by Mode
- Exhibit 4-14 Distribution of Passengers by Wait-Time
- Exhibit 4-15 Passenger Wait-Time According to Household Income
- Exhibit 4-16 Average Distance Between Failures
- Exhibit 5-1 Crashes by Severity, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-2 Summary of Fatality and Injury Rates, 1966–2008
- Exhibit 5-3 Fatalities, 1980–2008
- Exhibit 5-4 Fatality Rates, 1980–2008
- Exhibit 5-5 Fatalities by Functional System, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-6 Fatality Rates by Functional System, 2000–2008 (per 100 Million VMT)
- Exhibit 5-7 Highway Fatalities by Crash Type, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-8 Comparison of Number of Fatalities and Fatality Rates for Vehicles Involved in Rollover Crashes, 2000 and 2008
- Exhibit 5-9 Intersection-Related Fatalities by Functional System, 2008
- Exhibit 5-10 Pedestrian and Other Nonmotorist Traffic Fatalities, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-11 Alcohol-Related Fatalities, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-12 Fatalities for Vehicle Occupants by Type of Vehicle, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-13 Injuries for Vehicle Occupants by Type of Vehicle, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-14 Motorcycle Fatalities and Injuries per 100 Million VMT, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-15 Annual Transit Fatalities (Non-Suicide/Homicide), 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-16 Annual Incidents and Injuries, 2004–2008
- Exhibit 5-17 Injuries and Fatalities for Significant Accidents, 2008–2010
- Exhibit 5-18 Annual Transit Fatality Rates by Highway Mode, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-19 Annual Fatality Rates by Rail Mode, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 5-20 Transit Incidents and Injuries by Mode, 2004–2008
- Exhibit 5-21 Fatalities per 100 Incidents by Mode, 2004–2008
- Exhibit 5-22 Annual Transit Suicide and Homicide Fatalities, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-1 Government Revenue Sources for Highways, 2008
- Exhibit 6-2 Highway Trust Fund Highway Account Receipts and Outlays, Fiscal Years 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-3 Disposition of Highway-User Revenue by Level of Government, 2008
- Exhibit 6-4 Government Revenue Sources for Highways, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-5 Percent of Highway Revenue Derived From User Charges, Each Level of Government, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-6 Direct Expenditures for Highways, by Expending Agencies and by Type, 2008
- Exhibit 6-7 Expenditures for Highways by Type, All Units of Government, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-8 Funding for Highways by Level of Government, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-9 Highway Capital, Noncapital, and Total Expenditures in Current and Constant 2008 Dollars, All Units of Government, 1988–2008
- Exhibit 6-10 Highway Expenditures Funded by Federal and Non-Federal Sources, in Current and Constant 2008 Dollars, 1988–2008
- Exhibit 6-11 Highway Capital Outlay by Improvement Type, 2008
- Exhibit 6-12 Distribution of Capital Outlay by Improvement Type and Functional System, 2008
- Exhibit 6-13 Capital Outlay on All Roads by Improvement Type, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-14 Capital Outlay on Federal-Aid Highways, by Improvement Type, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-15 Capital Outlay on the NHS, by Improvement Type, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-16 Capital Outlay on the Interstate System, by Improvement Type, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-17 2008 Revenue Sources for Transit Financing
- Exhibit 6-18 2008 Public Transit Revenue Sources (Billions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-19 2008 State Sources of Transit Funding (Millions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-20 2008 Local Sources of Transit Funding (Millions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-21 Average Fares and Costs per Mile—Top 10 Transit Systems, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-22 Public Funding for Transit by Government Jurisdiction, 1990–2008
- Exhibit 6-23 Current and Constant 2008 Dollar Funding for Public Transportation
- Exhibit 6-24 Sources of Funds for Transit Capital Expenditures, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-25 2008 Transit Capital Expenditures by Mode and Type
- Exhibit 6-26 Sources of Funds for Transit Operating Expenditures, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-27 Transit Operating Expenditures by Mode, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-28 2008 Operating Expenditures by Mode and Type of Cost
- Exhibit 6-29 Operating Expenditures per Vehicle Revenue Mile, 2000–2008 (Current Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-30 Growth in Operating Costs—Top 10 Transit Systems, 2000–2008
- Exhibit 6-31 Operating Expenditures per Capacity-Equivalent Vehicle Revenue Mile by Mode, 2000–2008 (Current Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-32 Operating Expenditures per Passenger Mile, 2000–2008 (Current Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-33 Farebox Recovery Ratio by Mode, 2004–2008
- Exhibit 6-34 Rural Transit Operators' Budget Sources for Operating Expenditures, 2008
- Exhibit 7-1 Portion of 2008 Capital Expenditures Equivalent to Investment Types Modeled in HERS and NBIAS (Billions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 7-2 Benefit-Cost Ratio Cutoff Points Associated With Different Possible Funding Levels for Federal-Aid Highways
- Exhibit 7-3 Description of Eight Alternative HERS-Modeled Investment Levels Selected for Further Analysis
- Exhibit 7-4 Minimum and Average Benefit-Cost Ratios for Different Possible Funding Levels for Federal-Aid Highways
- Exhibit 7-5 Projected 2028 Pavement Ride Quality Indicators on Federal-Aid Highways Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-6 Projected 2028 Highway Operational Performance Indicators on Federal-Aid Highways Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-7 Projected Changes in 2028 Highway Travel Delay on Federal-Aid Highways Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-8 Projected Changes in 2028 Highway User Costs on Federal-Aid Highways Compared With 2008 Levels, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-9 Analysis of User Cost Savings in 2028 Relative to 2008 at Average VMT Projected for 2028, Federal-Aid Highways
- Exhibit 7-10 Alternative Scenario Targets for Federal-Aid Highways: Maintaining Adjusted User Costs Versus Maintaining Average Speed
- Exhibit 7-11 Alternative Funding Levels Analyzed for the NHS in HERS
- Exhibit 7-12 Projected 2028 Pavement Ride Quality Indicators on the NHS Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-13 Projected Changes in 2028 Speed, Delay, and Highway User Costs on the NHS Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-14 Alternative Funding Levels Analyzed for the Interstate System in HERS
- Exhibit 7-15 Projected 2028 Pavement Ride Quality Indicators on the Interstate System Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-16 Projected Changes in 2028 Speed, Delay, and Highway User Costs on the Interstate System Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-17 Projected Changes in 2028 Economic Bridge Investment Backlog for All Bridges Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-18 Projected Changes in 2028 Economic Bridge Investment Backlog on Federal-Aid Highways Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-19 Projected Changes in 2028 Economic Bridge Investment Backlog on the NHS Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-20 Projected Changes in 2028 Economic Bridge Investment Backlog on the Interstate System Compared With 2008, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-21 2008 Transit Capital Expenditures (Billions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 7-22 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2028 Transit Conditions (All Urbanized and Rural Areas)
- Exhibit 7-23 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2028 Transit SGR Backlog (All Urbanized and Rural Areas)
- Exhibit 7-24 New Ridership Supported in 2028 by Expansion Investments (All Urbanized and Rural Areas)
- Exhibit 7-25 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2028 Transit Conditions (Over 1 Million in Population)
- Exhibit 7-26 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2028 Transit SGR Backlog (Over 1 Million in Population)
- Exhibit 7-27 New Ridership Supported in 2028 by Expansion Investments (Over 1 Million in Population)
- Exhibit 7-28 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2028 Transit Conditions (Under 1 Million in Population)
- Exhibit 7-29 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2028 Transit SGR Backlog (Under 1 Million in Population)
- Exhibit 7-30 New Ridership Supported in 2028 by Expansion Investments (Under 1 Million in Population)
- Exhibit 8-1 Definitions of Selected Federal-Aid Highway Capital Investment Scenarios, and Average Annual Investment Levels for 2009 to 2028 Associated With Scenario Components
- Exhibit 8-2 Selected Federal-Aid Highway Capital Investment Scenarios for 2009 to 2028: Comparisons With 2008 Spending and Projected Federal-Aid Highway Performance Indicators
- Exhibit 8-3 Distribution of Capital Improvement Types for Selected Federal-Aid Highway Capital Investment Scenarios for 2009 to 2028
- Exhibit 8-4 Sustain Current Spending Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways: Distribution of Average Annual Investment for 2009 to 2028 Compared With Actual 2008 Spending, by Functional Class and Improvement Type
- Exhibit 8-5 Maintain Conditions and Performance Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways: Distribution of Average Annual Investment for 2009 to 2028, by Functional Class and Improvement Type
- Exhibit 8-6 Intermediate Improvement Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways: Distribution of Average Annual Investment for 2009 to 2028, by Functional Class and Improvement Type
- Exhibit 8-7 Improve Conditions and Performance Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways: Distribution of Average Annual Investment for 2009 to 2028 Compared With Actual 2008 Spending, by Functional Class and Improvement Type
- Exhibit 8-8 Definitions of Selected Systemwide Capital Investment Scenarios, and Average Annual Investment Levels for 2009 to 2028 Associated With Scenario Components
- Exhibit 8-9 Selected Systemwide Highway Capital Investment Scenarios for 2009 to 2028: Comparisons With 2008 Spending and Projected Systemwide Highway Performance Indicators
- Exhibit 8-10 Distribution of Capital Improvement Types for Selected Systemwide Highway Capital Investment Scenarios for 2009 to 2028
- Exhibit 8-11 Definitions of Selected NHS Capital Investment Scenarios, and Average Annual Investment Levels for 2009 to 2028 Associated With Scenario Components
- Exhibit 8-12 Selected NHS Capital Investment Scenarios for 2009 to 2028: Comparisons With 2008 Spending and Projected NHS Performance Indicators
- Exhibit 8-13 Distribution of Capital Improvement Types for Selected NHS Capital Investment Scenarios for 2009 to 2028
- Exhibit 8-14 Definitions of Selected Interstate Highway System Capital Investment Scenarios, and Average Annual Investment Levels for 2009 to 2028 Associated With Scenario Components
- Exhibit 8-15 Selected Interstate Highway System Capital Investment Scenarios for 2009 to 2028: Comparisons With 2008 Spending and Projected Interstate Highway System Performance Indicators
- Exhibit 8-16 Distribution of Capital Improvement Types for Selected Interstate Highway System Capital Investment Scenarios for 2009 to 2028
- Exhibit 8-17 2010 C&P Analysis Scenarios for Transit
- Exhibit 8-18 Annual Average Cost by Investment Scenario (2008–2028)
- Exhibit 8-19 Annual Transit Capital Expenditures, 2004 to 2008 (Billions of YOE Dollars)
- Exhibit 8-20 Sustain Current Spending Scenario: Average Annual Investment by Asset Type, 2008–2028 (Billions of 2008 Dollars)
- Exhibit 8-21 Sustain Current Spending Scenario: Over-Age Forecast by Asset Category, 2008–2028
- Exhibit 8-22 Investment Backlog: Sustain Current Spending ($11.0 Billion Annually)
- Exhibit 8-23 Sustain Current Spending Scenario: Capacity Utilization by Mode Forecast, 2008–2028
- Exhibit 8-24 Projected Versus Currently Supported Ridership Growth
- Exhibit 8-25 SGR Benchmark: Average Annual Investment by Asset Type, 2008–2028 (Billions of 2008 Dollars)
- Exhibit 8-26 Investment Backlog: SGR Benchmark ($18.0 Billion Annually)
- Exhibit 8-27 Proportion of Transit Assets Not in SGR (Excluding Tunnel Structures)
- Exhibit 8-28 Percent Reduction in Revenue Service Disruptions Relative to 2008 for SGR Benchmark
- Exhibit 8-29 Low and High Growth Scenarios: Average Annual Investment by Asset Type, 2008–2028 (Billions of 2008 Dollars)
- Exhibit 8-30 Scenario Investment Benefits Scorecard
- Exhibit 9-1 Selected Highway Investment Scenario Projections Compared With Comparable Data From the 2008 C&P Report (Billions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 9-2 Average Annual Highway and Bridge Investment Scenario Estimates Versus Current Spending, 1997 to 2010 C&P Reports
- Exhibit 9-3 Primary 1989 C&P Report Investment Scenario Estimates Versus Cumulative Spending, 1987 Through 2005
- Exhibit 9-4 Percent of Mileage With Good and Acceptable Ride Quality, by Functional System, for 1985 and 2005
- Exhibit 9-5 Systemwide Bridge Deficiencies, 1986 and 2006
- Exhibit 9-6 Average Daily Percentage of VMT Under Congested Conditions for All Urbanized Areas, 1987–2005
- Exhibit 9-7 1999 C&P Report Investment Scenario Estimates Versus Cumulative Spending, 1998 Through 2008
- Exhibit 9-8 Percent of VMT on Pavements With Good and Acceptable Ride Quality, by Functional System, 1997 and 2008
- Exhibit 9-9 Bridge Deficiencies by Functional System, 1998 and 2009
- Exhibit 9-10 Average Daily Percentage of VMT Under Congested Conditions for All Urbanized Areas, 1997–2008
- Exhibit 9-11 Comparison of Capital Investment Scenarios With Recent System Performance for Selected Indicators
- Exhibit 9-12 Illustration of Potential Impact of Alternative Inflation Rates on Selected Systemwide Investment Scenarios
- Exhibit 9-13 Cost of Maintaining System Components Compared With the Cost to Maintain Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways for 2009 to 2028
- Exhibit 9-14 Estimated Highway and Bridge Investment Backlog as of 2008
- Exhibit 9-15 Distribution of Spending Among 5-Year HERS Analysis Periods and Projected Impacts on Average Speeds, for Alternative Approaches to Investment Timing
- Exhibit 9-16 Distribution of Spending Among 5-Year Periods in NBIAS and Projected Impacts on the Bridge Investment Backlog, for Alternative Approaches to Investment Timing
- Exhibit 9-17 Impact of Alternative Revenue Mechanisms and Congestion Pricing Assumptions on the Level of Potentially Cost-Beneficial HERS-Modeled Investment and on Selected Performance Indicators
- Exhibit 9-18 Impact of Alternative Revenue Mechanisms and Congestion Pricing Assumptions on Selected Performance Indicators, Assuming a Uniform Level of Capital Spending
- Exhibit 9-19 Impact of Alternative Operations Strategies Deployment Rate Assumptions on the Level of Potentially Cost-Beneficial HERS-Modeled Investment and on Selected Performance Indicators
- Exhibit 9-20 Impact of Alternative Bridge Management Strategies on the Projected System Rehabilitation Investment Backlog for All Bridges
- Exhibit 9-21 Asset Condition Forecast for All Transit Assets: Includes Both Existing and Expansion Assets
- Exhibit 9-22 Comparison of Expected Useful Service Life Consumed for All Transit Assets, by Component
- Exhibit 9-23 Passenger Miles Traveled, All Urbanized and Rural Areas
- Exhibit 9-24 Passenger Miles Traveled, UZAs Over 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 9-25 Passenger Miles Traveled, UZAs Under 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 9-26 Predicted Versus Actual Capital Reinvestment
- Exhibit 9-27 Predicted Versus "Actual" Asset Conditions as of 2009
- Exhibit 9-28 Summary of TERM Prediction Tests: Capital Reinvestment
- Exhibit 9-29 Predicted Versus Actual Capital Expansion Investment
- Exhibit 9-30 Vehicle Capacity Utilization Rates for Rail and Bus (From NTD)
- Exhibit 9-31 Predicted Versus Actual Capital Expansion
- Exhibit 9-32 Summary of TERM Prediction Tests: Expansion Investments
- Exhibit 10-1 Retail Gasoline and Consumer Price Indices (1982–1984 = 100)
- Exhibit 10-2 Annual Projected Highway VMT Based on HPMS Forecasts
- Exhibit 10-3 Impact of Alternative HERS Constant Price Travel Growth Forecasts on Selected Indicators, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-4 Impact of Alternative NBIAS Travel Growth Forecasts on Projected Economic Bridge Investment Backlog in 2028, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-5 Impact of Alternative HERS Fuel Price Assumptions on Selected Indicators, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-6 Impact of Alternative HERS Construction Cost Index Assumptions on Selected Indicators, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-7 Impact of Alternative HERS Value of a Statistical Life Assumptions on Selected Indicators, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-8 Impact of Alternative NBIAS Value of a Statistical Life Assumptions on Projected Economic Bridge Investment Backlog in 2028, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-9 Impact of Alternative HERS Value of Time Assumptions on Selected Indicators, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-10 Impact of Alternative NBIAS Value of Time Assumptions on Projected Economic Bridge Investment Backlog in 2028, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-11 Impact of Alternative HERS Reliability Premium Assumptions on Selected Indicators, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-12 Impact of Alternative HERS Travel Demand Elasticity Values on Selected Indicators, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-13 Impact of Alternative HERS Discount Rates on Selected Indicators, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-14 Impact of Alternative NBIAS Discount Rates on Projected Economic Bridge Investment Backlog in 2028, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-15 Impact of Alternative HERS High-Cost Transportation Capacity Improvement Assumptions on Selected Indicators, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 10-16 Impact of Alternative Replacement Condition Thresholds on Transit Preservation Investment Needs by Scenario (Excludes Expansion Impacts)
- Exhibit 10-17 Impact of an Increase in Capital Costs on Transit Investment Estimates by Scenario
- Exhibit 10-18 Impact of Alternative Value of Time Rates on Transit Investment Estimates by Scenario
- Exhibit 10-19 Impact of Alternative Discount Rates on Transit Investment Estimates by Scenario
- Exhibit 11-1 GHG Emissions
- Exhibit 11-2 CO2 Emissions per Passenger Mile Traveled
- Exhibit 11-3 CO2 Emissions per Passenger Mile Traveled for Selected U.S. Heavy Rail Systems
- Exhibit 11-4 Summary of Other Sustainability Strategies
- Exhibit 13-1 Passenger Fatality Rate per 100 Million Passenger Miles, 2002–2008
- Exhibit 13-2 Passenger Injury Rate per 100 Million Passenger Miles, 2002–2008
- Exhibit 13-3 Distribution of Expenditures in Location-Efficient and Auto-Dependent Environments
- Exhibit 13-4 Economic Benefits of Location Efficiency
- Exhibit 13-5 Change in Patterns of Land Use in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, 1948 and 2002
- Exhibit 13-6 Potential Livability Performance Measures
- Exhibit A-1 Social Marginal Cost per Metric Ton of CO2 Emission Estimates, in Constant 2008 Dollars
- Exhibit A-2 Types of Operations Strategies Included in Each Scenario
- Exhibit A-3 Impacts of Operations Strategies in HERS (Highway Economic Requirements System)
- Exhibit A-4 Typical Costs per Lane Mile Assumed in HERS, by Type of Improvements