Introduction
Executive Summary
Chapter Overviews
Chapter 1
- Average Annual Person Miles per Household by Trip Purpose
- Age of Household Vehicles
- Weight of Shipments by Transportation Mode (Millions of Tons)
Chapter 2
- 2010 Mileage and Bridges by Owner
- 2010 Percentage of Highway Miles, Bridges, and Vehicle Miles Traveled by Functional System
- Annual U.S. Unlinked Transit Passenger Trips, 1995–2011
Chapter 3
- Percent of Federal-aid Highway VMT on Pavements With Good and Acceptable Ride Quality
- Percentage of NHS Bridges Classified as Deficient, 2000–2010
- Distribution of Asset Physical Conditions by Asset Type for All Rail
Chapter 4
- Highway Fatality Rates, 2000 to 2010
- Highway Fatalities by Crash Type, 2000 to 2010
- Annual Transit Fatality Rates by Highway Mode, 2002–2010
- Annual Transit Fatality Rates by Rail Mode, 2002–2010
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
- Revenue Sources for Highways, 2010
- Highway Expenditure by Type, 2010
- Applications of Federal Funds for Transit Operating and Capital Expenditures, 2000–2010
Chapter 7
- Projected Change in 2030 Average Delay per VMT Compared With 2010 Levels, for Various Spending Levels Under Forecast and Trend VMT Growth
- Comparison of Current and Needed Annual Investment to Support Asset Preservation and Capacity Expansion in All Urbanized and Rural Areas
- Impact of Preservation Investment on 2030 Transit State of Good Repair Backlog in All Urbanized and Rural Areas
Chapter 8
- Average Annual Cost by Investment Scenario (Billions of 2010 Dollars)
- Annual Average Cost by Investment Scenario (2010–2030)
Chapter 9
- Gap Between Average Annual Investment Scenarios and Base Year Spending, as Identified in the 1997 to 2013 C&P Reports
- Illustration of Potential Impact of Inflation on the Improve Conditions and Performance Scenario
- Causes of the Increase in the SGR Backlog between the 2010 C&P Report and the 2013 C&P Report
- Hybrid and Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Share of Total Bus Fleet, 2000–2010
Chapter 10
- Impact of Alternative Assumptions on Highway Scenario Average Annual Investment Levels (Billions of 2010 Dollars)
- Impact of Alternative Replacement Condition Thresholds on Transit Preservation Investment Needs by Scenario (Excludes Expansion Impacts)
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
- Fuel Cell Electric Buses Operating in the United States, 2006–2012
- Fuel Cell Electric Bus Demonstration Sites
Main Report
- Exhibit 1-1 VMT by Type of Travel
- Exhibit 1-2 Summary Statistics on Total Travel, 1990–2009 NHTS (Millions)
- Exhibit 1-3 Total Annual Household VMT (Billions)
- Exhibit 1-4 Summary of Daily Travel Statistics, 1969–2009 NHTS
- Exhibit 1-5 Annual Person Trips and Person Miles per Capita by Urban/Rural Residence
- Exhibit 1-6 Average Annual Person Miles and Person Trips per Household by Trip Purpose
- Exhibit 1-7 Number of Vehicle Trips by Start Time and Trip Purpose
- Exhibit 1-8 Percentage Agreement Between Usual Mode to Work and Actual Commute Mode on Travel Day
- Exhibit 1-9 Average Daily Person Trips and Miles per Person
- Exhibit 1-10 Average Daily Miles and Daily Trips per Person by Age
- Exhibit 1-11 Household Size and Vehicles Owned over Time, 1969–2009 NHTS
- Exhibit 1-12 Age of Household Vehicles
- Exhibit 1-13 Annual VMT per Person by Trip Purpose, Age, and Worker Status
- Exhibit 1-14 Impact of Population Density on Transportation Mode
- Exhibit 1-15 Walk and Transit Rates by Area Type
- Exhibit 1-16 Distribution of Person Trips and Person Miles by Mode and Household Vehicles
- Exhibit 1-17 Characteristics of Zero-Vehicle Households
- Exhibit 1-18 Person Miles by Private Vehicle, Transit, and Walk by Age and Travel Disability
- Exhibit 1-19 Percent of Person Trips by Selected Purpose During Peak and Off-Peak Hours
- Exhibit 1-20 Average Gas Price per Month and Daily VMT per Driver, 2001–2002 and 2008–2009
- Exhibit 1-21 Goods Movement by Mode, 2007
- Exhibit 1-22 Tonnage on Highways, Railroads, and Inland Waterways, 2007
- Exhibit 1-23 Average Daily Long-Haul Freight Truck Traffic on the National Highway System, 2007
- Exhibit 1-24 Weight of Shipments by Transportation Mode (Millions of Tons)
- Exhibit 1-25 Average Daily Long-Haul Freight Truck Traffic on the National Highway System, 2040
- Exhibit 1-26 The Spectrum of Freight Moved in 2007
- Exhibit 1-27 Major Truck Routes on the National Highway System, 2007
- Exhibit 1-28 Trucks and Truck Miles by Range of Operations
- Exhibit 1-29 U.S. Ton-Miles of Freight (BTS Special Tabulation) (Millions)
- Exhibit 2-1 Highway Miles by Owner and by Size of Area, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 2-2 Revised Highway Functional Classification
- Exhibit 2-3 Cumulative Percentage Distributions of Mileage by AADT Volume, by Functional System
- Exhibit 2-4 Percentage of Highway Miles, Lane Miles, and VMT by Functional System
- Exhibit 2-5 Highway Route Miles by Functional System, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 2-6 Highway Lane Miles by Functional System and by Size of Area, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 2-7 Annual VMT Growth Rates, 1990–2010
- Exhibit 2-8 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Passenger Miles Traveled (PMT), 2000–2010
- Exhibit 2-9 Highway Travel by Functional System and by Vehicle Type, 2008–2010
- Exhibit 2-10 Federal-Aid Highway Miles, Lane Miles, and VMT, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 2-11 Highway Route Miles, Lane Miles, and VMT on the NHS Compared With All Roads, by Functional System, 2010
- Exhibit 2-12 Interstate Highway Miles, Lane Miles, and VMT, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 2-13 National Network for Conventional Combination Trucks, 2009
- Exhibit 2-14 Bridges by Owner, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 2-15 Bridge Inventory Characteristics for Ownership, Traffic, and Deck Area, 2010
- Exhibit 2-16 Interstate, STRAHNET, and NHS Bridges Weighted by Numbers, ADT, and Deck Area, 2010
- Exhibit 2-17 Number of Bridges by Functional System, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 2-18 Bridges by Functional System Weighted by Numbers, ADT, and Deck Area, 2010
- Exhibit 2-19 Number of Bridges by Functional Class and ADT Group, 2010
- Exhibit 2-20 Rail Modes Serving Urbanized Areas
- Exhibit 2-21 Transit Active Fleet by Vehicle Type, 2010
- Exhibit 2-22 Composition of Urban Transit Road Vehicle Fleet, 2010
- Exhibit 2-23 Maintenance Facilities for Directly Operated Services, 2010
- Exhibit 2-24 Transit Rail Mileage and Stations, 2010
- Exhibit 2-25 Rural Transit Vehicles, 2010
- Exhibit 2-26 Urban Transit Operators' ADA Vehicle Fleets by Mode, 2010
- Exhibit 2-27 Urban Transit Operators' ADA-Compliant Stations by Mode, 2010
- Exhibit 2-28 Percentage of Urban Bus Fleet Using Alternative Fuels, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 2-29 Hybrid Buses as a Percentage of Urban Bus Fleet, 2005–2010
- Exhibit 3-1 Pavement Condition Criteria
- Exhibit 3-2 Percent of NHS VMT on Pavements With Good and Acceptable Ride Quality, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 3-3 Percent of VMT on Pavements with Good and Acceptable Ride Quality, by Functional System, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 3-4 Percent of Mileage with Acceptable and Good Ride Quality, by Functional System, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 3-5 Lane Width by Functional Class, 2008
- Exhibit 3-6 Rural Alignment by Functional Class, 2008
- Exhibit 3-7 Bridge Condition Rating Categories
- Exhibit 3-8 Bridge Condition Ratings, 2010
- Exhibit 3-9 Bridge Appraisal Rating
- Exhibit 3-10 Bridge Appraisal Ratings Based on Geometry and Function, 2010
- Exhibit 3-11 Systemwide Bridge Deficiencies, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 3-12 NHS Bridge Deficiencies, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 3-13 STRAHNET-Deficient Bridges
- Exhibit 3-14 Bridge Deficiencies by Functional Class, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 3-15 Bridge Deficiencies by Owner, 2010
- Exhibit 3-16 Bridges by Age Range, as of 2010
- Exhibit 3-17 Bridge Deficiencies by Period Built, as of 2010
- Exhibit 3-18 Definitions of Transit Asset Conditions
- Exhibit 3-19 Distribution of Asset Physical Conditions by Asset Type for All Modes
- Exhibit 3-20 Estimated Replacement Value of the Nation's Transit Assets, 2010
- Exhibit 3-21 Urban Transit Bus Fleet Count, Age, and Condition, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 3-22 Age Distribution of Buses and Vans, 2010
- Exhibit 3-23 Distribution of Estimated Asset Conditions by Asset Type for Bus
- Exhibit 3-24 Urban Transit Rail Fleet Count, Age, and Condition, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 3-25 Age Distribution of Rail Transit Vehicles, 2010
- Exhibit 3-26 Distribution of Asset Physical Conditions by Asset Type for All Rail
- Exhibit 3-27 Distribution of Asset Physical Conditions by Asset Type for Heavy Rail
- Exhibit 3-28 Age Distribution of Rural Transit Vehicles, 2010
- Exhibit 4-1 Crashes by Severity, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 4-2 Summary of Fatality and Injury Rates, 1966–2010
- Exhibit 4-3 Fatalities Related to Motor Vehicle Operation, 1980–2010
- Exhibit 4-4 Fatality Rates, 1980–2010
- Exhibit 4-5 Highway Fatalities by Crash Type, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 4-6 Intersection-Related Fatalities by Functional System, 2010
- Exhibit 4-7 Pedestrian and Other Nonmotorist Traffic Fatalities, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 4-8 Fatalities by Functional System, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 4-9 Fatalities by Functional System, 2000–2010 (per 100 Million VMT)
- Exhibit 4-10 Annual Transit Fatalities Excluding Suicides, 2002–2010
- Exhibit 4-11 Transit Fatality Rates by Person Type, 2002–2010, per 100 Million PMT
- Exhibit 4-12 Annual Transit Fatalities Including Suicides, 2002–2010
- Exhibit 4-13 Transit Injury Rates by Person Type, 2002–2010, per 100 Million PMT
- Exhibit 4-14 Annual Transit Fatality Rates by Highway Mode, 2002–2010
- Exhibit 4-15 Annual Transit Fatality Rates by Rail Mode, 2002–2010
- Exhibit 4-16 Transit Incidents and Injuries by Mode, 2004–2010
- Exhibit 4-17 Commuter Rail Fatalities, 2002–2010
- Exhibit 4-18 Commuter Rail Incidents, 2002–2010
- Exhibit 4-19 Commuter Rail Injuries, 2002–2010
- Exhibit 5-1 Potential Livability Performance Measures
- Exhibit 5-2 Sources of Congestion
- Exhibit 5-3 Peak-Period Congestion on High-Volume Truck Portions of the National Highway System, 2007
- Exhibit 5-4 Average Truck Speeds on Selected Interstate Highways, 2010
- Exhibit 5-5 Peak-Period Congestion on High-Volume Truck Portions of the National Highway System, 2040
- Exhibit 5-6 Average Speeds for Passenger-Carrying Transit Modes, 2010
- Exhibit 5-7 Unadjusted Vehicle Occupancy: Passengers per Transit Vehicle, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 5-8 Average Seat Occupancy Calculations for Passenger-Carrying Transit Modes, 2010
- Exhibit 5-9 Vehicle Service Utilization: Vehicle Revenue Miles per Active Vehicle by Mode
- Exhibit 5-10 Distribution of Passengers by Wait-Time
- Exhibit 5-11 Share of Working-Age Residents With Access to Transit, 100 Metropolitan Areas
- Exhibit 5-12 Mean Distance Between Failures, 2004–2010
- Exhibit 5-13 Transit Urban Directional Route Miles, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 5-14 Rail and Nonrail Vehicle Revenue Miles, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 5-15 Capacity-Equivalent Factors by Mode
- Exhibit 5-16 Capacity-Equivalent Vehicle Revenue Miles, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 5-17 Unlinked Passenger Trips (Total in Billions and Percent of Total) by Mode, 2010
- Exhibit 5-18 Passenger Miles Traveled (Total in Billions and Percent of Total) by Mode, 2010
- Exhibit 5-19 Transit Urban Passenger Miles, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 5-20 Transit Ridership versus Employment, 2006–2011
- Exhibit 5-21 Washington, DC, Transit Mode Share, 2007–2011
- Exhibit 6-1 Government Revenue Sources for Highways, 2010
- Exhibit 6-2 Disposition of Highway-User Revenue by Level of Government, 2010
- Exhibit 6-3 Highway Trust Fund Highway Account Receipts and Outlays, Fiscal Years 2000–2011
- Exhibit 6-4 Government Revenue Sources for Highways, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-5 Percent of Highway Revenue Derived From User Charges, Each Level of Government, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-6 Direct Expenditures for Highways, by Expending Agencies and by Type, 2010
- Exhibit 6-7 Expenditures for Highways by Type, All Units of Government, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-8 Funding for Highways by Level of Government, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-9 Highway Capital, Noncapital, and Total Expenditures in Current and Constant 2010 Dollars, All Units of Government, 1990–2010
- Exhibit 6-10 Highway Expenditures Funded by Federal and Non-Federal Sources, in Current and Constant 2010 Dollars, 1990–2010
- Exhibit 6-11 Comparison of Inflation Indices (Converted to a 2003 Base Year), 1990–2010
- Exhibit 6-12 Highway Capital Outlay by Improvement Type, 2010
- Exhibit 6-13 Distribution of Capital Outlay by Improvement Type and Functional System, 2010
- Exhibit 6-14 Capital Outlay on All Roads by Improvement Type, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-15 Comparison of FHWA Expenditures by Type, Prior to and During the Recovery Act
- Exhibit 6-16 Capital Outlay on Federal-Aid Highways, by Improvement Type, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-17 Capital Outlay on the NHS, by Improvement Type, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-18 Capital Outlay on the Interstate System, by Improvement Type, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-19 2010 Revenue Sources for Transit Funding
- Exhibit 6-20 2010 Public Transit Revenue Sources (Billions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-21 Mass Transit Account Receipts and Outlays, Fiscal Years 2000–2011
- Exhibit 6-22 Recovery Act Funding Awards Compared to Other FTA Fund Awards
- Exhibit 6-23 State and Local Sources of Transit Funding (Millions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-24 Average Fares and Costs per Mile—Top 10 Transit Systems, 2000–2010 (Constant Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-25 Funding for Transit by Government Jurisdiction, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-26 Current and Constant Dollar Funding for Public Transportation (All Sources)
- Exhibit 6-27 Applications of Federal Funds for Transit Operating and Capital Expenditures, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-28 Sources of Funds (Billions of Dollars) for Transit Capital Expenditures, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-29 2010 Transit Capital Expenditures by Mode and Type
- Exhibit 6-30 Sources of Funds for Transit Operating Expenditures, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-31 Transit Operating Expenditures by Mode, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-32 Operating Expenditures by Mode and Type of Cost, 2010
- Exhibit 6-33 Rail Operating Expenditures by Type of Cost, Millions of Dollars
- Exhibit 6-34 2010 Nonrail Operating Expenditures by Type of Cost, Millions of Dollars
- Exhibit 6-35 Operating Expenditures per Vehicle Revenue Mile, 2000v2010 (Constant Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-36 Growth in Operating Costs–UZAs over 1 million, 2000–2010
- Exhibit 6-37 Operating Expenditures per Capacity-Equivalent Vehicle Revenue Mile by Mode, 2000–2010 (Constant Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-38 Operating Expenditures per Passenger Mile, 2000–2010 (Constant Dollars)
- Exhibit 6-39 Farebox Recovery Ratio by Mode, 2004–2010
- Exhibit 6-40 Rural Transit Funding Sources for Operating Expenditures, 2010
- Exhibit 7-1 Distribution of 2010 Capital Expenditures by Investment Type (Billions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 7-2 Annual Projected Highway VMT Based on HPMS Forecasts or Actual 15-Year Average Growth Trend
- Exhibit 7-3 Description of Ten Alternative HERS-Modeled Investment Levels Selected for Further Analysis
- Exhibit 7-4 Benefit-Cost Ratio Cutoff Points Associated With Different Possible Funding Levels for Federal-Aid Highways
- Exhibit 7-5 Minimum and Average Benefit-Cost Ratios (BCRs) for Different Possible Funding Levels for Federal-Aid Highways
- Exhibit 7-6 Projected 2030 Average Pavement Roughness on Federal-Aid Highways Compared with Base Year, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-7 Projected 2030 Pavement Ride Quality Indicators on Federal-Aid Highways Compared with 2010, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-8 Projected Changes in 2030 Highway Travel Delay and Speed on Federal-Aid Highways Compared with Base Year, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-9 Projected Changes in 2030 Highway Travel Delay and Speed on Federal-Aid Highways Compared with Base Year, for Different Possible Funding Levels, Assuming Trend-Based VMT Growth
- Exhibit 7-10 Projected 2030 Average Total User Costs and VMT on Federal-Aid Highways Compared with Base Year, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-11 Projected Changes in 2030 Average Highway User Costs on Federal-Aid Highways Compared With Base Year, for Different User Cost Components and Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-12 Projected 2030 Pavement Ride Quality Indicators on the NHS Compared with 2010, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-13 Projected Changes in 2030 Delay, Speed, and Highway User Costs on the NHS Compared with 2030 for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-14 Projected 2030 Pavement Ride Quality Indicators on the Interstate System Compared with 2010, for Different Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-15 Projected Changes in 2030 Speed, Delay, and Highway User Costs on the Interstate System Compared with 2010, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-16 Projected 2030 Bridge Condition Indicators for All Bridges, for Different Funding Scenarios
- Exhibit 7-17 Projected 2030 Bridge Condition Indicators for Bridges on Federal-Aid Highways, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-18 Projected 2030 Bridge Condition Indicators for Bridges on the NHS, for Different Possible Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-19 Projected 2030 Bridge Condition Indicators for Bridges on the Interstate System, for Different Funding Levels
- Exhibit 7-20 2010 Transit Capital Expenditures (Billions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 7-21 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2030 Transit State of Good Repair Backlog in All Urbanized and Rural Areas
- Exhibit 7-22 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2030 Transit Conditions in All Urbanized and Rural Areas
- Exhibit 7-23 New Ridership Supported in 2030 by Expansion Investments in All Urbanized and Rural Areas
- Exhibit 7-24 Impact of Level of Preservation Investment on 2030 Transit Conditions in Urbanized Areas Over 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 7-25 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2030 Transit State of Good Repair Backlog in Urbanized Areas Over 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 7-26 New Ridership Supported in 2030 by Expansion Investments in Urbanized Areas Over 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 7-27 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2030 Transit Conditions in Urbanized Areas Under 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 7-28 Impact of Preservation Investment on 2030 Transit State of Good Repair Backlog in Urbanized Areas Under 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 7-29 New Ridership Supported in 2030 by Expansion Investments in Urbanized Areas Under 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 8-1 Capital Investment Scenarios for Highways and Bridges, Derviation of Components
- Exhibit 8-2 Summary of Average Annual Investment Levels, by Scenario
- Exhibit 8-3 Systemwide Highway Capital Investment Scenarios for 2011 through 2030: Derivation and Distribution
- Exhibit 8-4 Systemwide Highway Capital Investment Scenarios for 2011 through 2030: Derivation and Distribution, Assuming Lower Trend-Based VMT Growth
- Exhibit 8-5 Systemwide Highway Capital Investment Scenarios for 2011 through 2030: Distribution by Capital Improvement Type Compared to 2010 Spending
- Exhibit 8-6 Projected Impact of Systemwide Capital Investment Scenarios on Average Bridge Sufficiency Rating in 2030
- Exhibit 8-7 Federal-Aid Highway Capital Investment Scenarios for 2011 through 2030: Derivation, Distribution, and Projected Impacts
- Exhibit 8-8 Federal-Aid Highway Capital Investment Scenarios for 2011 through 2030: Derivation, Distribution, and Projected Impacts, Assuming Lower Trend-Based VMT Growth
- Exhibit 8-9 Sustain 2010 Spending Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways: Distribution of Average Annual Investment for 2011 Through 2030 Compared With Actual 2010 Spending, by Functional Class and Improvement Type
- Exhibit 8-10 Maintain Conditions and Performance Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways: Distribution of Average Annual Investment for 2011 Through 2030 Compared With Actual 2010 Spending, by Functional Class and Improvement Type
- Exhibit 8-11 Intermediate Improvement Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways: Distribution of Average Annual Investment for 2011 Through 2030, Compared With Actual 2010 Spending, by Functional Class and Improvement Type
- Exhibit 8-12 Improve Conditions and Performance Scenario for Federal-Aid Highways: Distribution of Average Annual Investment for 2011 Through 2030 Compared With Actual 2010 Spending, by Functional Class and Improvement Type
- Exhibit 8-13 NHS Capital Investment Scenarios for 2011 through 2030: Derivation, Distribution, and Projected Impacts
- Exhibit 8-14 Interstate System Capital Investment Scenarios for 2011 through 2030: Derivation, Distribution, and Projected Impacts
- Exhibit 8-15 Estimated Highway and Bridge Investment Backlog as of 2010
- Exhibit 8-16 2010 C&P Analysis Scenarios for Transit
- Exhibit 8-17 Annual Average Cost by Investment Scenario (2010–2030)
- Exhibit 8-18 Annual Transit Capital Expenditures, 2004 to 2010 (Billions of Current-Year Dollars)
- Exhibit 8-19 Sustain 2010 Spending Scenario: Average Annual Investment by Asset Type, 2010–2030 (Billions of 2010 Dollars)
- Exhibit 8-20 Sustain 2010 Spending Scenario: Over-Age Forecast by Asset Category, 2010–2030
- Exhibit 8-21 Investment Backlog: Sustain 2010 Spending ($10.3 Billion Annually)
- Exhibit 8-22 Sustain 2010 Spending Scenario: Capacity Utilization by Mode Forecast, 2010–2030
- Exhibit 8-23 Projected Versus Currently Supported Ridership Growth
- Exhibit 8-24 SGR Benchmark: Average Annual Investment by Asset Type, 2010–2030 (Billions of 2010 Dollars)
- Exhibit 8-25 Investment Backlog: State of Good Repair Benchmark ($18.5 Billion Annually)
- Exhibit 8-26 Proportion of Transit Assets Not in State of Good Repair (Excluding Tunnel Structures)
- Exhibit 8-27 Percent Reduction in Revenue Service Disruptions Relative to 2010 for State of Good Repair Benchmark
- Exhibit 8-28 Low and High Growth Scenarios: Average Annual Investment by Asset Type, 2010–2030 (Billions of 2010 Dollars)
- Exhibit 8-29 Scenario Investment Benefits Scorecard
- Exhibit 9-1 Selected Highway Investment Scenario Projections Compared With Comparable Data From the 2010 C&P Report (Billions of Dollars)
- Exhibit 9-2 Comparison of Average Annual Highway and Bridge Investment Scenario Estimates With Base Year Spending, 1997 to 2013 C&P Reports
- Exhibit 9-3 1991 C&P Report Highway and Bridge Investment Scenario Estimates and Cumulative Spending, 1990 Through 2009
- Exhibit 9-4 Selected Pavement, Bridge, and Congestion Metrics, 1989, 2008, and 2010
- Exhibit 9-5 Illustration of Potential Impact of Alternative Inflation Rates on Selected Systemwide Investment Scenarios
- Exhibit 9-6 Distribution of Spending Among 5-Year HERS Analysis Periods and Projected Impacts on Average IRI and Average Delay, for Alternative Approaches to Investment Timing
- Exhibit 9-7 Distribution of Spending Among 5-Year Periods in NBIAS and Projected Impacts on the Average Bridge Sufficiency Rating, for Alternative Approaches to Investment Timing
- Exhibit 9-8 Asset Condition Forecast for All Existing and Expansion Transit Assets
- Exhibit 9-9 SGR Baseline Scenario: Asset Percent of Useful Life Consumed
- Exhibit 9-10 Sustain 2010 Spending Scenario: Asset Percent of Useful Life Consumed
- Exhibit 9-11 Low Growth Scenario: Asset Percent of Useful Life Consumed
- Exhibit 9-12 High Growth Scenario: Asset Percent of Useful Life Consumed
- Exhibit 9-13 Asset Condition Forecast for All Existing and Expansion Transit Assets Under Alternative Methodology
- Exhibit 9-14 Causes of the Increase in the Backlog between the 2010 C&P Report and the 2013 C&P Report
- Exhibit 9-15 Comparison of Projected Investment Needs for 2010 and 2013 C&P Report Investment Scenarios
- Exhibit 9-16 Passenger Miles Traveled, All Urbanized and Rural Areas
- Exhibit 9-17 Passenger Miles Traveled, UZAs over 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 9-18 Passenger Miles Traveled, UZAs Under 1 Million in Population
- Exhibit 9-19 Hybrid and Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Share of Total Bus Fleet, 2000–2030
- Exhibit 9-20 Impact of Shift to Vehicles Using Hybrid and Alternative Fuels on Investment Needs: Low Growth Scenario
- Exhibit 9-21 Impact of Shift from Diesel to Alternative Fuels and Hybrid Vehicles on Annual Investment Needs
- Exhibit 9-22 Impact of Shift to Vehicles Using Hybrid and Alternative Fuels on Backlog Estimate: Sustain 2010 Spending Scenario
- Exhibit 9-23 Projection of Fleet Size by Scenario
- Exhibit 9-24 Projection of Guideway Route Miles by Scenario
- Exhibit 9-25 Projection of Stations by Scenario
- Exhibit 9-26 Stock of Fixed Guideway Miles by Year Under Low Growth Scenario, 2010–2030
- Exhibit 10-1 Impact of Alternative Value of Time Assumptions on Highway Investment Scenario Average Annual Investment Levels
- Exhibit 10-2 Impact of Alternative Assumptions About Growth in the Real Value of Time on Highway Investment Scenario Average Annual Investment Levels
- Exhibit 10-3 Impact of Alternative Value of Life Assumptions on Highway Investment Scenario Average Annual Investment Levels
- Exhibit 10-4 Impact of Alternative Discount Rate Assumption on Highway Investment Scenario Average Annual Investment Levels
- Exhibit 10-5 Impact of Alternative Future Fuel Price Assumption on Highway Investment Scenario Average Annual Investment Levels
- Exhibit 10-6 Impact of Alternative Bridge Maintenance, Repair, and Rehabilitation Strategies on the Economic Bridge Investment Backlog and Future Capital Investment Scenarios
- Exhibit 10-7 Impact of Alternative Operations Strategies Deployment Rate Assumptions on Selected Performance Indicators and Highway Investment Scenarios
- Exhibit 10-8 Impact of Alternative Replacement Condition Thresholds on Transit Preservation Investment Needs by Scenario (Excludes Expansion Impacts)
- Exhibit 10-9 Impact of an Increase in Capital Costs on Transit Investment Estimates by Scenario
- Exhibit 10-10 Impact of Alternative Value of Time Rates on Transit Investment Estimates by Scenario
- Exhibit 10-11 Impact of Alternative Discount Rates on Transit Investment Estimates by Scenario
- Exhibit 11-1 Major Federal Lands
- Exhibit 11-2 Types of Lands Managed by Federal Land Management Agencies
- Exhibit 11-3 Summary of Annual Recreation Use and Visits
- Exhibit 11-4 Federal Land Use
- Exhibit 11-5 Economic Benefits of Federal Lands
- Exhibit 11-6 Roads Serving Federal Lands
- Exhibit 11-7 Forest Roads Pavement Condition (Paved Roads Only)
- Exhibit 11-8 Park Roads and Parkways Pavement Condition (Paved Roads Only)
- Exhibit 11-9 Wildlife Refuge Roads Condition
- Exhibit 11-10 BLM Roads Pavement Condition (Paved Roads Only)
- Exhibit 11-11 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Road Condition
- Exhibit 11-12 FLHP Annual Authorizations ($M)
- Exhibit 12-1 Selected Every Day Counts Initiatives
- Exhibit 12-2 Every Day Counts State-Based Structure
- Exhibit 12-3 Design-Build Process
- Exhibit 12-4 Construction-Manager—General Contractor Process
- Exhibit 12-5 Diverging Diamond Interchange
- Exhibit 12-6 3D Modeling
- Exhibit 12-7 Intelligent Compaction
- Exhibit 13-1 Diagram of Fuel Cell Operation
- Exhibit 13-2 Progress Toward Achieving Technical Performance Objectives
- Exhibit 13-3 Fuel Cell Electric Buses Operating in the United States, 2006–2012
- Exhibit 13-4 Fuel Cell Electric Bus Demonstration Sites
- Exhibit 13-5 Fuel Cell Bus Configurations
- Exhibit A-1 Types of Operations Strategies Included in Each Scenario
- Exhibit A-2 Impacts of Operations Strategies in HERS
- Exhibit A-3 Typical Costs per Lane Mile Assumed in HERS, by Type of Improvement
- Exhibit A-4 Estimated 2010 Values of Travel Time by Vehicle Type
- Exhibit C-1 Definitions of Transit Asset Conditions
- Exhibit C-2 Scale for Determining Asset Condition Over Time, From Acquisition to Replacement
- Exhibit C-3 Distribution of Asset Physical Condition by Asset Type for All Modes
- Exhibit C-4 Weighted Average by Asset Category, 2010–2029
- Exhibit C-5 Assets in Marginal or Poor Condition, 2010–2029
- Exhibit C-6 TERM Asset Decay Curve for 40-Foot Buses