| 1. Report No. FHWA-HRT- |
2. Government Accession No. | 3. Recipient's Catalog No. | ||||
| 4. Title and Subtitle Driver Visual Behavior in the Presence of Commercial Electronic Variable Message Signs (CEVMS) |
5. Report Date | |||||
| 6. Performing Organization Code | ||||||
| 7. Author(s) William A. Perez, Mary Anne Bertola, Jason F. Kennedy, and John A. Molino |
8. Performing Organization Report No. | |||||
| 9. Performing Organization Name and Address SAIC 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101 |
10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) | |||||
| 11. Contract or Grant No. | ||||||
| 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Real Estate Services Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered | |||||
| 14. Sponsoring Agency Code | ||||||
| 15. Supplementary Notes The Contracting Officer's Technical Representatives (COTR) were Christopher Monk and Thomas Granda. |
||||||
| 16. Abstract This study was conducted to investigate the effect of CEVMS on driver visual behavior in a roadway driving environment. An instrumented vehicle with an eye tracking system was used. Roads containing CEVMS, standard billboards, and control areas with no off-premise advertising were selected. Data were collected on arterials and freeways in the day and nighttime. Field studies were conducted in two cities where the same methodology was used but there were differences in the roadway visual environment. The gazes to the road ahead were high across the conditions; however, the CEVMS and billboard conditions resulted in a lower probability of gazes as compared to the control conditions (roadways not containing off-premise advertising) with the exception of arterials in Richmond where none of the conditions differed from each other. Examination of where drivers gazed in the CEVMS and standard billboard conditions showed that gazes away from the road ahead were not primarily to the billboards. Average and maximum fixations to CEVMS and standard billboards were similar across all conditions. However, four long dwell times were found (sequential and multiple fixations) that were greater than 2,000 ms. One was to a CEVMS on a freeway in the day time, two were to the same standard billboard on a freeway once in the day and once at night; and one was to a standard billboard on an arterial at night. In Richmond, the results showed that drivers gazed more at CEVMS than at standard billboards at night; however, in Reading the drivers were equally likely to gaze towards CEVMS or standard billboards in day and night. The results of the study are consistent with research and theory on the control of gaze behavior in natural environments. The demands of the driving task tend to affect the driver's self-regulation of gaze behavior. |
||||||
| 17. Key Words Driver visual behavior, visual environment, billboards, eye tracking system, commercial electronic variable message signs, CEVMS, visual complexity |
18. Distribution Statement No restrictions. |
|||||
| 19. Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified |
20. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified |
21. No. of Pages | 22. Price | |||