The target is being increased from 10% (2 year target) to 11% (4 year target). It should be pointed out that this new 4 year target is higher than the requirement of 23 CFR 490.411(a) which establishes a minimum condition level requirement of 10% for the NHS. If PRHTA sets a target at 11% and the actual % goes to 10.5%, this means that although the target would be met as it relates to 23 CFR 490.105, PRHTA would not be in compliance with 23 CFR 490.411(a). Based on this, PRHTA needs to
1. Clarify / indicate when the STIP would be re-analyzed to identify the new projects.
The STIP is expected to be revised by the first quarter of 2023. However, in order to be able to meet the 10%, we will need to have available the budgets described in TAMP NHS bridge scenarios 2 or 3. These scenarios are based on the Fiscal Plan approved by the Financial Management and Oversight Board in October 2022.
Note that the PRHTA had to make a compromise between the targets and meeting consistency. Although the FOMB approved a Fiscal Plan for the PRHTA on October 2022, there is no assurance on the particular date when the indicated funds will be available to the PRHTA or the exact amount that will be apportioned for NHS pavements and bridges. Therefore, PRHTA based its targets on the most conservative or worst-case scenario presented in the TAMP. This scenario includes the current STIP values from 2023 to 2026 and an average of the STIP values from 2027 to 2032. With that budget, an increase in the percentage of Poor NHS bridges is expected, as shown in the table below. Even though the selected target does not meet the 23 CFR 490.411(a) requirements, it will give PRHTA a good chance to meet the next annual consistency. The PRHTA understands that the penalty for not meeting consistency will represent a major negative impact compared to the penalty for not meeting the 10% minimum Federal target requirement for NHS bridges. In addition, the PRHTA would not to be over the 10% for three consecutive years in order to be penalized, and it is likely that the budget issue could be resolved within that period.
TAMP Scenario 1 HS Bridges -Resulting Projected Conditions Conditions 10-Year Target Base 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Good 15.0% 16.2% 16.4% 16.3% 16.5% 16.7% 16.7% 16.8% 16.8% 16.9% 16.9% 17.0% 17.0% Fair to Good 35.0% 36.7% 36.2% 35.8% 35.5% 34.9% 34.5% 34.2% 33.9% 33.6% 33.3% 33.0% 32.8% Fair to Poor 35.0% 39.3% 38.7% 38.4% 38.1% 38.0% 37.6% 37.6% 37.5% 37.4% 37.3% 37.2% 37.1% Poor 15.0% 7.8% 8.7% 9.5% 9.8% 10.4% 11.2% 11.5% 11.8% 12.2% 12.5% 12.8% 13.1% TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
2. Clarify / indicate if there are additional projects not included in the STIP that may help the condition projection (i.e. Metropistas bridge projects, etc.).
Yes, there are additional projects not included in the STIP. Metropistas projects are already included in all three TAMP scenarios. The Directory of Public Works will perform additional maintenance and preservation; however, the exact extent of the TAMP-related work and their corresponding investment was not available at the time of the TAMP development and is not currently documented.
3. Elaborate as to how the conditions indicated by PRHTA aligns with the PRHTA’s STIP Methodology Process included in the TAMP and the STIP and the response to question B8 of the Full performance period report.
A. The following echoes the information included in the TAMP Appendix K, which provides answers to FHWA comments. It relates to the process that was followed for the current STIP.
TAMP Support to STIP
Since 2020, the TAMP team has been collaborating with the PRHTA’s Project Management Information System (PMIS) effort. The first stage of the PMIS involved a process to create and manage project initiatives. A simple process was developed to identify potential initiatives that will be aligned to the TAMP strategies. The process is based on the current TAMP, the TAMP Excel tools, and the current STIP and other PRHTA project programs. Since then, we have been identifying sites for potential projects, with emphasis on National Highway System (NHS) pavements. The process applies also to bridges; however, currently, the PRHTA has been focused on addressing critical bridges. These project initiatives serve as a pool from which the STIP and other PRHTA programs can select projects that will help towards achieving the TAMP goals.
The general procedure to identify project initiatives can be summarized as follows 1. Use the TAMP investment strategies to identify the recommended treatment lane miles and bridge deck area per year and treatment type. 2. Identify the treatment gaps on the corresponding TAMP year. 3. Identify road segments and bridges with unfulfilled treatment needs compatible with the identified gaps. This is performed using the Condition, Inventory, and Base Treatment Excel TAMP tools. 4. Compare those road segments and bridges with the projects recently finished, in progress, or programmed. Select those that are not already executed, in execution, or programmed. These become the potential project initiatives to be further evaluated. 5. Use engineering judgement and data analyses to group pavement sections in segments needing similar treatments and with a total length adequate for construction. These will constitute the project initiatives. 6. Lists of initiatives are produced. a. The pavement lists include an identification code, road number, kilometer segment, pavement surface type, lane miles, road system, preliminary treatment type, and a preliminary cost estimate based on TAMP unit costs and measured segments requiring treatment. b. The bridge lists include an identification code, bridge number, deck area, road system, preliminary treatment type per bridge component (deck, superstructure, substructure), and a preliminary cost estimate based on TAMP unit costs and bridge deck area.
TAMP Considerations on STIP Project Selection Process
Pavement 1. The pavement project initiatives previously discussed in are gathered. Even though the initiatives identify a potential treatment type, they are not classified as such on the STIP to allow for refinements once further studies are performed during the design process. 2. In general, the PRHTA tends to include several improvement types in their projects. Therefore, pavement projects may also include other features such as highway safety devices, signage, acceleration or deceleration lane improvements, shoulder improvements, and minor bridge preservation. To account for such potential additional features and current inflation, a buffer is applied to the initiatives’ preliminary cost estimate. This is the construction cost that is included in the STIP. 3. Priority was given to segments in the NHS. First priority was given to the NHS-Interstate system to advance achieving the TAMP target of a maximum 5% lane miles in Poor condition and to get out of the current penalty as soon as possible. Second priority was given to the NHS Non-Interstate system. Non-NHS follows. 4. Another element considered in programming projects in the STIP is how ready is the project for obligation of FHWA funds. a. Projects in the final stage of design/permits are generally assigned to the closest year. b. Projects starting or in the early stages of design are generally assigned to the near to mid years. c. Projects in procurement process for design are generally assigned to the mid to later years. d. Projects in the early planning process are generally assigned to the latest year. 5. As the STIP needs to be fiscally constrained, projects are programmed based on funding availability and the previously mentioned priorities.
Bridges 1. Gather information from the 2028 TAMP, including targets, yearly bridge investment strategy, and unit costs. 2. Develop Bridge Program Yearly budgets based on guidance from PRHTA Programming Office, available funds information from PRHTA Federal Liaison Office, and FHWA Bridge Program Notice for Apportionment of Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Highway Infrastructure Program Funds for the Bridge Formula Program Pursuant to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. 3. Adjust the construction unit cost estimates from the TAMP to reflect observed increases in construction costs due to market fluctuations and the impacts of the pandemic and Hurricane Maria in the past years. 4. Bridge project selection aimed to reach TAMP targets for improvement in condition rating of bridges by incorporating Bridge rehabilitation and preservation projects in addition to Bridge Replacement projects. Project selection also considered on site conditions, complexity of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process compliance and Right of Way (ROW) considerations. 5. Priority was given to bridge projects with advanced design progress that were already included in previous STIP revisions. 6. Priority was also given to Critical Finding Bridges and all types of projects for bridges with Off-System classification to comply with Bridge Program Notice and Guidance for additional funding and allocation for Bridges beginning in FY22 through FY26. 7. Project readiness for FHWA funds obligation was also considered, advancing the projects in advanced design stages as follow a. First, projects in final stage of design/permits b. Second, projects starting or in early stages of Design c. Third, projects in procurement process for Design d. Fourth, all other projects
B. The following refers to the process that the PRHTA plans to implement to sustain the alignment of the STIP to the TAMP in the future. 1. Develop a series of presentations related to STIP development. The presentations will be made to all PRHTA, and contractor/consultants SMEs and decision makers involved in any aspect of the planning, programming, design and/or delivery of bridge and pavement projects. It will emphasize a. The Federal TAMP regulation and related penalties. b. The key aspects of the latest PRHTA TAMP. c. How to navigate the TAMP to find key information for planning projects. d. Point out the key information needed to evaluate potential projects against the TAMP. e. Keep track of all projects in the STIP that contribute to the TAMP investments for the annual consistency reports 2. Officially designate a Committee that will be in charge of putting together the STIP and appoint its leader. Assign roles and responsibilities to members. This Committee will also ensure that requirements from other plans such as the SHSP are also met. 3. Draft an SOP that will guide the Committee, including a schedule. 4. Monitor the implementation of the SOP and the delivery of the STIP projects. Take action to address any gaps or issues with project delivery that impact the investments shown in the TAMP. Escalate issues to the leadership for resolutions as appropriate.