Skip to ContentsU.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration FHWA HomeFeedback
   Bridge Technology
  
FHWA > Infrastructure > Bridge > Steel Fabrication > Automation Report

Computer Integrated Steel Bridge Design and Construction
Expanding Automation
Final Report

APPENDIX "C"
Pre-Workshop Survey
Summary of Responses

Summary of Responses Based on 15 responses

What is your primary area of interest/expertise:

Information Technology 1
Design 7
Fabrication (including Robotics & Welding) 6
Erection 1
Other
  • Fabrication Inspection
1

What is your secondary area of interest/expertise, if applicable:

Information Technology 1
Design 2
Fabrication (including Robotics & Welding) 4
Erection 3
Other
  • Servicing & Automation
  • Eng- Shop Detail Drawings
  • Administration
3

Identify the following:

High-Payoff (short term) Opportunities For Increased Automation Gaps, Needs & Potential Obstacles to Implementing These Opportunities
Electronic Submittal of Shop drawings a) ability to make designer comments during review on the electronic copy
b) ability to stamp and approve shop drawings & provide approved & current copies to required personnel
Standardize details to enhance automation a) getting all owners to agree upon common details
Electronic shop drawings:streamline drwg transfer, use for mat'l takeoffs/tracking Must agree on standard file format(pdf, TIFF), authentication & protection
Improve shop documentation and info flow in shop (weld proc. NDT, paint, bar codes) Educate users (ongoing process) and make available for smaller shops
Information transfer/storage/retrieval for shop owners, including exchange Standard file format & protocol, insuring medium won't be abandoned in future
Nondestructive testing and production monitoring for both QC and QA System cost, owner acceptance/trust in results, common stds, small shop access
Automated layout for cutting, NC cutting and drilling Initial cost for new equipment is high, requires retraining of employees
Electronic Submittal/Approval of Shop Drawings Liability & Security questions
Combining analysis, design & geometry software together Weak link is current software
Repeat elements - cleats, stairs, supports Design for repeat product
  IT knowledge and strategies

Data-detail

Data Tracking Low pay for Information
Web Management Technology People
Shop Layout Low Pay for Engineers

Poor or no Management Support

Faster Construction

Lower Costs

Communication between design software & fabricator software
Computer Based design and fabrication Fabrication considerations at design stage, particularly at structural details
  Code requirements should be improved
Autonomous Welding (less supervision by welders)

Automated inspections

Sensor Integration
Automation of Girder fit & weld CNC Is the Equipment available?
Detailing software for bridges  
Uniform Details Varying state practices
Medium and Longer term Opportunities for Automation Gaps, Needs & Potential Obstacles to Implementing These Opportunities
Using shop drawings for direct production control (mat'l select, cut, weld, paint) Develop various systems; "cost" of shop errors, correcting errors found in field
Flexibility to handle wide range of work (beams, I-grdrs, tubs, haunches, curves) System limits may exclude configurations and thwart innovative design concepts
Workers more productive and have broader responsibilities with automation Fewer workers, older empl resist tech trng (or unable), lose knowledge/manual skills
For repair & widening jobs, integrate new and existing shop drawings Major thrust in the next 50 yrs. Very labor-intensive unless "intelligent scanning"
Increased automation of all welding processes, automated fit-up and assembly (web to flange and stiffener assembly) Variability of girder size and many changes in flange size is an obstacle to automation
Use of electronic design info in fabrication Design software limitations. Enough interest in industry to see benefits
Automated contract drawing preparation Lack of software
Changed connection design Code acceptance
Designer acceptance
Appropriate equipment
Design rules
Columns and beams Product volumes
Modular buildings Designs
Failing Infrastructure Poor Scoping
  Lack of Timely use of resources
Bridge Programs  
Synergistic considerations from structural design to fabrication/erection procedures - CAD/CAM 1) CAD/FEA design connecting? Not consider manufacturing effects in eng. Welding/cutting

2) E.g. welding sequence effects that significantly improve fatigue performance ????

Yes, Welding robot System Engineering for integration of Welding System
Robotics for Welding Software and Hardware not able to handle submerged arc welding process
Robotics for welding Conn & total CNC program @ Eng. Or shop floor  
Fewer plate thickness variations which could lead to more uniform designs and details. Also this could lead to more advanced plate purchasing contracts which may speed up projects. Designers wanting to "optimize" all portions of girder

Other comments, suggestions and questions:

Appendix B | Table of Contents | Appendix D



FHWA Home | Infrastructure Home | Bridge Home | Feedback
FHWA