HERS requires estimates of highway improvement costs to be included in the analysis of investment options. In the case of the pavement, widening and alignment improvements currently considered by HERS, these costs are all initial costs; i.e., they are incurred at the time the improvement is implemented. When analyzing the economic attractiveness of a potential improvement, the improvement cost is used as the denominator in the benefit-cost equation.
This chapter contains six parts. The first discusses how HERS divides the section into the portion receiving improved alignment (if any) and the portion receiving the identified improvement.
The second part presents the HERS procedure for estimating the initial cost of each of the HERS-type improvements.
The third part explicates the HERS procedure for estimating the initial cost of improvements which include a modified alignment.
The fourth section presents the process for combining the costs with and without alignment modification to determine the total cost of improving a section.
The fifth part of this chapter discusses the allocation of improvement costs between preservation and expansion.
The final portion of this chapter presents the state cost factors which (optionally) adjust the cost of improvements by state.
On sections receiving an alignment improvement, HERS only improves alignment over that portion of the section with deficient alignment. HERS improves the rest of the section with the specified improvement. Thus HERS identifies three lengths for sections undergoing improvement:
HERS identifies the length of the section to be re-aligned (LNEW) as:
| LNEW = LAFTV × OPTV + LAFTH × OPTH |
where:
| LAFTV | = | length of corrected grades after re-alignment; |
|---|---|---|
| LAFTH | = | length of corrected curves after re-alignment; |
| OPTV | = | 1 if grades are being corrected by re-alignment, 0 otherwise; and |
| OPTH | = | 1 if curves are being corrected by re-alignment, 0 otherwise. |
The PreProcessor determines the two values LAFTV and LAFTH when processing the section's geometrics. HERS limits LNEW to be less than or equal to SLEN. The length of the section to be improved without re-alignment (IMPLEN) is:
| IMPLEN = SLEN ∠ LNEW |
HERS distinguishes nine elemental improvement costs, two of which are for improved alignment. Table 6-1, "Elemental Capital Improvement Costs," presents the scaled estimates of HERS improvement costs per lane-mile. These costs are national averages expressed in 2002 dollars but can be scaled to any other-year dollars by the user. The HERS costs include both improvement and right-of-way (ROW) costs, but do not include costs such as unusual cut and fill operations, excessive number of structures, or non-construction costs.
When adding lanes or re-aligning pavement, HERS distinguishes between costs incurred at "normal" and "high" cost. The cost level is determined by the interaction between each section's widening feasibility code (WDFEAS, HPMS item 62) and the section's functional class' widening feasibility override code. (For a more detailed discussion, see section 4.3, "The Widening Feasibility Model," page 4-26.) While under certain circumstances HERS will add both normal and high cost lanes in a single improvement, if any high cost lanes are added to a section HERS will perform any re-alignment on that section at high cost.
Three of the costs (for shoulders and the two add lanes costs) are incremental: that is, they are added to other improvements costs when costing the improvement.
HERS computes the cost of resurfacing a section as:
| RSCost = IMPLEN × XLANES × DHwyGrp |
where:
| RSCost | = | the cost of the resurfacing improvement; |
|---|---|---|
| IMPLEN | = | the length of the improvement; |
| XLANES | = | the number of existing lanes; and |
| DHwyGrp | = | the lane-mile cost to resurface, from column D of Table 6-1, with the row determined by the section's Highway Group. |
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reconstruct and Widen Lanes | Reconstruct Pavement | Resurface and Widen Lanes | Resurface Pavement | Improve Shoulders | Add Lane at Normal Cost | Add Lane at High Cost | Re-Align Pavement at Normal Cost | Re-Align Pavement at High Cost | |
| Rural Interstate | |||||||||
| Flat terrain | 1182 | 772 | 669 | 274 | 51 | 1899 | 2633 | 2106 | 10948 |
| Rolling terrain | 1325 | 792 | 770 | 292 | 84 | 2059 | 3331 | 2665 | 11444 |
| Mountainous terrain | 1564 | 916 | 927 | 322 | 129 | 2638 | 8315 | 3120 | 12458 |
| Rural Other Principal Arterials | |||||||||
| Flat terrain | 923 | 618 | 558 | 220 | 34 | 1521 | 2178 | 1742 | 8882 |
| Rolling terrain | 1042 | 635 | 634 | 245 | 57 | 1629 | 2629 | 2103 | 9396 |
| Mountainous terrain | 1197 | 720 | 739 | 267 | 89 | 1981 | 7368 | 12000 | 12000 |
| Rural Minor Arterials | |||||||||
| Flat terrain | 844 | 543 | 520 | 195 | 32 | 1383 | 1941 | 1553 | 1553 |
| Rolling terrain | 1019 | 601 | 647 | 210 | 59 | 1585 | 2500 | 2000 | 2000 |
| Mountainous terrain | 1182 | 687 | 761 | 232 | 90 | 1951 | 7368 | 11500 | 11500 |
| Rural Major Collectors | |||||||||
| Flat terrain | 889 | 575 | 537 | 199 | 41 | 1436 | 1436 | 1553 | 8838 |
| Rolling terrain | 973 | 584 | 604 | 211 | 55 | 1468 | 1468 | 1910 | 10054 |
| Mountainous terrain | 1111 | 662 | 699 | 231 | 87 | 1730 | 6911 | 11000 | 11000 |
| Urban Interstate, Other Freeways and Expressways | |||||||||
| Small Urban | 1987 | 1376 | 1566 | 334 | 61 | 3116 | 11094 | 5235 | 13290 |
| Small Urbanized | 2136 | 1388 | 1620 | 395 | 81 | 3405 | 12121 | 5720 | 14939 |
| Large Urbanized | 3407 | 2272 | 2509 | 530 | 306 | 5699 | 60000 | 9574 | 60000 |
| Urban Other Principal Arterials | |||||||||
| Small Urban | 1732 | 1169 | 1433 | 280 | 62 | 2649 | 9430 | 4450 | 11131 |
| Small Urbanized | 1853 | 1183 | 1498 | 331 | 83 | 2870 | 10218 | 4822 | 12401 |
| Large Urbanized | 2647 | 1734 | 2192 | 416 | 267 | 4200 | 14953 | 6216 | 14288 |
| Urban Minor Arterials and Collectors | |||||||||
| Small Urban | 1276 | 883 | 1084 | 205 | 45 | 1956 | 6964 | 3287 | 8929 |
| Small Urbanized | 1337 | 893 | 1094 | 233 | 55 | 2061 | 7338 | 3463 | 10003 |
| Large Urbanized | 1800 | 1194 | 1496 | 286 | 150 | 2858 | 10173 | 4801 | 11179 |
HERS computes the cost of resurfacing a section and improving shoulders as:
| RSSHCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × DHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × EHwyGrp × FT |
where:
| RSSHCost | = | the cost of the resurfacing with improved shoulders improvement; |
|---|---|---|
| IMPLEN | = | the length of the improvement; |
| XLANES | = | the number of existing lanes; |
| EHwyGrp | = | the center-line mile cost to improve the shoulder on one side of the highway, from column E of Table 6-1, with the row determined by the section's Highway Group; and |
| FT | = | 1 for one-way facility, 2 for two-way facility. |
As this improvement can be implemented with or without shoulder improvements, HERS uses either of these two algorithms to calculate the cost. When shoulders are not being improved:
| RSWLCost = IMPLEN × XLANES × CHwyGrp |
where:
| RSWLCost | = | the cost of resurfacing an widening lanes; and |
|---|---|---|
| CHwyGrp | = | the lane-mile cost to resurface with wider lanes, from column C of Table 6-1, with the row determined by the section's Highway Group. |
When shoulders are also being improved, HERS uses:
| RSWLCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × CHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × EHwyGrp × FT |
where all terms are as defined above.
HERS uses one of four possible algorithms when costing this improvement depending upon whether lane width and shoulders (or both) are being included in the improvement. The simplest algorithm is when neither lane width or shoulders are being improved:
| RSNCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × DHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp |
where:
| RSNCCost | = | the cost of resurfacing and adding normal cost lanes; |
|---|---|---|
| NCLADD | = | the number of normal cost lanes being added; and |
| FHwyGrp | = | the lane-mile cost to add a lane at normal cost, from column F of Table 6-1, with the row determined by the section's Highway Group. |
When the shoulders are to be improved, HERS uses:
| RSNCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × DHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × EHwyGrp × FT |
When the existing lanes are to be widened (but shoulders not improved) HERS uses:
| RSNCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × CHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp |
thus substituting the base cost of resurfacing with wider lanes for simple resurfacing.
And when the section is to be resurfaced with wider lanes and shoulder improvements, and additional lanes added at normal cost, HERS uses:
| RSNCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × CHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × EHwyGrp × FT |
using the base cost of resurfacing with wider lanes plus the cost of adding lanes plus the cost of shoulder improvements.
The HERS algorithms for adding high cost lanes are the same as those for normal cost lanes with the addition of high cost lanes as an additional charge. This accommodates improvements which add lanes at both normal and high cost. If no normal cost lanes are added, then NCLADD is zero.
For simple resurfacing and adding lanes, some at high cost, HERS calculates:
| RSHCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × DHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × HCLADD × GHwyGrp |
where:
| RSHCCost | = | the cost of resurfacing and adding high cost lanes; and |
|---|---|---|
| GHwyGrp | = | the lane-mile cost to add a lane at high cost, from column G of Table 6-1, with the row determined by the section's Highway Group. |
When shoulders are to be improved, HERS uses:
| RSHCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × DHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × HCLADD × GHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × EHwyGrp × FT |
When the existing lanes are to be widened without shoulder improvements, HERS calculates:
| RSHCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × CHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × HCLADD × GHwyGrp |
And when existing lanes are widened, shoulders are improved, and lanes added at high cost, HERS uses:
| RSHCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × CHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × HCLADD × GHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × EHwyGrp × FT |
HERS determines the cost of reconstructing existing pavements as:
| RCCost = IMPLEN × XLANES × BHwyGrp |
where:
| RCCost | = | the cost of reconstructing pavement; and |
|---|---|---|
| BHwyGrp | = | the lane-mile cost to reconstruct pavement, from column B of Table 6-1, with the row determined by the section's Highway Group. |
When HERS reconstructs pavements, it improves the shoulders to the design standard if necessary. HERS does not identify or cost "reconstruction with shoulder improvements" as a separate improvement type.
HERS calculates the cost of reconstructing pavement and widening the existing lanes as:
| RCWLCost = IMPLEN × XLANES × AHwyGrp |
where:
| RCWLCost | = | the cost of reconstructing pavement and widening the existing lanes; and |
|---|---|---|
| AHwyGrp | = | the lane-mile cost to reconstruct pavement with wider lanes, from column A of Table 6-1, with the row determined by the section's Highway Group. |
When reconstructing pavement and adding lanes at normal cost, HERS uses:
| RCNCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × BHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp |
where:
| RCNCCost | = | the cost of reconstructing pavement and adding lanes at normal cost. |
|---|
When the existing lanes are to be reconstructed and widened, and new lanes are to be added at normal cost, HERS calculates:
| RCNCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × AHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp |
HERS costs pavement reconstruction and the addition of lanes at high (and possibly normal) cost as:
| RCHCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × BHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × HCLADD × GHwyGrp |
where:
| RCHCCost | = | the cost of reconstructing pavement and adding lanes at high cost. |
|---|
When the existing lanes are to widened as well as being reconstructed, HERS uses:
| RCHCCost = | IMPLEN × XLANES × AHwyGrp + |
| IMPLEN × NCLADD × FHwyGrp + | |
| IMPLEN × HCLADD × GHwyGrp |
HERS performs re-alignment only on that portion of a section which is reported as deficient in alignment.
As with improvements which add lanes, HERS performs alignment improvements at either normal or high cost dependent upon each section's widening feasibility code (WDFEAS) and the widening feasibility code override (WDFOVR) for the section's functional class. (See section 4.3, "The Widening Feasibility Model," page 4-26, for details on the widening feasibility mechanism.) Re-alignment is calculated at high cost when a section's WFEAS is one (meaning no widening is possible) or lanes are being added and some of those lanes are at high cost. Otherwise, re-alignment is calculated at normal cost.
To calculate alignment costs on a section, HERS uses:
| ALIGNCost = LNEW × ALLLANES × HIHwyGrp |
where:
| ALIGNCost | = | the cost of alignment improvement on the section; |
|---|---|---|
| LNEW | = | the length of the section undergoing alignment improvement; |
| ALLLANES | = | the total number of lanes on the section after improvement (that is, the sum of the existing lanes and any lanes being added); and |
| HIHwyGrp | = | the lane-mile cost to re-align pavement, from columns H (normal cost) or I (high cost) of Table 6-1, with the row determined by the section's Highway Group. |
For any section, HERS obtains the total initial improvement cost for combining pavement and widening improvements with alignment improvements by combining the cost of reconstructing part of the section on a modified alignment with the cost of the pavement and widening improvements made to the remainder of the section:
| TOTIMPCost = (IMPCost + ALIGNCost) × EXPFAC |
where:
| TOTIMPCost | = | the total expanded cost of the improvement; |
|---|---|---|
| IMPCost | = | the cost of improving the portion of the section which did not undergo re-alignment (as calculated using equations 6.3 through 6.20); |
| ALIGNCost | = | the cost of improving the portion of the section which was re-aligned (using equation 6.21); and |
| EXPFAC | = | the section's expansion factor. |
During the process of calculating the cost of an improvement HERS allocates the cost between the preservation of existing pavement and the expansion of capacity. HERS allocates the costs as follows (where the columns are those of Table 6-1):
HERS indexes improvement costs by state. The cost factors are derived from Price Trends1 as a three-year rolling average, and are applied to all capital costs associated with the improvement. For the 2004 C&P Report, all the state cost factors were set to 1.0. Table 6-2 presents the index values used for the 2002 C&P Report (which used 2000 data).
1. Office of Infrastructure, op. cit.
| State | Factor |
|---|---|
| a. Source: Derived from FHWA, "Price Trends for Federal-Aid Highway Construction," quarterly. | |
| AL | 0.936 |
| AK | 1.831 |
| AZ | 0.855 |
| AR | 0.640 |
| CA | 1.262 |
| CO | 1.060 |
| CT | 1.009 |
| DE | 1.349 |
| DC | 1.018 |
| FL | 1.020 |
| GA | 1.091 |
| HI | 1.146 |
| ID | 0.733 |
| IL | 1.159 |
| IN | 0.740 |
| IA | 0.745 |
| KS | 0.765 |
| KY | 1.888 |
| LA | 1.016 |
| ME | 1.541 |
| MD | 1.274 |
| MA | 1.805 |
| MI | 1.324 |
| MN | 1.222 |
| MS | 1.211 |
| MO | 0.846 |
| MT | 1.052 |
| NE | 0.927 |
| NV | 1.019 |
| NH | 0.556 |
| NJ | 0.771 |
| NM | 0.983 |
| NY | 1.318 |
| NC | 0.911 |
| ND | 0.782 |
| OH | 1.152 |
| OK | 1.054 |
| OR | 1.329 |
| PA | 1.295 |
| RI | 0.840 |
| SC | 1.416 |
| SD | 0.857 |
| TN | 0.929 |
| TX | 0.687 |
| UT | 0.957 |
| VT | 1.232 |
| VA | 1.081 |
| WA | 1.139 |
| WV | 1.196 |
| WI | 0.974 |
| WY | 0.990 |
| PR | 0.725 |