Asset Management

Pavement Management Systems Peer Exchange Program Report

• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• INTRODUCTION
  • Objective
  • Peer Exchange Approach
  • Participating Agencies
    • Minnesota DOT
    • Utah DOT
    • Other Participating Agencies
  • Peer Exchange Focus Areas
  • Special Interests of Participating Agencies
  • Using the Report as a Guide to a Successful and Fully Utilized Pavement Management Program
• FINDINGS AND OBSERVATIONS
  • Data Collection Activities
    • Mn/DOT
    • UDOT
  • Links to Maintenance and Operations
  • Links to Planning and Programming Activities
    • Mn/DOT
    • UDOT
  • Influence of Pavement Management on Project and Treatment Selection
    • Mn/DOT
    • UDOT
  • Use of Pavement Management For Non-Traditional Applications
    • Engineering and Economic Analysis
    • Links to Asset Management
    • Availability of Data to Support Other Needs
  • Support of Upper Management
  • Staffing and Other Resources
  • Future Activities/Directions
  • Software Selection and Procurement
    • Lessons Learned
  • Institutional or Implementation Issues
  • Key Success Factors
  • Benefits Realized
• CONCLUSIONS
  • Next Steps
    • FHWA
    • Participating Agencies
• REFERENCES
• APPENDIX A - PEER EXCHANGE AGENDA
• LIST OF FIGURES
  • Figure 1. Example of the link between level of maintenance provided and budget needs.
  • Figure 2. Mn/DOT's planning and programming process.
  • Figure 3. Example of a site-specific performance curve.
  • Figure 4. UDOT's decision process for selecting the preferred seal.
• LIST OF TABLES
  • Table 1. Participants in the Peer Exchange Program
  • Table 2. Mn/DOT pavement condition data collection procedures.
  • Table 3. Mn/DOT RQI targets for 2014.
  • Table 4. UDOT pavement distress data.
  • Table 5. List of treatments considered in Mn/DOT's pavement management software.
  • Table 6. List of treatments considered in UDOT's pavement management software.

May 8, 2008