| FHWA > Engineering > Pavements > Concrete > High Performance Concrete Pavements: Project Summary > Chapter 10 |
High Performance Concrete Pavements
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mixing Time (seconds) | CARLISLE TEST SITE (STANDARD DRUM MIXER) | CARROLL TEST SITE (MODIFIED DRUM MIXER) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa DOT Mix | Contractor Mix | Iowa DOT Mix | Contractor Mix | |
| 30 | X | |||
| 45 | X | X | X | |
| 60 | X | X | ||
| 90 | X | X | ||
To achieve the objectives of this project, the Iowa DOT and the Iowa State University jointly participated in the testing and monitoring of the concrete mixing and paving activities. The paving was performed in the summer of 1996.
The testing methods in ASTM C 94 were used in this study to determine the significance of the mixing time on the consistency of the concrete mix delivered and placed on grade (Cable and McDaniel 1998a). ASTM C 94 is designed to check the consistency of the material at the beginning and near the end of the truck discharge. Using this standard, measurements of slump, unit weight, air content, retained coarse aggregate, and compressive strength were obtained and used to compare the consistency of the mix at different points of delivery (Cable and McDaniel 1998a).
At both the Carlisle and Carroll sites, the tests listed in Table 15 were conducted for each combination of mixing time and mix design included in the investigation. For the slump, unit weight, plastic air content, and wash tests, samples were obtained from three different locations for the same load of material: the center of the haul truck, the side of the haul truck, and on grade in front of the paver (Cable and McDaniel 1998a). Compressive testing of cylinders and cores was performed on concrete retrieved from the same batch as for the slump, unit weight, air content, and wash tests (Cable and McDaniel 1998a). Air void distribution testing was conducted on hardened concrete cores also taken from the same batch (Cable and McDaniel 1998a).
The haul trucks to be tested were selected at random at approximately ½- to 1-hour increments (Cable and McDaniel 1998a). Trucks were selected for testing only when the paver and plant were in continuous operation to ensure representative samples. Sufficient concrete was obtained from each truck to provide for tests of slump, unit weight, air content, and for the preparation of cylinders for compressive testing (Cable and McDaniel 1998a). Upon completion of the unit weight test, the material in the unit weight bucket was washed through a sieve to remove all fines and cement, and then the retained coarse aggregate was weighed and compared to the unit weight and the expected weight of coarse aggregate in the unit weight bucket (Cable and McDaniel 1998a).
| TEST | TEST METHODOLOGY | TESTING LOCATIONS/SPECIMENS |
|---|---|---|
| Slump | Conducted in accordance with ASTM C143 | Center of truck Side of truck On grade in front of paver |
| PCC unit weight | Conducted in accordance with ASTM C138 | Center of truck Side of truck On grade in front of paver |
| Air content (plastic concrete) | Conducted in accordance with ASTM C231 | Center of truck Side of truck On grade in front of paver |
| Wash test | Conducted in accordance with ASTM C94 | Center of truck Side of truck On grade in front of paver |
| Compressive strength (cylinders) | Conducted in accordance with ASTM C42 | Cylinders cast from each specific batch |
| Compressive strength (cores) | Conducted in accordance with ASTM C42 | Cores obtained from known batch locations |
| Air void distribution (cores) | Measured using low-vacuum electron microscope and computer imaging analysis | Cores obtained behind the paver |
The approximate location of a sampled batch of concrete in the pavement was recorded during the paving operation for later coring operations (Cable and McDaniel 1998a). Core sampling was conducted at the noted locations after the concrete had reached a strength of 3.4 MPa (500 lbf/in2).
The instruments used for the air void analysis of hardened concrete cores were a Hitachi 2460 N low-vacuum scanning electron microscope, a Tetra back-scattered electron detector, Deben stage automation, and an Oxford Instrument ISIS x-ray analysis system (Cable and McDaniel 1998a). Samples were prepared from the cores, and special software was used to determine the area and size of the air voids in each image (Cable and McDaniel 1998a).
No further monitoring or reporting is anticipated. This project has now been completed.
Extensive statistical analyses were conducted on the data collected from each test site. Comparisons of key concrete properties (slump, unit weight, air content, and compressive strength) were made between testing location (side, center, or on grade) and between the various mixing times (30, 45, 60, and 90 seconds). Based on these analyses, the following general conclusions were drawn (Cable 1998; Cable and McDaniel 1998a):
Jim Cable
Iowa State University
Department of Civil and
Construction Engineering
378 Town Engineering Building
Ames, IA 50011
(515) 294-2862
Mark Dunn
Iowa Department of Transportation
800 Lincoln Way
Ames, IA 50011
(515) 239-1111
Cable, J. K. 1998. "Evaluation of Mix Time on Concrete Consistency and Consolidation." Proceedings, Crossroads 2000 Conference, Ames, IA.
Cable, J. K., and L. L. McDaniel. 1998a. Effect of Mix Times on PCC Properties. Iowa DOT Project HR-1066. Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames.
| << Previous | Contents | Next >> |
Sam Tyson
Office of Asset Management, Pavement, and Construction
202-366-1326
E-mail Sam