|Research Home | Hydraulics Home|
|This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information|
Publication Number: FHWA-RD-03-052
Date: May 2005
Field Observations and Evaluations of Streambed Scour At Bridges
CHAPTER 3: DESCRIPTION OF FIELD METHODS
The type of data collected at a bridge is determined by the scour processes being studied and the equipment's capability to collect the desired data. The type of scour being studied (pier, abutment, or contraction) determines which variables need to be measured and the spatial distribution of these data. For local pier scour, measurement of the approach velocity, bed material properties, and cross-sectional data to define the reference surface and maximum depth of scour may be sufficient. For abutment and contraction scour, hydraulic conditions in the approach section are important. Unfortunately, the site configuration may limit the data that can be collected accurately and safely. Floodplains commonly are covered by trees and other woody vegetation, which makes measurement of the velocity and flow distribution virtually impossible. Debris and ice accumulations may prevent measuring streambed elevations in key areas. On small streams, the duration of the flood may not allow sufficient time to collect all of the desired data; all desired data are rarely collected at a site.
The USGS has defined two classes of field data: limited-detailed and detailed.(21) In general, limited-detailed data can be collected from the bridge deck, and the spatial extent of the data is restricted to the upstream and downstream edges of the bridge. Detailed data require the deployment of equipment from a boat to collect data over an area extending beyond the hydraulic effect of the bridge. Most available data are from limited-detail data collection efforts sponsored by State highway departments. The FHWA-sponsored national bridge scour studies are responsible for most of the detailed data sets that have been collected.
A brief summary of these types of data is presented here. For a more detailed discussion of limited-detail data collection see Landers and Mueller,(21) Jarrett and Boyle,(35) and Mueller and Landers.(36) A comprehensive presentation of detailed data collection and the necessary equipment can be found in Landers and Mueller,(21) Mueller and Landers,(36) and Mueller.(5)
Limited-detail data primarily are collected to evaluate published equations, investigate the relations between local scour and explanatory variables, and develop envelope curves for the maximum observed scour. Limited-detail data sets should include the following data:(21)
Rantz et al.(37) and Landers and Mueller(21) describe equipment and procedures for discharge and approach velocity measurements. Bed material samples can be collected using the equipment and procedures described in Landers and Mueller, Mueller and Landers, Edwards and Glysson, Ashmore et al., Yuzyk, and the International Organization for Standardization (1992). (See references 21, 36, 38, 39, 40, and 41.)
Detailed data sets are similar to limited-detail data except the data are denser and their spatial extent broader. Ideally, detailed data sets include real-time measurements of hydraulic and channel-geometry data at several times during the flood hydrograph. Data are collected both upstream and downstream in an area that extends just beyond the hydraulic effect of the bridge. The extent of the hydraulic effect of the bridge both upstream and downstream depends on the degree of contraction, the size and configuration of the floodplains and approach embankments, and the slope of the stream. The goal is to collect data at least 10 bridge widths upstream and downstream, but this may be adjusted in the field as site conditions dictate. Detailed data sets allow distinction between local, contraction, and general scour occurring at the highway crossing, and are needed to advance the understanding of complex bridge scour processes. Detailed data sets should include the following:
The procedures and equipment for making discharge measurements and collecting suspended-load and bed material samples are the same as those used for the limited-detail measurements. The spatial extent of the bathymetric and velocity data is much greater for detailed data sets than for limited-detail data sets; therefore, instruments must be deployed from the water surface rather than from the bridge deck. It is also highly desirable to measure the direction of flow in addition to the velocity magnitude.
Topics: research, infrastructure, hydraulics
Keywords: research, infrastructure, hydraulics, Bridge scour, field data, contraction scour, abutment scour, pier scour, local scour, debri
TRT Terms: Scour at bridges--United States--Mathematical models, Bridges--United States--Foundations and piers, Streambeds, Bridge abutments, Bridge piers, Contraction