|Research Home | Pavements Home|
|This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information|
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-13-050
Date: November 2013
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®
Many important decisions are necessary in order to successfully provide and manage a pavement network. At the heart of this process is the prediction of needed future construction events. One approach to providing a single numeric on the condition of a pavement network is the use of pavement remaining service life (RSL). However, many issues exist with the current RSL terminology and resulting numeric that complicate proper interpretation, interagency data exchange, and use. A major source of uncertainty in the current RSL definition is the use of the term “life” to represent multiple points in the pavement construction history. The recommended path to consistency involves adopting terminology of time remaining until a defined construction treatment is required (i.e., RSL is replaced by remaining service interval (RSI)). The term “RSI” has the ability to unify the outcome of different approaches to determine needs by focusing on when and what treatments are needed and the service interruption created. This report provides guidelines for implementing the RSI concept as a replacement to the current remaining life terminology for pavements. The RSI concept is broken down into a series of steps that follow a logical progression. Examples of the concept are presented using pavement engineering methodologies in current use. Suggestions are also provided based on the results of the RSI process. While this report focuses on pavements, it is also applicable to other types of transportation infrastructure. A companion report presents the framework for replacing the current RSL terminology with one based on more exact construction event terms.(1) This report is intended for use by pavement managers and pavement investment decisionmakers across the United States.
Jorge E. Pagán-Ortiz
Director, Office of Infrastructure
Research and Development
This document is distributed under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document.
Quality Assurance Statement
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of the information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvements.
Topics: research, infrastructure, pavements and materials
Keywords: research, infrastructure, pavements and materials, Pavement remaining service life, Pavement remaining life, Pavement remaining service interval, Pavement construction events, Pavement construction triggers, Pavement threshold limits, Pavement performance expectancy curves, Pavement data collection, Pavement strategy selection, Repairable system
TRT Terms: research, facilities, transportation, highway facilities, roads, parts of roads, pavements