U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-15-071    Date:  January 2016
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-15-071
Date: January 2016

 

The Use of Data in Planning for Operations: State-Of-The-Practice Review

References

  1. Federal Highway Administration (2015). “Planning for Operations Homepage.” (Web site) Washington, DC. Accessed online: December 3, 2015. (http://www.plan4operations.dot.gov/)

  2. Mahassani, H.S., Kim, J., Chen, Y., Stogios, Y., Brijmohan, A., and Vovsha, P. (2014). SHRP2 L04: Incorporating Reliability Performance Measures in Operations and Planning Modeling Tools, SHRP 2 Report S2-L04-RR-1, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. (http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/170716.aspx)

  3. Vandervalk, A., Louch, H., Guerre, J., and Margiotta, R. (2014). Incorporating Reliability Performance Measures into the Transportation Planning and Programming Processes – Technical Reference, SHRP 2 Report S2-L05-RR-3, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. (http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/168856.aspx)

  4. Federal Highway Administration (publication date unknown). “The Urban Congestion Report (UCR): Documentation and Definitions” (Web site) Washington, DC. Accessed online: December 3, 2015. (http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/perf_measurement/ucr/documentation.htm.)

  5. Tarnoff, P.J., Young, S. E., Crunkleton, J., and Nezamuddin N. (2008). Guide to Benchmarking Operations Performance Measures, Preliminary Draft Final Report for the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. (http://www.catt.umd.edu/research/benchmarking)

  6. Margiotta, R., Dowling, R., and Paracha, J. (2012). Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation for Traffic Incident Management Applications, Report No. FHWA-HOP-12-045, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. (http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop12045/index.htm)

  7. Nevers, B. L., Nguyen, K. M., Quayle, S. M., Zhou, X. and Taylor, J. (2013). The Effective Integration of Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation Tools, Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-036, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA. (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/13036/index.cfm)

  8. Jeannotte, K., Sallman, D., Margiotta, R. and Howard, M. (009). Applying Analysis Tools in Planning for Operations, Report no. FHWA-HOP-10-001, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. (http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop10001/index.htm)

  9. Sallman, D., Flanigan, E., Jeannotte, K., Hedden, C., and Morallos, D. (2012). Operations Benefit/Cost Analysis Desk Reference, Report No. FHWA-HOP-12-028, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. (http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop12028/index.htm)

  10. Alexiadis, V. and Sallman, D. (2012). Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume XIII: Integrated Corridor Management Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation Guide, Report No. FHWA-JPO-12-074, U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Washington, DC. (http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/50000/50600/50615/30B00211.pdf)

  11. Mahmassani, H., Mudge, R., Hou, T., and Kim, J. (2013). Use of Mobile Data for Weather Responsive Traffic Management Models, Report No. FHWA-JPO-13-003, United States Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. (http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/47000/47300/47329/FHWA-JPO-13-003-Final_Pkg_V1.pdf)

  12. Scriba, T., Chandler, B., Kehoe, N., Beasley, K., O’ Donnell, C., Luttrell, T., and Perry, E. (2012). Assessing the Effectiveness of Transportation Management Plan (TMP) Strategies: Feasibility, Usefulness, and Possible Approaches, Report No. FHWA-HOP-12-043, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. (ttp://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/resources/publications/fhwahop12043/fhwahop12043.pdf)

  13. U.S. DOT, RITA, Integrated Corridor Management Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation Results for the U.S. 75 Corridor in Dallas, Texas, September 2010, unpublished.

  14. USDOT, Research and Innovative Technology Administration (2010). “Integrated Corridor Management,” United States Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Workshop Presentation.

  15. Alexiadis, V. and Armstrong, A. (2010). Integrated Corridor Management Modeling Results Report: Dallas, Minneapolis, and San Diego, Report No. FHWA-JPO-12_037, USDOT, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Washington, DC. (http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/54000/54300/54346/ICM_Modeling_Results_Report__FHWA-JPO-12-037_.pdf)

  16. USDOT, Annex 3. ICM AMS Results for the I-15 Corridor in San Diego, California, September 2010, unpublished.

  17. Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (2009). 2013-2035 Regional Transportation Plan, Appendix 6: Congestion Management and Project Selection Process, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, NV. Accessed online: December 3, 2015. (www.rtcsnv.com/planning-engineering/transportation-planning/2013-2035-regional-transportation-plan-update)

  18. Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (2015). “FAST Dashboard” (Web site), Las Vegas, NV. Accessed online: December 3, 2015. http://bugatti.nvfast.org/Default.aspx.

  19. ICF Consulting (2006). Congestion Management Process Innovations: A Menu of Options, New York State Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations, New York, NY. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.incog.org/Transportation/congestionandtraffic/CMS_FINAL_REPORT.pdf)

  20. Muthukumar, V. and Dangeti, M. (2011). Before and After Studies for RTC Transit, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, NV. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.rtcsnv.com/mpo/plansstudies/Docs/UPWP_report_4.0.pdf)

  21. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (2011). Before and After Studies for RTC Transit –Boulder Highway Before Study, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, NV. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.rtcsnv.com/mpo/plansstudies/Docs/2011-06-30%20BEFORE%20REPORT%20-%20Boulder%20Highway%20v7(No%20UNLV%20Data).pdf)

  22. Houston-Galveston Area Council (2014). “Houston-Galveston Area Council Homepage” (Web site), Houston, TX. Accessed online: December 3, 2015. (http://www.h-gac.com/home/default.aspx)

  23. Houston TranStar (2015). “Real-Time Traffic Map” (Web site), Houston, TX. Accessed online: December 3, 2015. (http://traffic.houstontranstar.org/layers/)

  24. Metropolitan Planning Commission (2014). “State of the System: Measuring Bay Area Transportation Performance” (Web site), Oakland, CA. Accessed online: December 3, 2015. (http://www.mtc.ca.gov/library/state_of_the_system/)

  25. California Department of Transportation (2014). “Performance Measurement System (PeMS)” (Web site), CA. Accessed online: December 3, 2015. (http://pems.dot.ca.gov/)

  26. Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission (2015). “511 System” (Web site). Accessed on December 3, 2015. (http://www.511.org)

  27. Association of Bay Area Governments and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (2013). Plan Bay Area, Oakland, CA. Accessed on December 3, 2015. (http://www.mtc.ca.gov/planning/plan_bay_area/)

  28. Association of Bay Area Governments and Metropolitan Transportation Commission (2013). Plan Bay Area - Strategy for a Sustainable Region - Final Performance Assessment Report, Oakland, CA. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://planbayarea.org/pdf/final_supplemental_reports/FINAL_PBA_Performance_Assessment_Report.pdf)

  29. Cambridge Systematics and System Metrics Group (2008). San Mateo/Santa Clara 101 Corridor – Existing Conditions Analysis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, CA.

  30. Caltrans District 4 (2010). Interstate 580 East - Corridor System Management System, Oakland, CA. Accessed online: December 4, 2015. (http://dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/corridor-mobility/CSMPs/d4_CSMPs/i580/580E_CSMP_Summary.pdf)

  31. Caltrans, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and California Highway Patrol, Traffic Operations System Equipment Management System (TEMS). Accessed TEMS 2012.

  32. Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (2014). “Data Services Home” (Web site), Pittsburg, PA. Accessed online: December 4, 2015. (http://www.spcregion.org/data_store.shtml#traffic)

  33. Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (2011). 2040 Transportation and Development Plan for Southwestern Pennsylvania, Section 4. The Transportation Plan, Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission, Pittsburg, PA. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.spcregion.org/pdf/lrp2040/2040%20Plan_4_Transportation%20Plan.pdf)

  34. Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (2011). 2011 Regional Operations Plan, Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission, Pittsburg, PA. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.spcregion.org/pdf/rop11/2011_ROP_FINAL_070611.pdf)

  35. Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (2015). Congestion Management Corridors: Allegheny County: Corridor 125: 5th Ave/Forbes Ave, Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission, Pittsburg, PA. Accessed December 7, 2015. (http://www.spcregion.org/trans_cong_corr125.shtml)

  36. San Diego Association of Governments (2004). Regional Comprehensive Plan for the San Diego Region, San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.sandag.org/?projectid=1&fuseaction=projects.detail)

  37. San Diego Association of Governments (2015). “Transportation” (Web site) San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA. Accessed online: December 4, 2015. (http://www.sandag.org/index.asp?subclassid=78&fuseaction=home.subclasshome)

  38. San Diego Association of Governments (2013). “I-15 Integrated Corridor Management” (Web site), San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA. Accessed online: December 4, 2015. (http://www.sandag.org/index.asp?projectid=429&fuseaction=projects.detail)

  39. San Diego Association of Governments (2013). State of the Commute 2013, San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA. Later reports available at: http://www.sandag.org/index.asp?projectid=257&fuseaction=projects.detail.

  40. San Diego Association of Governments (2012). “TransNet Active Transportation Grant Program: Cycle 2” (Web site), San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA. Accessed online: December 4, 2015. (http://www.sandag.org/index.asp?classid=13&subclassid=98&projectid=
    418&fuseaction=projects.detail)

  41. San Diego Association of Governments (2014). Riding to 2050, The San Diego Regional Bicycle Plan, San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.sandag.org/index.asp?projectid=353&fuseaction=projects.detail)

  42. System Metrics Group, Inc. (2010). Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) San Diego County I-805, Final Report, San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego, CA. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist11/departments/planning/pdfs/corridor/2010_CSMP_Final_Report.pdf)

  43. Metro (2014). 2014 Regional Transportation Plan, Metro, Portland, OR. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.oregonmetro.gov/regional-transportation-plan)

  44. Metro (2010). 2035 Regional Transportation Plan, Metro, Portland, OR. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.oregonmetro.gov/regional-transportation-plan)

  45. Metro (2010). “Mobility Corridor Atlas” (Web site), Metro, Portland, OR. Accessed on December 4, 2015. (http://www.oregonmetro.gov/mobility-corridors-atlas)

  46. Metro (2014). 2015 – 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program, Metro, Portland, OR. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.oregonmetro.gov/metropolitan-transportation-improvement-program)

  47. Metro (2010). Regional Transportation System Management and Operations Plan, Metro, Portland, OR. Accessed online: December 7, 2015. (http://www.oregonmetro.gov/regional-transportation-system-management-and-operations-plan)

  48. Wilmington Area Planning Council (2012). 2012 Congestion Management System Summary, Wilmington Area Planning Council, Wilmington, DE. Accessed online: December 4, 2015. (http://www.wilmapco.org/RTP2040/appendix/AppendixK.pdf)

  49. Wilmington Area Planning Council (2015). “Congestion Management System website” (Web site), Wilmington Area Planning Council, Wilmington, DE. Accessed online: December 4, 2015. (http://www.wilmapco.org/cms/)

  50. Pima Association of Governments (2015). “2012 Traffic Volumes in Metropolitan Tucson and Eastern Pima County” (Web site), Pima Association of Governments, Pima, AZ. Accessed online: December 4, 2015. (https://www.pagnet.org/RegionalData/TravelDataandForecasting/AnnualTrafficCountProgram/tabid/108/Default.aspx)

 

 

Return to top

Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | Web Policies & Notices | No Fear Act | Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse | U.S. DOT Home | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101