Formulas, Takedowns, and Setasides - Surface Transportation Program

Formulas, Takedowns, and Setasides
Current Law	Administration Proposal H.R. 2088 & S. 1072 as Modified SAFETEA of 2003	House H.R. 3 as Passed House TEA-LU	Senate H.R. 3 as Passed Senate SAFETEA of 2005
Surface Transportation Program
Takedowns:
FHWA Administrative Expense 1-1/6%	Increased to 1.4%	FHWA administrative takedown changed from a percentage to a specified dollar amount and applied to STP only. [1103]	FHWA takedown eliminated in favor of a direct authorization [1103]
FMCSA Administrative Expense	FMCSA takedown eliminated in favor of a direct authorization	Same as Administration bill [4101]	Same as Administration bill
Metropolitan Planning - 1%	Same as current law	Same as current law	Metropolitan Planning - 1.5% [1103]
Operation Lifesaver-$500K	Increased to $600K	Increased to $600K. Moved to Highway Safety Improvement Program effective in FY 2005. [1401]	Moved to Highway Safety Improvement Program [1402]
Rail-highway Crossings in High Speed Corridors-$5.25M	Same as current law	Increased to $7.5 million for FY 2004 increasing to $15M by FY 2009 [1401]	Same as current law
DBE Training-$10M	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
On-the-Job Training Supportive Services-$10M	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
No comparable provision	Executive Office Complex (E St.) - varies by year	No comparable provision	No comparable provision
No comparable provision	Bike-Ped Safety Grants-$500K	No comparable provision	Same as Administration bill [1607]
No comparable provision	TCSP-$26M	TCSP-$30M in FY 2005, $35M per year thereafter. [1103]	No comparable provision
No comparable provision	Planning Capacity Building-$20M	No comparable provision	Same as Administration bill
No comparable provision	No comparable provision	No comparable provision	New Strategic Highway Research Program - $17,861,635 per year [2001]
Direct authorization, no takedown	No comparable provision	ITS Deployment-Extension of current law program through 2005 funded by takedown of $100M. [1103]	No comparable provision
Direct authorization, no takedown	No comparable provision	Safety Incentive Grants for Use of Seat Belts - Extension of current law program through 2005 funded by takedown of $112M. [1103]	No comparable provision
Direct authorization, no takedown	No comparable provision	Safety Incentive to Prevent Operation of Motor Vehicles by Intoxicated Persons-Extension of current law program through 2005 funded by takedown of $110M. [1103]	No comparable provision
Formula Factors:
25% lane-miles of Federal-aid highways	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
40% VMT on Federal-aid highways	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
35% contributions to Highway Account of Highway Trust Fund	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
Minimum Apportionment:
1/2%	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
Setasides:
State Planning & Research (SPR) - 2%	State Planning & Research - 2.5%	Same as current law	Same as current law
Transportation Enhancements (TE)-10% after SPR setaside	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
Safety-10% after SPR setaside	Eliminated in favor of Highway Safety Improvement Program	Eliminated in favor of Highway Safety Improvement Program effective in FY 2005 [1401]	Eliminated in favor of Highway Safety Improvement Program [1401]
Suballocation to areas-62.5% of amount remaining after SPR, TE and Safety setasides. Amount split based on population between urbanized areas over 200K and all other areas. Within the all other category, an amount equal to 110% of the state's 1991 secondary system apportionment is reserved for use in areas under 5K.	Same as current law. Note: There should have been a conforming amendment to the suballocation to areas to recognize the elimination of the safety setaside.	Before FY 2005, suballocation to areas is same as current law. Beginning FY 2005, suballocation to areas-62.5% of amount remaining after SPR and TE setasides. Amount split based on population between urbanized areas over 200K and all other areas. Within the all other category, an amount equal to 110% of each state's 1991 secondary system apportionment is reserved for use in areas under 5K. [1401]	Same as House [1401], except that the urbanized areas of Norman and Oklahoma City, OK are to be treated as a single area [1705]
No comparable provision	No comparable provision	Motor Vehicle Congestion Relief-10% of the State's total apportionments under NHS, IM, STP and CMAQ programs (but no specific amount or proportion from any one of the named programs) multiplied by the percentage of the State's population in urbanized areas over 200,000 population. [1201]	No comparable provision
No comparable provision	No comparable provision	ITS Deployment [1205]	No comparable provision

Previous | Table of Contents | Next