Formulas, Takedowns, and Setasides - Interstate Maintenance

Formulas, Takedowns, and Setasides
Current Law	Administration Proposal H.R. 2088 & S. 1072 as Modified SAFETEA of 2003	House H.R. 3 as Passed House TEA-LU	Senate H.R. 3 as Passed Senate SAFETEA of 2005
Interstate Maintenance
Takedowns:
FHWA Administrative Expense 1-1/6%	Increased to 1.4%	FHWA administrative takedown limited to STP only. [1103]	FHWA takedown eliminated in favor of a direct authorization [1103]
FMCSA Administrative Expense	FMCSA takedown eliminated in favor of a direct authorization	Same as Administration bill [4101]	Same as Administration bill
Metropolitan Planning - 1%	Same as current law	Same as current law	Metropolitan Planning - 1.5% [1103]
Interstate Maintenance Discretionary Program-$100M per year	Eliminated	Extended through FY 2005, then repealed [1114]	Interstate Maintenance Discretionary Program-$89,308,176 per year [1805]
No comparable provision	No comparable provision	No comparable provision	New Strategic Highway Research Program - $13,396,226 per year [2001]
No comparable provision	Highways for Life-Takedown on Infrastructure Performance and Maintenance Program	Highways for Life-Takedown beginning in FY 2005 at $55M growing to $60M per year thereafter. [1103]	No comparable provision
Formula Factors:
33-1/3% Interstate lane miles	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
33-1/3% Interstate VMT	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
33-1/3 Commercial vehicle contributions to Highway Account of Highway Trust Fund	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
Minimum Apportionment:
1/2% of IM and NHS combined	Same as current law	Same as current law	Same as current law
Setasides:
State Planning & Research-2%	State Planning & Research-2.5%	Same as current law	Same as current law
No comparable provision	No comparable provision	Motor Vehicle Congestion Relief-10% of the State's total apportionments under NHS, IM, STP and CMAQ programs (but no specific amount or proportion from any one of the named programs) multiplied by the percentage of the State's population in urbanized areas over 200,000 population. [1201]	No comparable provision
No comparable provision	No comparable provision	ITS Deployment [1205]	No comparable provision

Previous | Table of Contents | Next