Download an Excel file* of this document: profile_illinois__danville_city.xls.
Table 1. Selected Characteristics | Census 2000 | 2007-2009 ACS | 2010 Census | 2010-2012 ACS | Is the numeric change between Census 2000 and 2010-2012 ACS Significant? ** |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Value | MOE(+/-) | Value | MOE(+/-) | Value | Value | MOE(+/-) | ||
Total Persons 1 | 33,865 | -- | 32,581 | 588 | 33,027 | 32,941 | 457 | -- |
Persons in Households 2 | 31,327 | 196 | 31,135 | -- | 30,605 | 31,339 | -- | -- |
Total Households 3 | 13,252 | 154 | 13,605 | 499 | 12,843 | 12,488 | 484 | Yes |
Average Number of Persons per Household 4 | 2.36 | 0.06 | 2.29 | 0.08 | 2.38 | 2.51 | 0.09 | Yes |
Average Household Income 5 | $40,590 | $1,372 | $43,921 | $4,209 | -- | $46,697 | $3,969 | Yes |
Average Number of Vehicles per Household 6 | 1.48 | 0.04 | 1.40 | 0.10 | -- | 1.40 | 0.09 | No |
Percent of Persons in Poverty 7 | 18.10 | 0.90 | 28.00 | 4.01 | -- | 31.70 | 4.07 | Yes |
Percent Minority 8 | 29.40 | 1.00 | 34.10 | 2.49 | 37.50 | 36.70 | 1.82 | Yes |
Percent of Persons 65 and Over 9 | 16.60 | 0.80 | 15.80 | 1.52 | 14.90 | 14.90 | 1.32 | Yes |
Percent of Persons Foreign Born 10 | 2.90 | 0.40 | 3.20 | 0.83 | -- | 3.80 | 0.88 | No |
Total Workers at Place of Residence11 | 12,878 | 361 | 12,834 | 1,134 | -- | 11,594 | 737 | Yes |
Table 2a. Mode to Work 12 | CTPP2000 | 2007-2009 ACS | 2010-2012 ACS | Is the numeric change between CTPP 2000 and 2010-2012 ACS Significant? ** |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Percent | MOE(+/-)* | Number | Percent | MOE(+/-)* | Number | Percent | MOE(+/-)* | ||
Total Workers | 12,585 | 100.0 | 360 | -- | 100.0 | -- | -- | 100.0 | -- | -- |
Drove alone | 10,000 | 79.5 | 340 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
2-person Carpool | 1,420 | 11.3 | 149 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
3-or-more-person Carpool | 295 | 2.3 | 69 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Transit | 105 | 0.8 | 41 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Bike | 30 | 0.2 | 22 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Walked | 310 | 2.5 | 71 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Taxi, Motorcycle and Other means | 125 | 1.0 | 45 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Worked at Home | 300 | 2.4 | 70 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Table 2b. Mode to Work 12 | CTPP2000 | 2007-2009 ACS | 2010-2012 ACS | Is the numeric change between CTPP 2000 and 2010-2012 ACS Significant? ** |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Percent | MOE(+/-)* | Number | Percent | MOE(+/-)* | Number | Percent | MOE(+/-)* | ||
At Place of Work | ||||||||||
Total Workers | 22,015 | 100.0 | 355 | -- | 100.0 | -- | 21,018 | 100.0 | 1,083 | No |
Drove alone | 18,675 | 84.8 | 370 | -- | -- | -- | 17,785 | 84.6 | 1,105 | No |
2-person Carpool | 2,070 | 9.4 | 178 | -- | -- | -- | 1,733 | 8.2 | 378 | No |
3-or-more-person Carpool | 325 | 1.5 | 73 | -- | -- | -- | 325 | 1.5 | 142 | No |
Transit | 160 | 0.7 | 51 | -- | -- | -- | 204 | 1.0 | 106 | No |
Bike | 30 | 0.1 | 22 | -- | -- | -- | 23 | 0.1 | 38 | No |
Walked | 320 | 1.5 | 72 | -- | -- | -- | 452 | 2.2 | 218 | No |
Taxi, Motorcycle and Other means | 135 | 0.6 | 47 | -- | -- | -- | 194 | 0.9 | 102 | No |
Worked at Home | 300 | 1.4 | 70 | -- | -- | -- | 302 | 1.4 | 153 | No |
Table 3. Mean Travel Time by Mode to Work 13 | Census 2000 | 2007-2009 ACS | 2010-2012 ACS | Is the change in travel time between Census 2000 and 2010-2012 ACS Significant? ** |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minutes | MOE(+/-) | Minutes | MOE(+/-) | Minutes | MOE(+/-) | ||
At Place of Residence | |||||||
Total Workers (does not include workers who worked at home) | 15.8 | 0.7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Drove alone | 15.0 | 0.7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Carpooled | 18.1 | 2.0 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Transit | 28.7 | 9.5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Taxi, Motorcycle, Walk, Bicycle and Other means | 22.1 | 6.1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Notes:
* The coefficient of variation (CV) can be derived by the standard error (SE) divided by the estimate, while SE = MOE/1.645.
** The z-value of the difference of the two estimates are used to determined if the two estimates are significantly different at 90% confidence level.
1 Census 2000 SF3 Table P1; 2007-2009 ACS Table B01003; 2010-2012 ACS Table B01003
2 Census 2000 SF3 Table P9; 2007-2009 ACS Table B09016; 2010-2012 ACS Table B01003 minus Table B26001
3 Census 2000 SF3 Table P10; 2007-2009 ACS Table B19001; 2010-2012 ACS Table B19001
4 Census 2000 SF3 Table P9 divided Census 2000 SF3 Table P10; 2007-2009 ACS Table B09016 divided 2007-2009 ACS Table B19001; 2010-2012 ACS Table S1101
5 CTPP2000 Table 1-090; 2007-2009 ACS Table B19025; 2010-2012 ACS Table B19025
6 Census 2000 SF3 Table H46; 2007-2009 ACS Table B25046; 2010-2012 ACS Table B25046
7 Census 2000 SF3 Table P87; 2007 -2009 ACS Table B17001; 2010-2012 ACS Table B17001
8 Census 2000 SF3 Table P6; 2007-2009 ACS Table B02001; 2010-2012 ACS Table B02001
9 Census 2000 SF3 Table P8; 2007-2009 ACS Table B01001; 2010-2012 ACS Table B01001
10 Census 2000 SF3 Table P21; 2007-2009 ACS Table B06003; 2010-2012 ACS Table B06003
11 Census 2000 SF3 Table P43; 2007-2009 ACS Table B23001; 2010-2012 ACS Table B23025
12 Residence place information is from CTPP2000 Table 1-002; 2007- 2009 ACS Table B08301; 2010-2012 ACS Table B08301. Workplace information is from CTPP2000 Table 2-002; 2007-2009 ACS Table B08406; 2010-2012 ACS Table B08601
13 CTPP2000 1-118; 2007-2009 ACS Table C08136; 2010-2012 ACS Table C08136