Spring 2018 semi-annual plenary meeting | United States: Minneapolis, MN, April 25-26, 2018 |
Fall 2018 semi-annual plenary meeting | Canada: Halifax, NS, November 28-29, 2018 |
Spring 2019 semi-annual plenary meeting | United States Location (TBD), Spring 2019 |
Fall 2019 semi-annual plenary meeting | Canada Location (TBD), Fall 2019 |
Spring 2020 semi-annual plenary meeting | United States Location (TBD), Spring 2020 |
Fall 2020 semi-annual plenary meeting | Canada Location (TBD), Fall 2020 |
The U.S.-Canada TBWG was formed in 2001 to facilitate the safe, secure, efficient, and environmentally responsible movement of people and goods across the Canada-U.S. border. The TBWG brings together multiple transportation and border agencies, and other organizations, to coordinate transportation planning, policy implementation, and the deployment of technology to enhance border infrastructure and operations. As such, this forum fosters on-going communication, information sharing, and the exchange of best practices to improve the transportation, safety and security systems that connect our two countries.
The TBWG is jointly led by the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Transport Canada. Its core membership includes federal, state, and provincial departments/ministries of transportation from both sides of the border, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and the Canada Border Services Agency. Other participants include Global Affairs Canada, the U.S. Department of State, and other partners, such as regional cross-border planning organizations, whose members encompass government agencies devoted to transportation and border issues.
The work of the TBWG is guided by a binational Steering Committee, which is led by Co-chairs from the U.S. Department of Transportation-Federal Highway Administration and Transport Canada. They are joined by representatives from their respective departments and agencies, federal border agencies, representatives of border states/provinces, subcommittee co-chairs, and co-leads on major topics and issues of interest (e.g. border infrastructure, technology, etc.). The Steering Committee meets regularly to plan and coordinate TBWG activities. Steering Committee responsibilities include planning the semi-annual plenary meetings of the TBWG membership in the U.S. and Canada and collaborating on TBWG communications, including the management of the TBWG website TheTBWG.org.
Heather Carriere
Director, Highway, Border and Motor Carrier Policy
Transport Canada
Ken Petty
Director
Office of Planning
U.S. Federal Highway Administration
The TBWG Action Plan will be updated every two years by the TBWG Steering Committee to:
This Action Plan sets out areas of focus for the work of the TBWG:
These work areas are supported by co-leads (both Canadian and U.S. TBWG members), subcommittees or discussion groups. Responsibility for advancing specific TBWG actions and tracking progress under each work area is distributed among the federal lead-agencies (TC and USDOT), co-leads and subcommittee co-chairs. Currently, the areas of focus are:
An important facet of the work of the binational and multi-agency TBWG in its mission to take coordinated action and innovate is the dedicated attention that it gives to differing policy and authority between the two countries. Types of work that are undertaken in this area include the assessment of new and proposed policies when requested by the TBWG Co-chairs. Policy work also provides a connection between TBWG and academic research on U.S.-Canada border issues.
The Policy work of the TBWG is supported by:
Hugh Conroy
Manager, International Mobility & Trade Corridor (IMTC) Program
Whatcom Council of Governments
Tess Sliwinski
Manager/Senior Policy Advisor, Highway, Border and Motor Carrier Policy (ACGF)
Transport Canada
Objectives: Recognizing that changes in border policy have implications for transportation system operations and transportation infrastructure investment:
Needs | Trusted trader programs (generally referred to collectively as the FAST program) and trusted traveller programs (known as the NEXUS Program) could be evaluated by CBSA and U.S. CBP, under the new U.S. Administration, for possible policy and operational changes. Outcomes have implications for the infrastructure linking transportation facilities to inspection facilities and for linking our two countries together. Ongoing review and feedback with respect to program performance, pilot tests, and findings will further TBWG's coordinated planning and investment goals. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Policy |
Outcomes | Discussions at TBWG plenary meetings with trusted trader and traveller program managers and inspection agencies. Sharing of relevant reports with TBWG participants including summaries of discussions held at TBWG plenary meetings or on separate conference calls. |
Next Steps | Await policy direction and guidance from CBSA and U.S. Federal agencies. |
Status | Ongoing. |
Needs | The overall goal in the area of freight planning is to ensure that U.S. and Canadian stakeholders share information on a regular basis to continue to improve the freight transportation infrastructure decision-making process in both countries. This collaboration will support the development of strategies and tactics that enable effective freight transportation planning.Facilitate coordination efforts at an appropriate level between U.S. DOT/Transport Canada, U.S. State DOTs/Canadian Provincial Ministries of Transportation, and U.S. & Canadian regional/local transportation planning agencies. Encourage U.S. and Canadian participation at appropriate cross-border stakeholder meetings. Encourage Canadian participation on U.S. state freight advisory committees for the northern border states. Encourage border master planning concepts. Any processes developed should include freight-specific criteria to prioritize freight projects. Seek opportunities to leverage innovative financing to deliver freight projects. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Policy |
Outcomes | Status updates at TBWG plenary meetings. Identification of opportunity areas to champion binational freight-related projects and policies. Arrange for speakers and presentations on freight issues that are of interest to both governments. Develop freight specific work sessions. |
Next Steps | Status updates at TBWG plenary meetings. |
Status | Ongoing |
Needs | Shared understanding of the implementation of the Land, Rail, Marine and Air Preclearance Agreement. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Policy |
Outcomes | Status updates at TBWG plenary meetings. Identification of opportunity areas to champion preclearance projects and policies. |
Next Steps | Status update on Preclearance at Spring 2018 Plenary, pending additional policy updates from new U.S. Administration and direction from the Canadian Government. |
Status | Ongoing |
Needs | A goal listed in this Action Plan is to "support regional binational coordination efforts." Regional border planning efforts, such as those conducted by the regional border organizations referenced in the 2016 TBWG Memorandum of Cooperation (IMTC, WBWG, & EBTC), were initiated just following an important 1998 policy response to the NAFTA – FHWA's Coordinated Border Infrastructure (CBI) Program. With its annual apportionments to U.S. border states for investments to improve cross-border trade and travel, the CBI Program also included eligibility to fund "international coordination of transportation planning, programming, and border operation with Canada and Mexico." In 2012, the CBI Program was discontinued. Thus, regional border planning efforts have lost a key funding source. The TBWG recognizes that regional border coordination programs meet an important set of needs and are valuable partners that complement TBWG's national-level facilitation and coordination objectives. To adequately sustain such regional efforts, the TBWG encourages our federal governments to consider reestablishing funding programs available to regional border planning efforts. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Policy subject matter co-leads, TBWG co-chairs. |
Outcomes | Discussion and formulation by TBWG of program parameters and funding levels and resulting documentation of this discussion. Research on options for availing similar/symmetrical/complementary programs from both federal transportation agencies. Cross-referencing advisory memos from TBWG co-chairs to their agency's respective legislative offices for proposing authorization of funding for a new program. |
Next Steps | Discussion among TBWG steering committee. Discussion at TBWG plenary. Policy subgroup can develop initial program proposals / collaborate with agency experts as appropriate. Discuss forming a separate working group. |
Status | The formation a working group was raised for consideration at the Spring 2017 TBWG Plenary in Bellingham, WA. Seek consensus at the Fall 2017 Plenary in Calgary, AB and identify working group member base. |
The Planning and Programming work of the TBWG aims to:
In its Planning and Programming work, the TBWG Steering Committee is supported by co-leads on Border Infrastructure.
Melissa Dawn Newhook
Border Policy Advisor
Highway, Border and Motor Carrier Policy
Transport Canada
Chris Dingman
Northern Border Transportation Specialist, U.S. Federal Highway Administration: Michigan Division
Objectives: To support the implementation of the border infrastructure components of Canada and the U.S. infrastructure funding. In addition, to facilitate shared binational understanding and information-sharing on border-related infrastructure projects.
Needs | Shared understanding of status of border infrastructure projects. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Border Infrastructure |
Outcomes | Provide regular updates at TBWG plenary meetings on federal, state, provincial and border operator infrastructure projects; disseminate information related to project openings (i.e. ribbon-cuttings, shovel diggings, etc.). |
Next Steps | Coordinate infrastructure project updates at TBWG plenary meetings, TBWG steering committee calls, and ongoing phone/email communication. |
Status | Ongoing |
Needs | Post regional border master planning and transportation studies and/or web links to the TBWG Website; create a new webpage if necessary to list the plans or links to the plans from the original host websites. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Border Infrastructure |
Outcomes | Add existing border master planning documents and transportation study documents and/or links to the TBWG website. |
Next Steps | Identify existing border master plans and transportation studies that are available on the Internet and link those documents to the TBWG website. |
Status | Ongoing |
Needs | Disseminate information on potential funding sources available at the state, provincial and federal level to support border infrastructure projects and research. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Border Infrastructure |
Outcomes | Disseminate information on potential funding sources available to support border infrastructure projects and research to TBWG participants from the U.S. and Canada so they may apply for funding as needed. |
Next Steps | Coordinate with FHWA and TC on potential funding sources, such as the USDOT TIGER program, FHWA's planning research program and Transport Canada's new National Trade Corridor Program (NTCP). |
Status | Ongoing. FHWA has shared announcements for TIGER, SHRP II and FAST Lane funding opportunities in the U.S. with TBWG members. Transport Canada has shared information on its NTCF. |
Needs | Provide information related to trade and traffic topics for U.S.- Canada bridge border crossings. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Border Infrastructure lead with subject matter experts |
Outcomes | Create Bridge Operator Discussion Group that focuses on U.S.-Canada bridge topics. |
Next Steps | Arrange for speakers and presentations on bridge issues that are of concern to both governments at TBWG plenaries. |
Status | For consideration at Calgary 2017 Fall Plenary |
The Trade and Traffic Data work of the TBWG aims to:
The Trade and Traffic Data work is supported by:
Steve Beningo
International Transportation Specialist, U.S. Department of Transportation: Bureau of Transportation Statistics
Canadian Co-Lead
(Vacant)
Objectives: To coordinate border trade, traffic, and corridor data among TBWG partners with the objectives of:
Needs | TBWG participant feedback and input for the draft modeling framework and accompanying freight flow projections and results for the U.S.DOT-FHWA tri-national freight and passenger traffic flow research project. This project will examine traffic flows at both the macro North American level and the micro border crossing level. Solicit Provide status updates on the project to TBWG participants at upcoming TBWG plenary meetings. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Trade and Traffic Data |
Outcomes | Provide status updates on modeling framework results and freight flow projects, based on North American stakeholder input to TBWG participants. |
Next Steps | Release final report and data visualization tool. |
Status | Post final report on FHWA Border Planning website; awaiting clearance on the data visualization system. |
Needs | Provide a compilation of relevant data sources and data needs as well as freight and passenger flow studies to TBWG participants. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Trade and Traffic Data |
Outcomes | Provide a compilation of relevant data sources and data needs as well as freight and passenger flow studies. |
Next Steps | Provide status update at TBWG plenary meetings on data sources added to the TBWG website. |
Status | Ongoing |
Needs | Provide information related to NATS to TBWG participants through the formation of a working group dedicated specifically to reporting such data (with Steve Beningo from U.S.DOT-Bureau of Transportation Statistics as lead). |
---|---|
Responsibility | Trade and Traffic Data |
Outcomes | Form working group dedicated to identifying transportation statistics available to TBWG participants and provide status updates at the TBWG plenary meetings. |
Next Steps | Form a working group, identify data needs, post available data to TBWG website, and provide status updates at TBWG plenary meetings. |
Status | Ongoing |
The TBWG mission includes facilitating discussion and coordination of the role of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and other technology that will improve the efficient movement of goods and people across the U.S./Canada border.
The Deployment of Technology work of the TBWG is supported by:
Tiffany Julien
Freight Management Specialist
U.S. Federal Highway Administration
Howard Posluns
Head, Development Unit
Transportation Development Centre
Transport Canada
Objectives: Working with a number of different U.S. and Canadian stakeholders, the TBWG promotes the use of the technology and other tools, including the Border Information Flow Architecture (BIFA) to help ensure institutional agreement and technical integration for ITS & other technology projects at major land border crossings.
Desired outcomes include: identification of technologies and agencies that use technologies at or near the border; fully coordinated border ITS/technology deployments; integration of technology considerations into the planning process; interoperability of technologies; reduced technology investment cost; and enhanced information exchange, coordination, and communication.
Ongoing work/areas of interest include:
Needs | Identify technology-based solutions for the monitoring, measurement, and prediction of BWT; review and evaluate the pilot projects that were initiated through grants provided by the FHWA in summer 2016. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Technology |
Outcomes | Status updates at TBWG plenary meetings; review and evaluate the pilot projects that were initiated through grants provided by the FHWA in summer 2016. |
Next Steps | FHWA Office of Freight & Operations to provide status updates at TBWG plenary meetings and disseminate information on future BWT measurement initiatives/application process. FHWA Office of Freight & Operations to provide relevant status update on initiative at future Plenary sessions. |
Status | Ongoing. Information on the FHWA grant program was disseminated. Several grants were announced by FHWA in summer 2016. Note: In November 2016, the Office of the Auditor General Canada released its audit report on Beyond the Border Action Plan, including the Border Wait Time Initiative. The report recommended that the Government of Canada should assess the benefits of the existing BWT technology investments. As a result, Transport Canada and the Canada Border Services Agency are currently working to address those recommendations. In light of the audit report, the approach to border wait time measurement going forward is being examined by Canada and will also be informed by the U.S. pilot projects currently underway. |
Needs | Make recommendations and undertake activities that will raise awareness of the role of ITS and technology in improving the efficiency of goods and people movement across the U.S.-Canada border. Provide a model for integrating technology deployment as part of facility modernization or infrastructure improvement, including operations and maintenance through state DOT implementation. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Technology |
Outcomes | TBD |
Next Steps | Provide updates at TBWG plenary meetings |
Status | Ongoing |
Needs | The continued deployment of RFID technology is an accepted strategy in the border transportation planning discipline. While RFID is a potential source of significant system capacity and border wait-time reduction, individuals' acquisition of non-NEXUS RFID documents, primarily state and provincial enhanced drivers' licenses (EDLs), has remained too low to generate such results. The need is to identify and evaluate strategies that could complement inspection-agency investments in RFID reader hardware by significantly increasing the share of non-NEXUS cross-border trips made by individuals using an RFID. TBWG was established in part to support binational applications of information technology to improve border operations and explore alternatives to infrastructure-based capacity. RFID hardware installation is already a binational strategy under BTB. Effective strategies to increase RFID use by travelers will also need to be binational and multi-agency – requirements that align well with the composition of TBWG. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Technology |
Outcomes | Under this action item, TBWG will be a forum to identify and evaluate strategies to optimize the effectiveness of RFID technology at border crossings. The TBWG Steering Committee will:
|
Next Steps | Arrange for a multi-agency discussion at a future TBWG Plenary. |
Status | Ongoing |
Needs | Sharing information on advancements on AV/CV. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Technology |
Outcomes | Provide updates at TBWG plenary meetings on federal, state, and provincial projects relevant to border crossing; disseminate information related to pilot projects and/or announcements (i.e. ribbon-cuttings, demonstration projects, etc.). |
Next Steps | Provide update at TBWG plenary meetings on latest developments in AV/CV. Arrange for speakers and presentations on AV/CV that are of interest to both governments at TBWG Plenaries. |
Status | Ongoing |
The Cross-Border Rail work of the TBWG aims to:
In its Cross-Border Rail work is supported by:
Barbara Barr
Director, International Programs
U.S. Federal Railroad Administration
Kimberly MacDonald
Manager, Rail Policy
Transport Canada
Objectives: Ongoing functions of the Cross-Border Rail Discussion Group include:
Needs | Cross-Border Rail Discussion Group focuses on both passenger and freight rail topics such as:
|
---|---|
Responsibility | Rail Discussion Group |
Outcomes | Arrange for speakers and presentations on rail issues that are of concern to both governments. |
Next Steps | Status updates and presentations/discussion at TBWG Plenary meetings. |
Status | Ongoing |
This work area is supported by the:
TBWG Steering Committee
TBWG Co-Chairs: | |
Heather Carriere Director, Highway, Border and Motor Carrier Policy Transport Canada |
Ken Petty Director Office of Planning U.S. Federal Highway Administration |
Steering Committee Coordinators: | |
Melissa Dawn Newhook Border Policy Advisor, Highway, Border and Motor Carrier Policy Transport Canada |
Tricia Harr Team Leader, Border & Interstate Planning Team Office of Planning U.S. Federal Highway Administration |
Objectives:
Ongoing functions of the Steering Committee include:
Needs | Coordinate, collaborate, and exchange best practices to allow for better cross-collaboration between the TBWG and JWC. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Steering Committee |
Outcomes | Create a conference planning document and identify future TBWG meeting locations and possible meeting dates to allow members to plan for attendance. Create a list of both Canada-U.S. and U.S.-Mexico border meetings for 2018-2020 to allow for better cross-collaboration and to maximize participation of border stakeholders. |
Next Steps | Create a conference planning document and list of upcoming Canada – U.S. and U.S. - Mexico border meetings in 2018 & 2019. |
Status | Ongoing. FHWA and TC to updated conference planning document. |
Needs | Canada – U.S. border stakeholders and TBWG Steering Committee members look to the TBWG website as a "one-stop shop" for border planning needs and the website should provide current, timely information on border topics. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Steering Committee |
Outcomes | Update the TBWG website in a timely manner to disseminate information to participants in a timely fashion. |
Next Steps | FHWA to host the TBWG website. Specific updates to the website include:
|
Status | Ongoing. FHWA to continue transferring the TBWG website and content from TC to FHWA and will create an online calendar for TBWG events. |
Needs | Documentation of the TBWG plenary meetings is needed as a reference tool for past attendees and for those stakeholders unable to attend the meetings in person. Comprehensive documentation is needed to show the TBWG Steering Committee's progress towards project, policy, and research implementation along the Canada-U.S. border to government officials, stakeholders, and the general public. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Steering Committee |
Outcomes | Reports prepared after each TBWG plenary meeting and disseminated to the membership. |
Next Steps | TC and FHWA will prepare a report after each TBWG plenary meeting and disseminate the report to members directly via email and/or the TBWG website. |
Status | Ongoing. Summary report on the Spring 2017 plenary in Bellingham was completed and shared with members. |
Needs | Continue to refine new structure for TBWG Plenary Meetings |
---|---|
Responsibility | Co-Chairs: Tess Sliwinski (TC), Ken Petty (FHWA) Members: Melissa Dawn Newhook(TC), Melissa Fanucci (IMTC) |
Outcomes | Implement potential improvements to the structure/content of TBWG plenary meetings based upon plenary structure/content alternatives presented to TBWG participants at the 2016 Fall Plenary, as well as subsequent feedback from post-plenary surveys. |
Next Steps | Solicit feedback on ongoing plenary format. Present and discuss TBWG plenary structure / content options at the Fall 2017 plenary. Obtain TBWG membership direction on refinements / next steps. |
Status | Continue to incorporate tenets of the WG proposal into the TBWG plenary meetings. |
Needs | Develop new Action Plan document for 2018-2020. |
---|---|
Responsibility | Steering Committee: Tricia Harr (FHWA) and Melissa Dawn Newhook (TC) |
Outcomes | Identify suitable binational activities the TBWG members wish to undertake to advance the border transportation planning discipline. Solicit feedback from TBWG Steering Committee and stakeholders. Present Draft Action Plan at Fall 2017 Plenary, incorporate feedback, and finalize Action Plan 2018-2020. Begin work on Action Plan activities after the Fall 2017 Plenary. |
Next Steps | Draft Action Plan to be discussed with TBWG membership and finalized at the Fall 2017 Plenary in Calgary. |
Status | Draft Plan share in the registration packaged and discussion session scheduled for Day 1. |