Section 5.2 | School Buses (1) |
---|---|
2. Title | School Bus Crashworthiness Research Report |
3. Author | Research and Development, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) |
4. Year of Study | April 2002 |
5. Source | http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/ nrd-11/SchoolBus/SBReportFINAL.pdf |
6. Objective/Purpose | A report on school bus-related fatalities |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | School bus |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Every year, the nation's 450,000 public school buses travel more than 4.3 billion miles to transport 23.5 million children to and from school and school-related activities (more than 10 billion student rides annually). It also has data on annual school bus production from 1995-2000, by types (A-D). |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | National-level data |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | Year 2002 |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This report provides important national-level information regarding the total number of public school bus, travel mileage as well as the total number of riders on an annual basis. The statistics are widely cited in highway fatality studies. |
Section 5.2 | School Buses (2) |
2. Title | On-Road Motor Vehicle Activity |
3. Author | California Air Resources Board |
4. Year of Study | 1995 |
5. Source | http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/resnotes/notes/95-9.htm |
6. Objective/Purpose | This work provides data for improving several segments of the database that is used to calculate the Air Resources Board's mobile source emissions inventory. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Statewide Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR) Smog Check program data of 1991 (January-December) and 1993 (January-June) were used in conjunction with DMV vehicle registration data to develop county-specific mileage accumulation rates for autos, light-duty vehicles, and medium-duty vehicles; For bus activity, the investigator reviewed publicly available data on, and developed a methodology for, characterization of transit bus fleets and their activity, by county. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | School bus |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | California Highway Patrol safety inspection data provided the basis for the work on school buses. The statewide school bus population is 23,900. Annual school bus VMT is 317 million statewide or 13,000 per bus. Diesel buses account for a large majority of the statewide school bus population (81 percent) and VMT (84 percent). Gasoline buses account for most of the remaining fleet and vehicle miles traveled. Over half of the statewide bus population is made up of buses over 33,000 pounds GVW and these buses account for more than half the statewide school VMT. For school buses, mileage accumulation rates (MAR) are higher for light heavy-duty buses (16,000 miles per year) than for heavy heavy-duty buses (12,500 miles per year). Contractor school buses exhibit considerably higher MARs (19,000) than either public school buses (13,000) or private school buses (9,200). The median age of contractor buses is considerably less than that of public school buses (4 years versus 11 years). The school bus mileage accumulation rate does not decrease with vehicle age. |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This is an example of statewide estimation of school bus fleet size and VMT using highway patrol safety data. |
Section 5.2 | School Buses (3) |
2. Title | SBF's Top 100 School District Fleets of 2002 |
3. Author | School Bus Fleet |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | http://www.schoolbusfleet.com/STATS/PDF/TOP100_2002.PDF |
6. Objective/Purpose | |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Bus fleet size and passenger load size for top 100 school districts |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This article summarizes the top 100 school districts fleet and might be useful for our study. |
Section 5.2 | School Buses (4) |
2. Title | SBF's Top 50 Contractor Fleets of 2002 |
3. Author | School Bus Fleet |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | http://www.schoolbusfleet.com/STATS/PDF/SBF6TOP50.PDF |
6. Objective/Purpose | |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Bus fleet size and passenger load size for top 50 school bus contractors |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This article summarizes the top 50 school districts fleet and might be useful for our study. |
Section 5.2 | School Buses (5) |
2. Title | SBF's Annual School District Survey - 2000 |
3. Author | School Bus Fleet |
4. Year of Study | 2000 |
5. Source | |
6. Objective/Purpose | |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Respondents reported that approximately one out of five students who are eligible for transportation choose not to ride the bus. The breakdown of school districts reporting eligible non-riders shows that, of the 218 school districts that responded to this question, about 41 percent (89) reported that 0 to 10 percent of their eligible riders do not take the bus. About 23 percent (50) said that their percentage ranged from 11 to 20 percent. Eleven school districts reported that 50 percent or more of their eligible students did not regularly ride the bus. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Based on the statistics from this survey, we can estimate the approximate percentage of eligible students who are actually riding school buses. |
Section 5.2 | School Buses (6) |
2. Title | 2001-2025 Regional Transportation Plan |
3. Author | Pima Association of Governments, Arizona |
4. Year of Study | 2001 |
5. Source | http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/RTP/rtp2025/march2001/ |
6. Objective/Purpose | The transportation plan provides a 25-year vision for a balanced, multimodal, sustainable transportation system for eastern Pima County, including the need for a shuttle to transport school kids. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Provides several summary statistics describing the anticipated growth in travel demand (including school bus) for the metropolitan area. Typical Weekday school bus trips are expected to increase from 82,386 to 119,054, approximately 45 percent growth between 2000 and 2025. Trips by automobile are expected to increase from 2.8 to 4.5 million per day, while trips by transit are expected to increase from 65,000 to 108,300 per day. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | Forecasting to 2025 |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | School bus is a very brief section in this report. However, it provides important information on the growth rate of school bus trip in comparison with other modes. |
Section 5.2 | School Buses (7) |
2. Title | Draft Model Specifications for the Houston-Galveston Region |
3. Author | Parsons Brinckerhoff Ltd (PB) in affiliation with Midwest System Sciences, Urban Analytics, RSM Services, Inc. |
4. Year of Study | 1998 |
5. Source | http://www.hgac.cog.tx.us/transportation/pdfs/ travelsurveys/draft_specs.pdf |
6. Objective/Purpose | |
7. General/Literature Review | The treatment of school bus travel is considerably more complicated and does not easily lend itself to inclusion in the model choice model. Representation of school bus routing and district definition and associated limitations would entail a substantial amount of data collection and network coding. It is also quite difficult to predict the provision of such service and its parameters in the future. Therefore, school bus travel can either be represented by decreasing the person trip matrix by a constant (global) percentage to reflect the absence of school bus trips, or a base year trip matrix could be constructed (with a reasonable level of smoothing at the zonal level) from survey data and used to modify the person trip matrix. |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | It provides a brief overview about how school bus trips are accounted for in trip table estimation. |
Section 5.3 | Fixed Shuttle Services (1) |
2. Title | Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, Interim Handbook |
3. Author | Richard H. Pratt |
4. Year of Study | 2000 |
5. Source | http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_webdoc_12.pdf |
6. Objective/Purpose | |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Vanpooling was doubling each year in the 1974 to 1980 period, reaching on the order of 15,000 vanpools in the United States. However, with cheaper gasoline and periodic changes in large-employer trip reduction requirements, vanpooling has declined since. In total, there are 8,500 vanpools or more in operation in the United States as of 1998-1999, roughly half of all vanpools are now third-party operated, with the rest split between employer and owner-operator vanpools. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | Typical vanpooler sacrifices 10 to 12 minutes of travel time compared to driving alone, trading time off against other attributes such as reduced travel cost and stress. Vanpooling accounts for 0.2-0.3 percent of all journey to work travel nationally. Vanpool mode share increases ranging from 70 percent to a triple tripling of usage have been reported in response to substantial or total fare subsidy. All vanpool program trip length averages fall within the range of 26-42 miles one-way (compared to the national average of just over 10 miles for solo auto driver commute trips, and 5 miles for the average unlinked transit trip). Vanpool passengers tend to have socioeconomic profiles more like auto commuters than transit riders. |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This is the most comprehensive document that provides in-depth analysis on commuters' response to vanpool programs and quantifying vanpooling impacts. It also describes several successful vanpool programs such as the 3M Company Employer-Based Vanpool Program, Golden Gate Vanpool Transportation Demonstration Project, Connecticut's Easy Street Vanpool Program and Pace Vanpool and Subscription Bus Programs in Suburban Chicago. |
Section 5.3 | Fixed Shuttle Services (2) |
2. Title | Psrc Travel Model Improvement (Draft Report) |
3. Author | Cambridge Systematics, Inc. |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | |
6. Objective/Purpose | Develop a vanpool model to determine the auto and transit modes from which the vanpoolers shift when new vanpools are provided. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Puget Sound Region, Washington |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Vanpool |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | The ridership factor (average passenger number for each van) is 7.04 for Kitsap county, 8.56 for Pierce county and 8.63 for Snohomish county. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | The vanpool model was estimated based on a vanpool survey database for King County that has information vanpool service inventory and commuters' prior modes, and vanpool surveys for Kitsap, Pierce and Snohomish counties that have data on vanpool inventory but do not have information on prior modes. |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | In Seattle, travel surveys on existing vanpooling trips and inventories of the vanpool services were used to evaluate vanpool market. |
Section 5.3 | Fixed Shuttle Services (3) |
2. Title | Puget Sound Regional Vanpool Market Study |
3. Author | Washington State Department of Transportation |
4. Year of Study | 2000 |
5. Source | http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mobility/TDM/vanpoolmarket.htm |
6. Objective/Purpose | To assess the current vanpool market and recommend future growth opportunities for vanpooling in the Puget Sound Region. It identified a number of market characteristics and conditions that contribute to the region's success with vanpooling and produced a new picture of commuter attitudes, behaviors, and potential mode shifts. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Puget Sound Region |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | This region leads the nation in vanpooling, providing 40% of public vanpools in the nation (with 1250 public vanpools and 200 private vanpools by 1999). There are 2% of commuters now regularly taking advantage of this commute option. For commuters who travel more than 20 miles each way, vanpool has reached a 7% market share (in comparison, transit has a 13% share). Vanpooling has continued to grow steadily ever since. It experienced a growth of more than 60% between 1995 and 1999. Growth in this system has averaged 121 vans and 1200 commuters each year. It is estimated that public vanpools eliminate 11,000 vehicles and 22,000 trips every year; vanpools in the region reduce travel mileage of SOVs by 2.7 million miles annually. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This article includes important statistics on vanpool market. |
Section 5.3 | Fixed Shuttle Services (4) |
2. Title | Market Research Evaluation of Actions to Reduce Suburban Traffic Congestion: Commuter Travel Behavior and Response to Demand Reduction Actions |
3. Author | F.S. Koppelman, J.L. Schofer, C.R. Bhat and R. Gremley |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | |
6. Objective/Purpose | A vanpool model was developed to provide information about the effect on vanpool propensity of difference in the proposed services based on state-preference survey data. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Commuter behavior and future ride sharing intentions using a sample of commuters employed in the suburban Chicago area. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | SP survey |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | In Chicago, stated preference surveys of travelers were collected to determine the fleet of proposed vanpool services. |
Section 5.4 | Private Transport Services (1) |
2. Title | Elasticities for Taxicab Fares and Service Availability |
3. Author | Schaller, B (Schaller Consulting, USA) |
4. Year of Study | 1999 |
5. Source | Transportation, 1999/08. 26(3) pp. 283-97 (8 Refs.) |
6. Objective/Purpose | Examine the effects of taxi fare increases on trip demand and the availability of taxi service. |
7. General/Literature Review | The paper mentioned a 1978 study funded by the U.S. DOT sought to estimate fare elasticities in 24 cities using time series data for periods that encompassed a fare increase and a 1990 cross section study of 26 Canadian cities. |
8. Location/methods/models | New York City Regression models are developed for fares, fare revenue and cab availability measured by total taxi industry mileage operated without passengers. Revenue per mile can be used to estimate empty taxi rides. Some what if scenarios are simulated using the estimated models. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Taxi |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | The elasticity of trip demand with respect to fares is estimated to be -0.22; the elasticity of service availability with respect to the taxi fare is 0.28; and the elasticity of service availability with respect to total supply of service is near 1.0. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | Provide trends during the years, but in percentage changes from year to year. Provide figures for adjusted revenue per mile that vary from $1.02 to $1.25 during these years. Total empty taxi miles vary from 80-105 Million during these years. |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | Taximeter and odometer reading were available from 1990 to 1996 (3 data points per year per taxi) |
14. Data sources | A unique time series dataset from New York City including fare revenue and service availability. Fare revenue and service availability are estimated from taximeter and odometer readings gathered during taxicabs inspections (each cab is inspected 3 times a year). A total of 89,000 data points. |
15. If forecasts are included | Only estimates to compare with actual including some what if scenarios. No future year forecasts are available. |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | The model for total taxi industry mileage operated without passengers can be very useful to cover the empty taxi rides. The paper provides the important variables to model taxi revenue per mile (economic activity, taxi fare, transit fare) (can provide estimate of passenger miles) and taxi empty trips (economic activity, taxi fare, supply). |
Section 5.4 | Private Transport Services (2) |
2. Title | A Macroscopic Taxi Model for Passenger Demand, Taxi Utilization and Level of Services |
3. Author | Hai Yang, Yan Wing Lau, Sze Chun Wong, Hong Kam Lo |
4. Year of Study | 2000 |
5. Source | Transportation, 27(3): 317-340 |
6. Objective/Purpose | Develops a simultaneous equation system of passenger demand, taxi utilization, and level of services based on a taxi service situation found in the urban area of Hong Kong over the last 10 years. |
7. General/Literature Review | A set of variables is introduced including number of licensed taxis, taxi fare, disposable income, occupied taxi journey time as exogenous variables and daily taxi passenger demand, passenger waiting time, taxi availability, taxi utilization and average taxi waiting time as endogenous variables. |
8. Location/methods/models | Hong Kong The different variables are coupled together through a system of nonlinear simultaneous equations whose parameters are estimated from survey data. Models are developed for: passenger waiting time, percentage of occupied taxis, vacant taxi headway, daily taxi passenger trips, and taxi waiting time. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Taxi |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | From overseas so not of interest, however in Hong Kong 15250 urban taxis carry more than one million trips per day. In some areas of Hong Kong taxis form about 25% to 60% of the traffic stream overall. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | Every minute between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays. |
14. Data sources | Roadside observations surveys and taxi stand surveys are conducted yearly gathering information regarding passenger/taxi waiting time at operative taxi stands and percentage of occupied/vacant taxis and taxi headway on some major selected road locations. |
15. If forecasts are included | Predicts level of taxi service and conduct sensitivity analysis for the introduction of any new taxi policies. Forecasts are made for the years 86-95 to compare with observed data. Forecasts are made for different policy variables. |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This is from overseas but methodological relevant, and also provides the important variables for modeling taxi. |
Section 5.4 | Private Transport Services (3) |
2. Title | The Role of the Private-for-Hire Vehicle Industry in Public Transit |
3. Author | Gilbert, G., Cook, T., Nalevanko A., and Everett-Lee, L. |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | TCRP Report 75, TRB |
6. Objective/Purpose | To compile relevant information on the private-for-hire (PHV) industry and how it can best be incorporated into public transportation services and to engage the PHV and transit industries in the consideration of service collaboration. |
7. General/Literature Review | The report include 1) definitions of the nature and scope of the PHV industry; 2) description of the salient characteristics of the industry; 3) provision of whatever information is available on these salient characteristics. There is a literature review mentioning among others a 1981 and 1986 national taxicab survey. Include some relevant statistics about the type of service provided and coverage. The second part of the report present a more detailed case study of 8 urban areas. |
8. Location/methods/models | National Detailed case studies from: Ann Arbor, DuPage County, IL; Huston, Los Angeles, Montgomery County, MD., Portland, Seattle and the Wisconsin State. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Taxicabs, shuttles, limousines, and jitneys |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | The survey included 29,551 sedans, 2,788 mini-vans, 3,948 vans, 1078 mini buses, and 1,494 buses. Examples from the case studies: Ann-Arbor average annual one-way trips: ADA Paratransit - 39,000 night rides, guaranteed ride home - 147,700. Los Angeles - ADA paratransit: 1.7 million trips. There are such data to all 8 case studies. Data also includes passengers per service hour, average weekday ridership, and some financial data. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | Provide only general statistics |
14. Data sources | A national survey of PHV. 677 PHV operators responded to the survey (only a 5.6% response rate) |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | The report and the literature review have some relevant statistic. |
Section 5.4 | Private Transport Services (4) |
2. Title | Taxi and Livery Statistics and Taxi Travel and the 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey |
3. Author | Webster, A.L. |
4. Year of Study | 1997 |
5. Source | http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/6777/taxi.html and http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/6777/npts95.pdf (inactive links) |
6. Objective/Purpose | Present statistics on taxi cab usage nationwide |
7. General/Literature Review | Include many statistical data about taxis in the United States |
8. Location/methods/models | Nationwide |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Taxicabs |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | Various sources. The second report is based mostly on analysis of the 1995 NTPS. |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | There is relevant statistics. We should obtain the reports. |
Section 5.5 | Paratransit and Social Services (1) |
2. Title | The Effect of Education Programs on Paratransit Demand of People with Disabilities |
3. Author | Fitzgerald, J., Shaunesey, D. and Stern, S. |
4. Year of Study | 2000 |
5. Source | Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 34, 261-285 |
6. Objective/Purpose | Describe a passenger education program to encourage responsible use of paratransit by people with disabilities, evaluate the effects of the education program and to provide some cost/benefit analysis of it. However, it includes some interesting statistics. |
7. General/Literature Review | Includes some data and general trends of paratransit services for people with disabilities in different areas from the United States. |
8. Location/methods/models | Charlottesville, VA. An econometric model for number of trips as a count data model where the number of trips in month t for person I, is modeled as a Poisson random variable. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Average number of trips per month is 5.02 with high variance. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | Data are available from May 97 to April 98. The analysis is monthly. |
14. Data sources | From FTA Section 15, included are data from 209 demand response systems located in cities of no more than 400,000 people. Other data used in the analysis include: 1) the local paratransit provider administrative records providing information on each trip taken providing information of trips taken per month and characteristics of the individual taking trips; 2) Charlottesville Transit Service administrative records including information on each person applying for the paratransit service. |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Provide some data on paratransit usage from a United States city. |
Section 5.5 | Paratransit and Social Services (2) |
2. Title | Paratransit Productivity Enhancement Through Service Simulation Phase II Report: Model Development |
3. Author | Stasiak-RT; Turner-PA; Pendyala-R; Polzin-SE |
4. Year of Study | 1998 |
5. Source | Florida Department of Transportation, Office of Research, P.O. Box 1029, Gainesville, FL, 32602, USA |
6. Objective/Purpose | Develop a simulation capability to be used to evaluate various paratransit service delivery and characteristics and policies. |
7. General/Literature Review | A number of demographic, socioeconomic, technical, and institutional trends have increased public attention paid to paratransit services. This has spurred a great deal of interest in determining how to effectively and efficiently serve this growing market. The genesis of the research stems from an earlier effort to identify literature addressing the theoretical maximum productivity of paratransit operations in a given demographic environment. Virtually no operations research or simulation work that addressed this topic was found in the literature or known to experts that were contacted. It became obvious that no systematic evaluation of paratransit productivity issues had ever been carried out using an urban simulation model or optimization approach. Thus, this research effort was undertaken to develop such a capability through a multi-step process involving an urban land use and transportation network, a paratransit trip generation model, and a service delivery model consisting of a vehicle dispatching algorithm. The overall framework was modeled after the simulation efforts common in the 1970s that used network simulation models to test various urban forms and fixed route transit delivery scenarios to evaluate energy efficiency and productivity. |
8. Location/methods/models | Florida Simulation |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Need to get the full text to finalize. |
Section 5.5 | Paratransit and Social Services (3) |
2. Title | Social Service Transportation Assets in the St. Louis, Missouri Area |
3. Author | East-West Gateway Coordinating Council |
4. Year of Study | 1996 |
5. Source | ftp://ftp.ewgateway.org/library/sst.pdf |
6. Objective/Purpose | This is a survey of paratransit operators in the St. Louis, Missouri Area, providing statistics about their assets and trips provided. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | St. Louis, Missouri |
9. Type of vehicle or service | 29 different agencies including transportation only service, transportation as key service, and transportation as support service. Type of services included are: Elderly/persons with disabilities, prescribed day care, and medical trips. |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | For 1995, 431 vehicles were surveyed, making 1,764,588 trips (annual data), 1,589,077 vehicles hours, with average of 1.11 trips per vehicle hour, and 341 monthly trips per vehicle. Some additional data based on the 29 agencies that responded to the questionnaire:
The data are further break down by type of providers. |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | Data are provided only at annual and monthly levels. |
14. Data sources | Survey of operators including the purpose for which transportation was provided, service area, service hours, unused vehicle miles, rider eligibility, type of service, fees/fares, trip frequency, operating and capital budget and more. |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Present some actual data of paratransit services that may be of interest. |
Section 5.5 | Paratransit and Social Services (4) |
2. Title | APTA 2001 Public Transportation Fact Book |
3. Author | APTA |
4. Year of Study | 2001 |
5. Source | 52nd edition, produced by Member Service Department, Information Services Group |
6. Objective/Purpose | Provides national-level transit data. The data include demand responsive services. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Nationwide |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Information on buses and vans |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Data for 1999:
|
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | Data for 1999:
|
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | Data are provided only at annual levels. |
14. Data sources | Various sources from DOT, FTA, and APTA surveys. |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Present some actual data of paratransit services that may be of interest. |
Section 5.5 | Paratransit and Social Services (5) |
2. Title | Fact Book 2002 - Paratransit and Contracting Division |
3. Author | Taxicab, Limousine and Paratransit Association |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | |
6. Objective/Purpose | Present facts regarding paratransit |
7. General/Literature Review | No literature review |
8. Location/methods/models | Nationwide, based on a questionnaire of 23 members of the paratransit and contracting division |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Sedan, van, and minibus. Show distribution of revenue by services, the largest is medical (34.7%) followed by transit agencies (17.7%) and city/county (15.4%), other social services (11%) and private health care (9.5% in addition to the medical). |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Average annual mile per vehicle 36,563, annual hours per vehicle 2,124 (this info is also available by type of vehicle: sedan, van and minibus) |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | Average trip length 8.71 miles and 0.7 hours. (This info is also available by type of vehicle: sedan, van, and minibus.) |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | Questionnaire of 23 members of the paratransit and contracting division |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Show relevant statistics. There is more statistics in the reports. |
Section 5.5 | Paratransit and Social Services (6) |
2. Title | Fact Book 2002 - Limousine and Sedan Division |
3. Author | Taxicab, Limousine and Paratransit Association |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | |
6. Objective/Purpose | Present facts regarding limousine and sedan services. |
7. General/Literature Review | No literature review |
8. Location/methods/models | Nationwide, based on a questionnaire of 34 members of the Limousine and Sedan division. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Sedans, limousine, passenger vans, mini coach, and buses. Show distribution of revenue by services, the largest is airport transfers (55.4%) followed by other (16%) and hotel/resort (9.1%), nights on the town (9%) and weddings (6.6% ). |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Average annual mile per vehicle vary by type of vehicle (sedans 54,194, vans 23,000-39,000, etc. Average number of trips per week by vehicle type (sedans- 44, vans 4-19, Limo- 2-15, bus - 7. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | Average minimum number of hours per booking vary by type of vehicle (sedans 1.7 hrs, limo 2.9-3.3 hrs, vans 2.5-3 hrs, bus 4.8 hrs) |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | Questionnaire of 34 members of the Limousine and Sedan division |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Show relevant statistics. There is more statistics in the reports. |
Section 5.5 | Paratransit and Social Services (7) |
2. Title | Fact Book 2002 - Taxicab Division |
3. Author | Taxicab, Limousine and Paratransit Association |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | |
6. Objective/Purpose | Present facts regarding taxi services. |
7. General/Literature Review | No literature review |
8. Location/methods/models | Nationwide, based on a questionnaire of 87 members of the Taxi division |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Taxi. Show distribution of services by revenue (private individuals 34.8%, private companies 11.4%, airport 10.3%, social service agencies 9.5%, hotel and hospitals 7% each, transit authorities and city/county 6% each. |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Annual miles per taxi 54,214. Annual trips per taxi 6,040. annual passengers per taxi 7,913. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | Average distance per taxi trip 5.8 miles. Average passengers per trip 1.31. Average CBD to airport trip 15.5 miles. |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | Questionnaire of 87 members of the taxi division |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Show relevant statistics. There is more statistics in the reports. |
Section 5.6 | Rental Cars (1) |
2. Title | T.F. Green Airport Master Plan Update |
3. Author | |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | |
6. Objective/Purpose | There is one section in the master plan update that is about rental car facilities near the airport. The T.F. Green airport master plan intends to consolidate all rental car activities to eliminate the need for shuttle service to off-airport locations, free up garage space in the RIAC garage for passenger parking and reduce on-airport and Post Road rental car traffic. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Rental cars |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | RIAC Rental Car Survey (September 2000) conducted by RIAC garage near the airport. Useful data include rental car needs as provided by rental car companies: 1) annual car rentals, 2) average daily rentals, and 3) maximum daily rental. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | Forecasts for 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2020 |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | Airport rental car facilities |
17. Importance to our study | It would be very useful to acquire the detailed rental car survey, if it is available. |
Section 5.6 | Rental Cars (2) |
2. Title | Regional Study on Tourism/Commuter Trips (A PowerPoint Presentation for Workshop #2) |
3. Author | Florida Department of Transportation - District Five |
4. Year of Study | October, 1999 |
5. Source | |
6. Objective/Purpose | The presentation talked about five types of travel characteristic surveys, including Hotel/Motel Survey, Major Attractions Survey, Airport Survey, Rental Cars Survey, and Roadside Origin/Destination Survey. The objective of the surveys is to provide travel data for the enhancement of Florida DOT, District Five's Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure models, to obtain data necessary for the development of generation rates for tourist, visitors and commuter trips; to obtain statistics necessary for the development of external station data; and to develop data that can be used for other purposes such as tourist/visitor demographic profiles, travel characteristic information and summarize traffic problems. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Rental cars |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This is a workshop presentation talking about the importance of different survey types (including a Rental Car Survey) and how they can be used to improve existing models; but it does not have any real data in the presentation itself. It would be very useful if we can acquire the actual rental car survey method and results. |
Section 5.6 | Rental Cars (3) |
2. Title | Palm Beach International Airport Monthly Rental Car Gross Revenue with Passenger Data |
3. Author | |
4. Year of Study | |
5. Source | http://www.pbia.org/news.htm |
6. Objective/Purpose | Report monthly rental car gross revenue and passenger for the rental companies located in or near the airport. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Rental cars |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | Monthly report during the period 09/2001-10/2002 |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | Airport |
17. Importance to our study | It gives us a good example of the source for rental car passenger data. |
Section 5.6 | Rental Cars (4) |
2. Title | Travel Demand Forecasting: Service and Patronage Impact Assessment Methodology Report. Prepared for Sacramento Regional Transit District. |
3. Author | DKS under subcontract to Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT) |
6. Objective/Purpose | An Airport Passenger Ground Access Model is developed to estimate the mode-to-airport choice based on a state preference survey. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Location: The model is developed for Sacramento's Downtown/Natomas/Airport (DNA) Corridor. Model: Rental car is one out of six airport access modes being modeled: Drive and park, rental car, get picked up/dropped off, taxi/shuttle van, public transit, and other courtesy van/dedicated hotel van. 1) Renting cost, 2) time to/from the terminal, 3) in-vehicle time, and 4) parking cost at destination are the attributes being modeled for the rental car mode. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | State Preference Survey |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Most airport access models treat driving as one mode, without distinguishing the difference between driving with a rental car or a driver-owned car. The airport access model driving with a rental car as a separate mode with different attributes from the drive and park mode. |
Section 5.7 | Fixed-Route Package and Mail Delivery (1) |
2. Title | GoodTrip a New Approach for Modeling and Evaluation of Urban Goods Distribution |
3. Author | BOERKAMPS-J (Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands); BINSBERGEN -VAN-A (The Netherlands Research School for Transport, Infrastructure and Logistics, the Netherlands) |
4. Year of Study | 2000 |
5. Source | URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS. PROCEEDINGS FROM THE 2ND KFB RESEARCH CONFERENCE IN LUND, SWEDEN, 7-8 JUNE, 1999 (BULLETIN 187). 2000. (187:01) pp. 229-39 |
6. Objective/Purpose | This paper describes the GoodTrip model that estimates goods flows, urban freight traffic, and its impacts. It is from overseas but with relevant methodology. |
7. General/Literature Review | This paper discusses the theory and application of the model, which is based on logistical chains. Livability and accessibility of urban areas are influenced by freight traffic resulting from logistical choices in the supply chain, like warehouse location, delivery frequencies, and vehicle type and routing. To support decision-making it is necessary to model these choices and their effects, in current and future situations. GoodTrip is a tool to evaluate different concepts of freight distribution from both a societal as economical viewpoint, by using geographical, economical, and logistical data. Model output discriminates clearly between different alternative freight distribution concepts. The modeling results comply with empirical data and real life experience. |
8. Location/methods/models | Overseas including a case study for the City of Groninger. In GoodTrip the logistical chain links activities of consumers, supermarkets, hypermarkets, distribution centers and producers. Based on consumer demand, the GoodTrip model calculates the volume per goods type in meters cubed in every zone. The goods flows in the logistical chain are determined by the spatial distribution of activities and the market shares of each activity type - consumer, supermarket, hypermarket, distribution center, etc. This attraction constraint calculation starts with consumers and ends at the producers or at the city borders. A vehicle-loading algorithm then assigns the goods flows to vehicles. A shortest route algorithm assigns all tours of each transportation mode to the corresponding infrastructure networks. These results in logistical indicators, vehicle mileage, network loads, emissions and finally energy use of urban freight distribution. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This is an overseas paper but with a methodology that may be of interest. |
Section 5.7 | Fixed-Route Package and Mail Delivery (2) |
2. Title | Postal and Delivery Services Delivering on Competition |
3. Author | Edited by: Michael A. Crew, Graduate School of Management, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA Paul R. Kleindorfer The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | Book Series: Topics In Regulatory Economics And Policy, Volume 44 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston |
6. Objective/Purpose | This is a book covering different aspects of postal and delivery services including a chapter on demand analysis in postal services. |
7. General/Literature Review | This is an indispensable source of information and analysis on the current state of the postal and delivery sector. It offers current insight into strategy, regulation as well as the economics of this sector. Issues addressed include international postal policy, the universal service obligation, regulation, competition, entry, the role of scale and scope economies, the nature and role of cost and demand analysis in postal service, productivity, interaction of law and economics, human resources, transition and reform issues. |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Center for Research in Regulated Industries' (CRRI) 10th Conference on Postal and Delivery Economics held in Potsdam, Germany on June 5-8, 2002 and this book is based on the Conference proceedings. This book might include important statistics on package delivery. |
Section 5.7 | Fixed-Route Package and Mail Delivery (3) |
2. Title | The Parcel Service Industry in the U.S.: Its Size and Role in Commerce |
3. Author | Morlok-EK; Nitzberg-BF; Balasubramaniamm-K; Sand-ML |
4. Year of Study | 2000 |
5. Source | University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Mid-Atlantic Universities, Transportation Center; Pennsylvania State University, Research Office Building, University Park, PA, 16802-4710, USA |
6. Objective/Purpose | This report provides an overview of parcel service industry and its importance to United States commerce. |
7. General/Literature Review | This report looks at the revenues and goods delivered by the different major delivery companies in the United States. In 1997, the four carriers that account for well over 90% of the United States parcel activity - Airborne, Federal Express (FedEx), United Parcel Service (UPS), and the U.S. Postal Service - had $37.9 billion in transportation revenue. This exceeded the domestic transportation revenue of all major freight modes except trucking. Another way of looking at the size of the parcel industry is to examine the goods it delivers. In the BTS' 1977 Commodity Flow Survey, only 3.2% of the value of goods shipped went via parcel carriers. But by the latest survey, in 1997, that percentage had grown to 12.3%. The authors believe there are fundamentally two reasons why parcel service has become so important in recent years. One consists of changes in the way goods and services are produced and distributed in our economy - globalization, customized mass production, lean inventory management, rapid customer response, and growth in e commerce, among others. The other is parcel service itself, which is at the vanguard of transportation service modernization with such features as differentiated time-definite service options, intermodal service, in-transit visibility, and data integration with the management systems of customers. Thus parcel service is a major element of the transportation infrastructure of the nation. It is essential for modern commerce. And current trends suggest that parcel service will assume an even more significant role in the future. |
8. Location/methods/models | The whole country |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | The paper provides statistics about the delivery industry. May be helpful to describe the size of the industry. |
Section 5.8 | Urban Freight Distribution (1) |
2. Title | Valuing Long-Haul and Freight Travel Time Reliability |
3. Author | Wigan, M., N. Rockliffe, T. Thoresen and D. Tsolakis, Oxford Systematics, Monash University, Australia |
4. Year of Study | 1999 |
5. Source | |
6. Objective/Purpose | To estimate value of time spent in transit for individual items or loads of freight |
7. General/Literature Review | Delays during transit time - loading goods into trucks from warehouses. Valuation of time lost at transit is important to shippers and receivers which otherwise is not included in the vehicle operating costs and person travel times. Paper-based on contextual stated preference methods and MNL models used to estimate the value of such factors from an Australian survey of freight shippers in 1998. |
8. Location/methods/models | 1998 Data from survey of freight shippers in Australia; stated preference survey methods; multinomial logit models to estimate value of time. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Three freight market segments - (a) intercapital freight truck load (FTL) (b) metropolitan FTL (c) metropolitan multi-drop. |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | Australian freight shippers |
13. Level of temporal detail | Annual figures |
14. Data sources | Stated preference data derived from freight shippers |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Importance of valuation of time spent in transit at warehouses. Provides benefits in evaluating accurate freight travel times. |
Section 5.8 | Urban Freight Distribution (2) |
2. Title | Air Cargo World Online - Commonwealth Business Media Publication |
3. Author | Air Cargo World, Washington, D.C. |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | http://www.aircargoworld.com/directories/ |
6. Objective/Purpose | |
7. General/Literature Review | Provides information of airports across the world for the year 2001 Has information on almost all airports in the USA Information on air cargo in terms of freight tonnage, size of airport warehouses, air cargo traffic Number of carriers and proximity to other modes like rail, road, water |
8. Location/methods/models | All airports across USA |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Size of warehouses at all airports in the USA (square feet) Cargo space (acres, square feet) Number of air service carriers Traffic and tonnage (tons) Number of aircraft movements Availability of foreign trade zone, special services/facilities, U.S. Customs Distance (in miles) to connecting transportation modes – rail terminal, ocean port, interstate highway, truck terminal |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | All USA |
13. Level of temporal detail | 2001 Annual figures |
14. Data sources | Air Cargo freight data at airport warehouses |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | Airports across USA |
17. Importance to our study | Freight tonnage at all airport warehouses will be useful to derive truck traffic to and from airports. Size of warehouses also useful to estimate warehouse truck traffic. |
Section 5.8 | Urban Freight Distribution (3) |
2. Title | Freight Impacts on Ohio's Roadways - Final Report |
3. Author | Cambridge Systematics Inc. |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | http://www.dot.state.oh.us/planning/Freight/FreightImpacts.htm |
6. Objective/Purpose | Provide Ohio DOT with a clear picture of existing and future freight movements on Ohio's macro-highway corridors. Assess the impact that future changes in the freight system and freight movement may have on Ohio's roadways. |
7. General/Literature Review | Ohio statewide transportation plan - Access Ohio. Development of a comprehensive, statewide, travel demand forecasting model, which includes a sophisticated freight-planning capabilities. |
8. Location/methods/models | State of Ohio |
9. Type of vehicle or service | All truck types by weight |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Truck flows in tons from, to and through the state of Ohio. Truck flows in tons from and to warehouses in Ohio. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | Distribution of truck flows and truck ton flows - inbound, outbound and internally in Ohio. Origins and destinations of all truck trips in Ohio. |
12. Level of spatial detail | Freight flows that originate, end and go through the state of Ohio |
13. Level of temporal detail | Daily and annual truck flows in the year 2000 |
14. Data sources | 2000 Reebie TRANSEARCH county-to-county commodity flow database |
15. If forecasts are included | 2010 and 2020 commodity flow forecasts included |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Freight tonnage at warehouses will be useful to derive truck traffic. Number of truck trips by weight at warehouses. |
Section 5.9 | On-Demand Package Delivery (1) |
2. Title | Technology and Transportation - The Dynamic Relationship |
3. Author | Niles, J., Discovery Institute, Seattle, WA |
4. Year of Study | 2001 |
5. Source | http://www.discovery.org/articleFiles/PDFs/NilesTelecomReport.pdf |
6. Objective/Purpose | Impact of telecom on transportation, including travel substitution, travel stimulation, and travel modification. Survey and analysis of how telecom affects movement of people and goods. |
7. General/Literature Review | Report discusses how telecom tends to modify the location of homes, businesses, and other generators of activity in the Cascadia corridor (British Columbia, Washington and Oregon). |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | United States Internet users and consumer goods purchased online from 1996 to 2002. Percentage of total households who used the Internet for shopping. Consumer goods purchased in millions ($$). |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | All USA |
12. Level of spatial detail | Annual figures |
13. Level of temporal detail | Forecasts of Internet users for 2001 and 2002. Forecasts of consumer goods purchased online in 2001 and 2002 (in millions of dollars). |
14. Data sources | Internet-based companies |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Report discusses more about the impacts of telecom on travel and movement of goods. Discusses the advantages of telecommuting and its effect on transportation. Only statistic relevant to our study is 'United States Internet users and consumer goods purchased online from 1996 to 2002.' |
Section 5.9 | On-Demand Package Delivery (2) |
2. Title | Dot-Coms and Productivity in the Internet Economy |
3. Author | Whinston, A., A. Barua, J. Shutter, G. Wilson and J. Pinnell, University of Texas Research Team, Austin, TX |
4. Year of Study | 2001 |
5. Source | SITE NOT WORKING http://www.internetindicators.com/prod_rept.html |
6. Objective/Purpose | Investigating the Internet economy indicators - the dot-com companies and their productivity |
7. General/Literature Review | Two types of dot-com companies identified - digital and physical. Digital dot-coms are Internet-based companies such as Yahoo, EBay and America Online. Physical dot-coms sell physical products such as books, CDs, toys, etc., that are shipped to consumers. |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Average revenue ($$) in 1998 and 1999. Average number of employees and revenue per employee in 1998 and 1999. Average gross income ($$) and gross profit margin (%) in 1998 and 1999. Comparative statistics of above mentioned variables across publicly traded digital and physical dot-coms. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | All USA |
13. Level of temporal detail | Annual figures |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | Forecasts of Internet users for 2001 and 2002 Forecasts of consumer goods purchased online in 2001 and 2002 (in millions of dollars) |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | Internet-based companies |
17. Importance to our study | Statistics relevant to our study are average annual revenues ($$) of dot-coms, number of employees and revenue per employee in 1998 and 1999 across the United States. |
Section 5.9 | On-Demand Package Delivery (3) |
2. Title | The Challenge of E-Logistics |
3. Author | Jardine Logistics Group |
4. Year of Study | 2001 |
5. Source | http://www.info.gov.hk/digital21/ eng/milestone/download/fiec_jardine.pdf |
6. Objective/Purpose | Investigating the growth of e-commerce in the future |
7. General/Literature Review | E-commerce overview B2B B2C Impact of e-commerce by industry type |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | B2C e-Tailing revenue in 1999 ($$) Number of shipping packages in 2000 B2B revenue statistics - 1998 to 2004 B2B commerce conducted over the Internet by industry category |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | All USA |
13. Level of temporal detail | Annual figures |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | B2C revenue in 2004 ($$) Residential package delivery in 2003 |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | Internet-based companies |
17. Importance to our study | Revenue statistics of B2C and B2B e-commerce conducted over the Internet in the United States |
Section 5.9 | On-Demand Package Delivery (4) |
2. Title | Retail E-Commerce Sales in Third Quarter 2002 Were $11.1 Billion, up 34.3 Percent from Third Quarter 2001, Census Bureau Reports |
3. Author | Scheleur, S. and C. King, Unites States Department of Commerce, NEWS, Washington, D.C. |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/ecom.pdf |
6. Objective/Purpose | Monthly retail trade and food services - service sector statistics, U.S. Census Bureau |
7. General/Literature Review | Quarterly reports on United States retail e commerce sales in billions of dollars Monthly Retail Trade Survey (MRTS) |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Retail e-commerce sales estimates for 1999 to 2002 by quarter |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | All USA |
13. Level of temporal detail | Quarterly figures |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | Retail trade only |
17. Importance to our study | Revenue statistics of retail e-commerce industry in the United States |
Section 5.9 | On-Demand Package Delivery (5) |
2. Title | Measuring the Electronic Economy, E-Stats, U.S. Census Bureau |
3. Author | U.S. Census Bureau |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | https://www.census.gov/econ/estats/papers/3.pdf |
6. Objective/Purpose | Providing information on a quarterly basis about e-commerce in the United States |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | United States Manufacturing - Total and E commerce value of shipments ($$) for 1999 and 2000 United States Merchant Wholesale Trade - Total and E commerce sales ($$) for 1999 and 2000 United States Merchant Wholesale Trade - Total, E commerce and EDI (electronic data interchange) Sales ($$) for 2000 United States Selected Service Industries - Total, E commerce Revenue ($$) for 1999 and 2000 United States Retail Trade - Total and E commerce Sales ($$) for 1999 and 2000 United States Electronic Shopping and Mail-order Houses - Total and E commerce Sales by Merchandise Line for 1999 and 2000 |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | All USA |
13. Level of temporal detail | Quarterly and annual statistics |
14. Data sources | 2000 Annual Survey of Manufactures 2000 Annual Trade Survey 2000 Service Annual Survey 2000 Annual Retail Survey |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | Retail, wholesale, service industries |
17. Importance to our study | Revenue statistics of retail, wholesale and service e-commerce industry in the United States |
Section 5.10 | Construction Transport (1) |
2. Title | Number of Contracts, Value of Contracts Awarded |
3. Author | Economics and Research, American Road and Transportation Builders Association |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | http://www.artba.org/economics_research/ recent_statistics/by_the_numbers/by_the_numbers.htm |
6. Objective/Purpose | |
7. General/Literature Review | Transportation Construction By the Numbers - Monthly report as featured in ARTBA's Transportation Builder Magazine; highlights price trends, employment data and contract awards for the transportation construction industry. |
8. Location/methods/models | |
9. Type of vehicle or service | |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Value ($$) of construction contracts awarded by State and Facility (airport, bridges and tunnels, docks, piers and wharves, highways and railways). Number of contracts awarded by Facility. Number of contracts awarded by State. Transportation construction contractor employment by facility type. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | State-level data |
13. Level of temporal detail | Monthly reports |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | All facilities |
17. Importance to our study | From the value and number of contracts by facility and State and from construction employment, construction equipment transporters tonnage can be computed using factors. |
Section 5.10 | Construction Transport (2) |
2. Title | Farad Diversion Dam Replacement Project, Environmental Impact Report |
3. Author | State Water Resources Control Board, California |
4. Year of Study | 2002 |
5. Source | http://www.waterrights.ca.gov/ |
6. Objective/Purpose | To provide environmental and regulatory background necessary to analyze traffic issues To evaluate potential traffic impacts associated with project construction |
7. General/Literature Review | Construction vehicle trip generation - workforce and construction equipment |
8. Location/methods/models | 2002 data from an environmental impact report (EIR) on a construction project in Sacramento, California |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Heavy trucks - used in transporting construction equipment and materials |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Average daily workforce. Average daily vehicle trips - construction workers and heavy trucks. Daily peak-hour vehicle trips - transporting workforce and equipment and material deliveries. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | Confined to the project area |
13. Level of temporal detail | Daily vehicle trips |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | Construction equipment and material deliveries in an urban area construction worksite. |
Section 5.11 | Public Utilities Services (1) |
2. Title | Routing Public Service Vehicles |
3. Author | Marks, DH; Stricker, R |
4. Year of Study | 1971 |
5. Source | ASCE Journal of the Urban Plan and Develop Div, Vol. 97, No. UP2, PROC PAPER 8573, pp. 165 178 |
6. Objective/Purpose | An overview of the problem arising in planning such services as trash collection, snow plowing, and street cleaning. |
7. General/Literature Review | An analysis is made of the trash collection and snow plowing problems for the city of Cambridge, MA. And differences between the real world problems and the theoretical model are explored. A brief description is given of several existing algorithms used to solve vehicle routing problems. A literature review and description of available methods is presented. A sample routing problems for the city of Cambridge is worked using an algorithm. |
8. Location/methods/models | Cambridge, MA |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Trash collection, snow plowing |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This is again a more methodology paper, however it is on the applied side of the methodological papers. I do not have the source yet, but I doubt how helpful it will be. |
Section 5.12 | Public Safety Services (1) |
2. Title | Evaluation of the Service Patrol Program in the Puget Sound Region |
3. Author | Jennifer Nee and Mark E. Hallenbeck, Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC), University of Washington, Seattle |
4. Year of Study | August 2000 to January 2001 |
5. Source | Washington State DOT and U.S. DOT, FHWA Research Project T1803, Task 37 http://199.79.179.82/sundev/detail.cfm? ANNUMBER=00921453&STARTROW=1&CFID=87145&CFTOKEN=15535947 |
6. Objective/Purpose | In 1998, the Washington State Service Patrol Study Steering Committee provided additional towing services to improve incident removal from the most congested sections of Puget Sound area freeways. The primary goal of a Service Patrol is to provide quick response to incidents and clear roadways as rapidly as possible in high-volume areas during peak traffic volumes. The committee also recommended an evaluation of the system to determine and compare the effectiveness of the service modes, specifically, the Washington State Patrol, contracted tow operators, WSDOT tow trucks operated on the floating bridges, and privately sponsored motor assistance vehicles such as that of the AAA. The purpose of this report is to examine different methods of service delivery and to provide lessons learned for future implementation. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | I 5, I 90 and SR 520, I 405 in Seattle, SR 16 and I 5 in Tacoma |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Tow Trucks |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | During the six months study period, 5,000 Service Patrol assists or contacts occurred on the patrolled segments on I 5, I 405, SR 16, floating bridge on I 90 and SR 520. The types of incident data included are:
|
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | Distribution of vehicles are available from the survey data as shown above. |
12. Level of spatial detail | Seattle urban area |
13. Level of temporal detail | Six months from August, 2000 - January, 2001 |
14. Data sources | 5,000 tow truck calls survey data |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | No |
17. Importance to our study | Although the study is not directly related to our objective, this study did a detailed survey of the tow trucks request call and these survey data might be helpful to our study. |
Section 5.12 | Public Safety Services (2) |
2. Title | Location, Dispatching, and Routing Models for Emergency Service with Stochastic Travel Times |
3. Author | Mark S. Daskin, Northwestern University |
4. Year of Study | 1984 |
5. Source | UC, BERKELEY, INSTITUTE FOR TRANSPORTATION STUDIES 15071957 http://199.79.179.82/sundev/detail.cfm?ANNUMBER=00419626&STARTROW=11&CFID=87145&CFTOKEN=15535947 |
6. Objective/Purpose | This article formulates a multi-objective model that simultaneously determines the number of vehicles to deploy and their locations and identifies the appropriate dispatch policy and the routes vehicles should use in traveling to emergency locations. |
7. General/Literature Review | Urban governments are primarily responsible for providing emergency services, which includes emergency medical services, fire, and police protection. In all three cases, performance is often rated along two dimensions: 1) speed with which the system can response to emergencies, and 2) the ability of the responding personnel to handle the situation once they arrive on the scene. This paper was concern with response time and with means of reducing it. |
8. Location/methods/models | A multi-vehicle response-time model with stochastic travel times was developed. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Emergency vehicles, Ambulances |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | No data available |
15. If forecasts are included | Model can be used for the future year demand estimates |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | Emergency locations, for example, accident locations |
17. Importance to our study | This articles developed a theoretical model to assign emergency vehicles on the routes. It does not include any survey, however it does include a 21-node network for testing the model. |
Section 5.12 | Public Safety Services (3) |
2. Title | Projecting Police Traffic Enforcement Workload: An Empirical Analysis |
3. Author | Richard A. Raub, Illinois State Police |
4. Year of Study | 1987 |
5. Source | Transportation Quarterly, Volume 42, Issue 2, 04/00/1988 |
6. Objective/Purpose | A study is reported that has found that police can estimate the number of officers required for traffic services using external sources. Historical data are not required. A clear relationship has been shown to exist between independent and dependent variables. This analysis showed very strong relationships between historic workload and independent variables such as volume of traffic and rural population. Workload is defined as the number of hours spent annually on police services. Included in the workload is traffic enforcement, motorist assistance, removal of abandoned vehicles, and traffic control. Volume is measured by vehicle miles. Rural population is the number of persons living outside incorporated municipalities. As traffic increases, there is more opportunity for traffic services. More violations will be seen during a given period; more motorists will require assistance. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Illinois Regression equation was developed which estimates annual hours spent policing as follows:
Where:
|
9. Type of vehicle or service | Police Vehicle |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | Total vehicles |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | VMT |
12. Level of spatial detail | Illinois State |
13. Level of temporal detail | 1985 to 1986 |
14. Data sources | Number of incidents by type and time required to handle, Illinois State Police department |
15. If forecasts are included | No |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | No |
17. Importance to our study | This paper estimates time in hours annually spent policing and VMT for policing. This regression equation might be useful for our study. This analysis showed very strong relationships between historic workload and independent variables such as volume of traffic and rural population. Workload is defined as the number of hours spent annually on police services. Included in the workload is traffic enforcement, motorist assistance, removal of abandoned vehicles, and traffic control. Volume is measured by vehicle miles. |
Section 5.13 | Trades and Services (1) |
2. Title | The Redesign of Sears Carry-in Repair Network |
3. Author | M. Docherty, President, itoi logistics Inc,. M. Good, President, Product Repair Services, J. Perl, Director, Innovative Logistics Solutions, Inc., and L.M. Scovell, Executive Vice President, itoi logistics Inc. |
4. Year of Study | 1999 |
5. Source | 2001 Annual Conference Proceedings, Council of Logistics Management 2001 Annual Conference. |
6. Objective/Purpose | This paper discusses the redesign of Sears and Roebucks and Company's Product Repair Services. It covers the approach to the design, data collection and analysis, network optimization, the integrated network strategy, shuttle routes and schedules, discrete simulation modeling, and the design's implementation. |
7. General/Literature Review | Sears' Product Repair Service and Sears Logistics Service department hired outside consultant AMEC to form a project team with its internal resources for the redesign of the carry-in repair network. Network optimization program SAILS (Strategic Analysis of Integrated Logistics Systems) was applied for this work. SAILS uses a mixed integer linear program approach, specifically designed to solve large-scale multi-echelon network optimization problems. The echelons are: Repair facilities, Repair facilities warehouses, Cross-Dock facilities, and Access points. |
8. Location/methods/models | Nationwide |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Sears' repair trucks |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | N/A in the paper, but they talked about the demand estimates. So, information might be available in the original report. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | N/A in the paper, but they talked about the demand estimates. So, information might be available in the original report. |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | Sears maintains cost and operational data for their products. Authors of this article collected and cleaned these data for analysis. They used GIS to virtualize the spatial distribution of data on product demand, unit repair and unit transport costs. |
15. If forecasts are included | Yes |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | Repair centers |
17. Importance to our study | If we can collect the original report and the data they have used, we can do further analysis and use the same technique for other products. |
Section 5.13 | Trades and Services (2) |
2. Title | Efficient Routing of Service Vehicles |
3. Author | Gendreau, M.; Laporte, G., Yelle SY. Montreal University, Canada |
4. Year of Study | 1995 |
5. Source | Montreal University, P.O. Box 6128, Station A, Montreal, Canada |
6. Objective/Purpose | GeoRoute is an arc routing Software package that includes a route optimization module based on the GENIUS traveling salesman problem heuristic. The territory under study is represented by a directed graph in which arcs correspond to streets. The system also introduces artificial arcs to account for street crossings, street changes, and turns. This report describes experiments performed using GeoRoute to determine optimal routes for garbage collection and for snow plowing operations on 30 street networks. The experiments tested various values of penalties in order to arrive at conventional packages of penalties for use in various situations. The results help GeoRoute users select sets of penalties without having to ponder a large set of possible parameters. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Montreal, Canada GeoRoute is a routing software and USPS and many other companies use this package for their traveling salesman optimization. The author applied the software and uses different costs/penalties to optimize a 30 street network. As a case study he determined optimum routes for GARBAGE COLLECTION and SNOW PLOWING OPERATIONS. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Garbage collection and Snow Plowing Trucks |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | N/A |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | N/A |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This article discussed about the application of GeoRoute software package for optimizing traveling salesman problem. The author uses different costs/penalties for links and intersections to determine optimum routes for garbage collection and for snow plowing operations. |
Section 5.13 | Trades and Services (3) |
2. Title | Computer-Based Routing and Scheduling in Metropolitan Regions |
3. Author | George R. Beetle, President, George Beetle Company, 533 Arbutus St., Philadelphia, PA 19119 |
4. Year of Study | 1988/1989 |
5. Source | ASCE-Journal of Transportation Engineering |
6. Objective/Purpose | The purpose of this paper is to describe the computer-based methods to improve the management of daily movements of vehicles and crews in regional service activities. Data requirements and the need to account for traffic volumes in routing decisions are elaborated. A set of 12 application programs written for use by schedulers, dispatchers, or operating managers is used as a point of reference in the discussion. A case history illustration taken from collection operations in regional banking is also recounted. |
7. General/Literature Review | Computer software and its application by a major commercial banking institution in Philadelphia have been presented as a case study. At that time the bank deployed a total of some 200 automatic teller machines and the crews of the bank had to visit all the machines everyday. Twelve application programs were written over a period of four months and installed in the bank's offices. Traffic were assigned to the highway network which consists of nodes and links. |
8. Location/methods/models | Philadelphia |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Salesman's vehicle |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | N/A |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | N/A |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | This is a theoretical article and discussed about the problems faced by schedulers, dispatchers, or operating managers during traffic congestion, weather, highway accidents. They discussed about a software program that considers all these problems and reroutes vehicles. |
Section 5.14 | Outside Sales and Services (1) |
2. Title | Defining the MTA Role in Coordinating Community-Based Service in Los Angeles County |
3. Author | Jim McLaughlin and Scott Greene, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA |
4. Year of Study | 1999-2000 |
5. Source | Information Center Manager American Public Transportation Association 1666 K St. NW 11th Floor/Washington, D.C. 20006 202 496 4807 (phone) 202 496 4326 (fax) jolivetti@apta.com |
6. Objective/Purpose | This paper concentrates on the MTA role in coordinating health and human services transportation for incorporation into the county-wide transit master plan begun as part of the long-range transportation plan process. The public transport elements of the long-range plan envisions multiple tiers of service, including commuter, heavy and light rail, bus rapid transit, and other buses operating on high-demand corridors, traditional inter- and intra-jurisdictional local services, and Community-Based Transportation Services (CBTS). The transit master plan will address policies to improve coordination of CBTS with specific implementation potentially guided by five-year business plans. |
7. General/Literature Review | The Transportation and Human Services Executive Council approved development of a strategic plan for coordinating public transportation and health and human services transportation, including examining existing programs. MTA and Access Services, Inc. (ASI) estimated that 1,300 dedicated vehicles and 1,400 taxis are operated within the County by 200 public and non-profit organizations, funded for specific client populations by health and human services organizations. |
8. Location/methods/models | Los Angeles County |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Social Service Vehicles |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | A listing of 30 public transportation programs are shown in the article. Table includes passenger trips, average trip length, and operating costs. For financial year 1999 there are total 4,204,270 trips, 6.8 miles trip length, and operating costs equal $62,300,868. |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | Los Angeles County MTA |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | |
Section 5.14 | Outside Sales and Services (2) |
2. Title | Service and Supply Trips at Federal Institutions in Washington, D.C., Area |
3. Author | Spielberg, F; Smith, SA |
4. Year of Study | 1981 (?) |
5. Source | Transportation Research Record No. 834, pp. 15 20, 1981 |
6. Objective/Purpose | Federal office buildings in Washington, D.C., are typical of many large office complexes, particularly those of state governments. Federal warehouse operations have characteristics similar to those of large distribution centers. The results of a survey of goods and service vehicle trips to federal facilities in the Washington metropolitan area are presented and suggest specific guidelines for the planning and operation of similar facilities. Data were collected on vehicle trips that involved a service or supply function at 10 federal facilities in the Washington area. By using a combination of onsite observation and driver interviews, data on arrival and departure times, vehicle characteristics, trip purpose, origin of trip, and nature and size of load were obtained, analyzed, and used to develop planning guidelines (Authors). |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Washington, D.C. |
9. Type of vehicle or service | Service and supply vehicles |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study | |
Section 5.14 | Outside Sales and Services (3) |
2. Title | The Development of an Urban Commercial Vehicles Travel Model and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Emissions Model for the Atlanta Region |
3. Author | Thorntorn, M., R. Guensler, and O. Schropp |
4. Year of Study | 1998 |
5. Source | Published in CD-ROM of the Proceedings of the 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board; Washington, D.C., January 2002 |
6. Objective/Purpose | The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the development of a commercial vehicles travel model set up for ARC, the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Atlantic Region, and the Georgia Tech emissions model. The development of the Atlanta commercial vehicle and truck model set was divided into three basic phases. The data collection phase which identifies data elements and formulation of a survey instrument. The data collection phase which identifies data elements and formulation of a survey instrument. The second phase consisted of the development of the truck trip generation and the trip distribution models. The final phase is the integrated heavy-duty vehicle emissions module. |
7. General/Literature Review | The commercial vehicle survey was conducted by NuStats International for the ARC in the spring of 1996. Participating businesses were assigned a travel day. Drivers were asked to record all trips made for the specific 24-hour period. In total 347 firms of the 814 eligible firms contacted, were recruited to participate in the study. Of the 814 eligible firms, 152 firms (19%) provided completed trip logs. |
8. Location/methods/models | Atlanta |
9. Type of vehicle or service | All types of commercial vehicles |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | Data were used to develop four-step travel demand model |
12. Level of spatial detail | Atlanta region including the following counties: Clayton, Cherokee, Cobb, Dekalb, Douglas, Foyette, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Rockdale, and Atlanta. |
13. Level of temporal detail | 1996 |
14. Data sources | The CV survey was accomplished through a survey of business that operate commercial vehicles. This survey was conducted in 1996 and might be available from Atlanta Regional Commission. |
15. If forecasts are included | Yes, the data have been used in the forecasting model |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | No |
17. Importance to our study | The survey form includes purpose of trips, which includes 1) Delivery, 2) Pick-up, 3) Maintenance, 4) work-related, 6) Driver needed, 7) Return to base, 7) Other. |
Section 5.14 | Others |
2. Title | 1995 National Personal Transportation Survey |
3. Author | FHWA |
4. Year of Study | 1995-1996 |
5. Source | http://npts.ornl.gov/npts/1995/Doc/publications.shtml |
6. Objective/Purpose | Trip purpose coded in the NTPS survey are:
Trip Modes Coded: Automobile, Van, Sport utility vehicle, Pickup truck, Other truck, RV (recreational vehicle), Motorcycle, Other POV, Bus, Amtrak, Commuter train, Streetcar/trolley, Subway/elevated rail, Airplane, Taxicab, Bicycle, Walk, School bus, Other non POV, Legitimate skip, Not ascertained. |
7. General/Literature Review | |
8. Location/methods/models | Nationwide |
9. Type of vehicle or service | All |
10. Magnitude of vehicles/trip rates | |
11. Distribution of vehicles/trip length/VMT | |
12. Level of spatial detail | |
13. Level of temporal detail | |
14. Data sources | |
15. If forecasts are included | |
16. Facility-specific (airport, seaport) | |
17. Importance to our study |