An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways - Appendix B

Appendix B

Figure B.1 Steep-Grade Bottlenecks on Freeways Used As Intercity Truck Corridors
HPMS Sample Sections Only

Table B.1 Top 25 Steep-Grade Bottlenecks on Freeways Used As Intercity Truck Corridors
*HPMS Sample Sections Only*
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	All Vehicles-2004	All Trucks-2004
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	AADT	AADTT	Percent of All Vehicles	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks (Expanded)
5	Kern, California	8	66,763	22,032	33%	1,119,438	1,272,800
15	San Bernardino, California	8	122,751	22,095	18%	1,049,160	1,403,777
10	Riverside, California	4	22,279	8,689	39%	466,219	699,328
IS81	Montgomery, Virginia	4	44,039	14,092	32%	456,645	2,141,666
77	Mercer, West Virginia	4	31,051	6,521	21%	414,253	433,723
IS81	Smyth, Virginia	4	32,174	8,365	26%	352,215	1,357,789
5	Jackson, Oregon	4	16,345	6,701	41%	342,763	342,763
5	Josephine, Oregon	4	20,767	7,061	34%	314,310	314,310
5	Siskiyou, California	4	15,234	4,875	32%	267,495	299,326
40	St. Francis, Arkansas	4	31,716	14,589	46%	260,546	876,997
8	San Diego, California	4	21,009	4,202	20%	252,015	378,022
84	Umatilla, Oregon	4	10,144	4,058	40%	247,521	247,521
84	Malheur, Oregon	4	8,543	4,015	47%	242,338	242,338
5	Josephine, Oregon	4	20,231	7,890	39%	238,749	238,749
77	Raleigh, West Virginia	4	42,029	8,826	21%	227,184	234,681
40	Guilford, North Carolina	8	82,904	15,752	19%	221,883	777,257
5	Douglas, Oregon	4	19,857	6,751	34%	214,815	214,815
5	Marion, Oregon	4	64,150	13,472	21%	214,408	214,408
64	Crawford, Indiana	4	17,430	5,229	30%	203,965	271,681
30	Hempstead, Arkansas	4	23,030	10,594	46%	191,543	964,992
5	Jackson, Oregon	4	15,300	6,273	41%	186,236	186,236
64	Carter, Kentucky	4	15,098	4,529	30%	179,446	179,446
95	Northampton, North Carolina	4	36,071	6,853	19%	168,934	258,130
77	Kanawha, West Virginia	4	32,315	6,786	21%	163,371	172,683
40	Torrance, New Mexico	4	15,448	6,179	40%	161,660	495,488

Figure B.2 Steep-Grade Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Intercity Truck Corridors Used As Urban Truck Corridors
HPMS Sample Sections Only

Table B.2 Top 25 Steep-Grade Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Intercity Truck Corridors
*HPMS Sample Sections Only*
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	All Vehicles-2004	All Trucks-2004
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	AADT	AADTT	Percent of All Vehicles	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks (Expanded)
58	Kern, California	4	20,813	6,868	33%	334,820	758,033
131	Kent, Mississippi	4	42,604	5,112	12%	191,106	445,851
18	San Bernardino, California	2	10,757	1,936	18%	169,939	855,813
58	Kern, California	4	21,961	7,247	33%	146,081	330,726
101	Santa Barbara, California	4	30,027	3,904	13%	134,025	303,433
17	Santa Clara, California	4	63,616	2,545	4%	128,589	143,891
17	Santa Cruz, California	4	63,654	3,183	5%	114,915	128,589
U.S. 220	Franklin, Virginia	4	15,365	2,458	16%	104,076	726,033
299	Shasta, California	2	4,084	1,266	31%	85,000	194,650
223	Lenawee, Mississippi	2	10,227	1,841	18%	84,656	364,866
23	Madison, North Carolina	2	8,419	1,179	14%	81,267	149,693
15	Perry, Kentucky	2	11,029	1,654	15%	79,887	158,976
31	Miami, Indiana	4	21,874	3,937	18%	74,565	195,285
74	Cleveland, North Carolina	4	26,261	3,677	14%	68,099	226,632
31	Berrien, Mississippi	2	20,001	1,600	8%	61,697	404,609
80	Floyd, Kentucky	4	14,454	1,734	12%	58,703	116,819
U.S. 220	Henry, Virginia	4	17,823	3,030	17%	57,441	422,710
19	Haywood, North Carolina	2	10,100	1,010	10%	55,453	546,157
U.S. 30	Bannock, Idaho	4	5,102	1,429	28%	53,570	104,782
50	El Dorado, California	4	26,577	1,860	7%	53,480	121,080
154	Santa Barbara, California	2	14,140	1,131	8%	52,873	266,266
23	Macon, North Carolina	4	23,231	3,252	14%	52,222	173,794
25E	Bell, Kentucky	4	20,446	2,045	10%	50,443	88,276
89	Siskiyou, California	2	2,254	766	34%	49,531	113,425
U.S. 58	Halifax, Virginia	4	9,069	1,723	19%	49,200	162,853

Figure B.3 Steep-Grade Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Urban Truck Corridors
HPMS Sample Sections Only

Table B.3 Steep-Grade Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Urban Truck Corridors
*HPMS Sample Sections Only*
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	All Vehicles-2004	All Trucks-2004
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	AADT	AADTT	Percent of All Vehicles	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks (Expanded)
280	Shelby, Alabama	4	51,411	5,141	10%	177,156	415,961
1	Aiken, South Carolina	4	20,889	2,298	11%	72,395	95,199
14	Los Angeles, California	4	20,115	1,006	5%	27,184	476,319
74	Riverside, California	4	20,269	1,419	7%	23,025	28,666
100	St. Louis, Missouri	4	25,265	1,516	6%	16,609	233,485
CR 948	12086	6	19,371	969	5%	16,567	34,178
21	Jefferson, Missouri	4	17,830	1,070	6%	14,992	153,311
78	Jackson, Missouri	4	24,869	1,492	6%	13,227	44,945
60	Boyd, Kentucky	4	25,559	1,022	4%	8,608	9,443
SR 43	Jefferson, Ohio	4	20,322	813	4%	7,317	7,485
431	Madison, Alabama	4	20,687	414	2%	5,064	10,006

Figure B.4 Steep-Grade Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Truck Access Routes
HPMS Sample Sections Only

Table B.4 Steep-Grade Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Truck Access Routes
*HPMS Sample Sections Only*
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	All Vehicles-2004	All Trucks-2004
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	AADT	AADTT	Percent of All Vehicles	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks (Expanded)
-	Fresno, California	4	35,858	3,227	9%	42,064	276,610
-	Ventura, California	4	36,728	1,102	3%	13,043	13,043
-	Fresno, California	4	15,118	454	3%	5,517	13,257