U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
![]() |
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information |
|
Publication Number: FHWA-RD-03-031 Date: JUNE 2003 |
This appendix provides instructions, data sheets, and distress maps for use in visual surveys for the collection of distress information for ACP, JCP, and CRCP surfaces. Visual distress survey procedures have been used in the LTPP program as the primary distress data collection method since 1995. The Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program is the basis for all distress surveys performed for the LTPP.
During the visual distress survey, safety is the first consideration, as with all field data collection activities. All raters must adhere to the practices and authority of the State or Canadian Province.
The following equipment is necessary for performing field distress surveys of any pavement surface type.
The distress maps show the exact location of each distress type existing on the test section. The distress types and severity levels should be identified by using the Distress Identification Manual. A total of five sheets are used to map; each sheet contains two 15.25-m maps which represent 30.5 m of the test section (with the exception of SPS-6 sections 2 and 5, which are 305 m).
Each test section must be laid out consistently each time a survey is conducted. Sections begin and end at the stations marked on the pavement. Lateral extent of the section, for survey purposes, will vary depending on the existence of longitudinal joints and cracks and the relative position of the lane markings. Figures A1 and A2 illustrate the rules to follow when determining the lateral extent of the section for a distress survey. The lateral extent of the test sections should be consistent with prior distress surveys. On widened PCC sections, the lateral extent of the test section includes the full width (4.3 m) of the slab measured from the centerline longitudinal joint to the shoulder joint. The lateral extent of AC test sections with double yellow lines on the centerline are determined by using the inside yellow line.
|
![]() FIGURE A2 Test Section Limits for Surveys—Concrete Surface |
To map the test section, place the tape measure on the shoulder adjacent to the test section from Station 0+00 to Station 1+00. It may be necessary to secure the tape onto the pavement with adhesive tape or a heavy object. After the tape is in place, the distresses can be mapped with the longitudinal placement of the distresses read from the tape. The transverse placement and extent of the distresses can be recorded using the additional tape measure. After the first 30.5-m subsection is mapped, the tape measure should be moved to map the second 30.5-m subsection. The process is repeated throughout the test section.
The distresses are drawn on the map at the scaled location using the symbols appropriate to the pavement type. In general, the distress is drawn and is labeled using the distress type number and the severity level (L, M, or H) if applicable. For example, a high severity longitudinal crack in the wheel path of an ACP would be labeled "4aH." An additional symbol is added beside the distress type and severity symbol in cases where the crack or joint is well-sealed. Figures specifying the symbols to be used for each pavement type are presented in the following chapters. In addition, example maps are provided to illustrate properly completed maps.
Any observed distresses that are not described in the Distress Identification Manual should be photographed and described on the comments line of the map sheet. The location and extent of the distress should be shown and labeled on the map. Crack sealant and joint sealant condition is to be mapped only for those distresses indicated in figures A4, A5, and A8. The specific distress types that are not to be included on the maps are to be recorded as follows:
If raveling, polished aggregate, or bleeding occur in large areas over the test section, do not map the total extent. Instead, note the location and extent in the space for comments underneath the appropriate map(s). These distresses should be mapped only if they occur in localized areas. The extent of these distresses must be summarized on the data summary sheets.
If map cracking/scaling, or polished aggregate occur in large areas over the test section, do not map the total extent. Instead, note the location, extent, and severity level if applicable in the space for comments underneath the appropriate map(s). These distresses should be mapped only if they occur in localized areas.
The extent of these distresses must be summarized on the data summary sheets.
In the common data section appearing in the upper right-hand corner of each of the distress survey data sheets the six-digit SHRP ID (two-digit State code plus four-digit SHRP Section ID) is entered. The date the survey was conducted, the initials of up to three raters, before and after pavement surface temperature readings, and the code indicating whether photographs and/or video tape were obtained at the time of the survey are entered in the appropriate spaces.
Location of the vehicle wheel paths is critical for distinguishing between types of longitudinal cracking in ACP. Figure A3 illustrates the procedure for establishing the location and extent of the wheel paths. Both wheel paths must be drawn and identified on the distress maps. The distresses observed are recorded to scale on map sheets. The individual distresses and severity levels depicted on the map are carefully scaled and summed to arrive at the appropriate quantities (e.g., square meters or number of occurrences) and are then recorded on sheets 1-3. It is important to carefully evaluate the distress map for certain distress types which have multiple methods of measurement because of orientation or location within the section. Longitudinal cracking, in the wheel path or elsewhere, are examples of these. Except where indicated otherwise, entries are made for all distress data elements. If a particular type of distress does not exist on the pavement, enter "0" as a positive indication that the distress was not overlooked in summarizing the map sheets. All data sheets are to be completed in the field prior to departing the site. Symbols to be used for mapping ACP sections are contained in figure A4, and an example mapped section is shown in figure A5.
FIGURE A3
Locating Wheel Paths in Asphalt Concrete-Surfaced Pavements
FIGURE A4
Distress Map Symbols for Asphalt Concrete-Surfaced Pavements
FIGURE A5
Example Map of First 30.5 meters of Asphalt Concrete Pavement
Section
Description of Data Sheet 1
This data sheet provides space for recording measured values for the distress types identified in the left column. The units of measurement for each of the distress types are also identified in the left column. The extent of the measured distress for each particular level of severity is entered in the severity level columns identified as low, moderate, or high. Enter "0" for any distress types and/or severity levels not found.
Description of Data Sheet 2
This sheet is a continuation of the distress survey data recorded on sheet 1 and is completed as described under data sheet 1. In addition, space is provided to list "Other" distress types found on the test section but not listed on data sheets 1 or 2.
Description of Data Sheet 3
This data sheet provides space to record rutting (using a straight edge 1.2 m long). Manual rutting measurements using a straight edge are only taken for visual surveys conducted on SPS-3 experiment sections. Measurements are taken at the beginning of the test section and at 15.25 m intervals. There should be a total of 11 measurements in each wheel path, for a total of 22 measurements on each test section.
The distresses observed are recorded to scale on map sheets. This information is reduced by the rater in the field to summarize the results, which are then recorded on sheets 4-7. Except where indicated otherwise, entries are made for all distress data elements. If a particular type of distress does not exist on the pavement, enter "0" as a positive indication that the distress was not overlooked in summarizing the map sheets. Symbols to be used for mapping distresses in JCP sections are shown in figure A6, and an example mapped section is presented in figure A7.
This data sheet provides space for recording measured values for the distress types identified in the left column. The units of measurement for each of the distress types are also identified in the left column. The extent of the measured distress for each particular level of severity is entered in the severity level columns identified as low, moderate, or high. Enter "0" for any distress types and/or severity levels not found. The distress types and severity levels should be identified by using the Distress Identification Manual.
This sheet is a continuation of the distress survey data recorded on sheet 4 and is completed as described under data sheet 4. In addition, space is provided to list "Other" distress types found on the test section but not listed on data sheets 4 or 5.
This data sheet provides space to record faulting information for each transverse joint and transverse crack. Distance from the beginning of the section, and faulting measurements made at two transverse locations, are recorded. The transverse locations are 0.3 m and 0.75 m from the outside edge of the slab. For widened lanes, measure 0.3 m from the edge of the slab and 0.75 m from the outside edge of the lane edge stripe. At each location, three measurements are made, but only the approximate average of the readings is recorded to the nearest millimeter.
Although no field is provided in the space to the left of the entry for measured faulting, there is room for a negative sign when negative faulting is observed. If the "approach" slab is higher than the "departure" slab, a positive sign is assumed, but no entry is required. If the "approach" slab is lower, a negative sign is entered.
This sheet is used to record lane-to-shoulder dropoff and lane-to-shoulder separation. Lane-to-shoulder dropoff is measured as the difference in elevation, to the nearest 1 mm, between the pavement surface and the adjacent shoulder surface. Measurements are taken at the beginning of the test section and at 15.25-m intervals (a total of 11 measurements) at the lane/shoulder interface or joint. Lane-to-shoulder dropoff typically occurs when the outside shoulder settles. However, heave of the shoulder may occur due to frost action or swelling soil. If heave of the shoulder is present, it should be recorded as a negative value. At each point where there is no lane-to-shoulder dropoff, enter "0."
Lane-to-shoulder separation is measured as the width of the joint (to the nearest 1 mm) between the outside lane and the adjacent shoulder surface. Measurements are taken at the beginning of the test section and at 15.25-m intervals (a total of 11 measurements). At each point where there is no lane-to-shoulder separation, enter "0." When the surveyor is unable to take a measurement due to an anomaly such as sealant or patch material, a null value ("N") should be recorded and entered into the database.
FIGURE A7
Example Map of First 30.5 meters of a Jointed Concrete Pavement
Section
The results of distress surveys on CRCP surfaces are recorded on sheets 8-10. Except where indicated otherwise, entries are made for all distress data elements. If a particular type of distress does not exist on the pavement, enter "0" as a positive indication that the distress was not overlooked in summarizing the map sheets. All data sheets are to be completed in the field prior to departing the site. Symbols to be used for mapping CRCP distresses are contained in figure A8 and an example mapped section is presented in figure A9.
Description of Data Sheet 8
This data sheet provides space for recording measured values for the distress types identified in the left column. The units of measurement for each of the distress types are also identified in the left column. The extent of the measured distress for each particular level of severity is entered in the severity level columns identified as low, moderate, or high, except as indicated on the form. Enter "0" for any distress types and/or severity levels not found. The distress types and severity levels should be identified by using the Distress Identification Manual.
Description of Data Sheet 9
This sheet is a continuation of the distress survey data recorded on sheet 8 and is completed as described under data sheet 9. In addition, space is provided to list "Other" distress types found on the test section but not listed on data sheets 8 or 9.
Description of Data Sheet 10
This data sheet provides space to record lane-to-shoulder dropoff and lane-to-shoulder separation. Measurements are taken at the beginning of the test section and at 15.25-m intervals (a total of 11 measurements for each distress) at the lane/shoulder interface or joint.
Lane-to-shoulder dropoff is measured as the difference in elevation (to the nearest 1 mm) between the pavement surface and the adjacent shoulder surface. Lane-to-shoulder dropoff typically occurs when the outside shoulder settles. However, heave of the shoulder may occur due to frost action or swelling soil. If heave of the shoulder is present, it should be recorded as a negative (-) value.
Lane-to-shoulder separation is measured as the width of the joint (to the nearest 1 mm) between the outside lane and the adjacent shoulder surface.
When the surveyor is unable to take a measurement due to an anomaly such as a sealant or patch material, a null value ("N") is recorded and entered into the database.
At each point where there is no lane-to-shoulder dropoff or lane-to-shoulder separation, enter "0."
This part of the appendix shows completed maps and survey forms for a JCP 60 m in length. The rater uses the definitions from the Distress Identification Manual and the symbols from this appendix when mapping the section. The rater then quantifies each distress (and severity levels for the appropriate distresses) on the map. The rater then uses the right margin of the map sheets to tally the quantities of each distress type. This method is required because it simplifies totaling the various distress types, and reduces errors. The rater then uses the tallies from each map sheet to add the distress quantities. The section totals are entered in the left margin of the first map sheet.
The rater then writes in the totals in the appropriate blanks on the survey forms. All blanks are filled in. Zeros are entered if no distress was found. These forms provide a summary of the distresses found in the JCP section.
Sheet 4 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Assigned ID | 1234 |
State Code | 28 | |
SHRP Section ID | 0101 |
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH JOINTED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): 06/12/92
SURVEYORS: JSR, EJF
PHOTOS, VIDEO, OR BOTH WITH SURVEY (P, V, B): P
DISTRESS TYPE | SEVERITY LEVEL | ||
---|---|---|---|
LOW | MODERATE | HIGH | |
CRACKING | |||
1. CORNER BREAKS (Number)
|
1 | 0 | 3 |
2. DURABILITY "D" CRACKING (Number of Affected Slabs)
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
AREA AFFECTED (Square Meters)
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
3. LONGITUDINAL CRACKING (Meters)
|
4.8 | 9.2 | 0.0 |
Length Sealed (Meters) |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
4. TRANSVERSE CRACKING (Number of Cracks) (Meters)
|
1 | 1 | 0 |
Length Sealed (Meters)
|
0.0 | 3.5 | 0.0 |
JOINT DEFICIENCES
|
|||
5a. TRANSVERSE JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
Sealed? (Y,N) |
Y
|
||
If "Y" Number of Joints
|
8 | 4 | 2 |
5b. LONGITUDINAL JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
Number of Longitudinal Joint that have been sealed (0,1, or 2) |
2
|
||
Length of Damaged Sealant (Meters)
|
4.0
|
||
6. SPALLING OF LONGITUDINAL JOINTS
Number of Affected Joints |
0 | 0 | 0 |
Length Spalled (Meters)
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
7. SPALLING OF TRANSVERSE JOINTS
Number of Affected Joints |
0 | 0 | 0 |
Length Spalled (Meters)
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Revised May 29, 1992
Sheet 5 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
||
State Code | 28 | |
SHRP Section ID | 0101 |
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): 06/12/92
SURVEYORS: JSR, EJF
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH JOINTED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
DISTRESS TYPE |
SEVERITY LEVEL
|
||
---|---|---|---|
LOW | MODERATE | HIGH | |
SURFACE DEFORMATIONS
|
|||
8a. MAP CRACKING (Number)
|
0 | ||
(Square Meters)
|
0.0 | ||
8b. SCALING (Number)
|
1 | ||
(Square Meters)
|
2.0 | ||
9. POLISHED AGGREGATE (Square Meters)
|
0.0 | ||
10. POPOUTS Not Recorded
|
|||
MISCELLANEOUS DISTRESSES
|
|||
11. BLOWUPS (Number)
|
|||
12. FAULTING OF TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRAKS - REFER TO SHEET 6
|
|||
13. LANE-TO-SHOULDER DROP-OFF - REFER TO SHEET 7
|
|||
14. LANE-TO-SHOULDER SEPARATION - REFER TO SHEET 7
|
|||
15. PITCH/PATCH DETERIORATION
|
|||
Flexible
|
|||
(number)
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
(Square Meters)
|
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Rigid
|
|||
(Number)
|
1 | 2 | 0 |
(Square Meters)
|
7.0 | 21.3 | 0.0 |
16. WATER BLEEDING AND PUMPING
|
|||
(Number of occurrences)
|
2
|
||
Length Affected (Meters)
|
4.5
|
||
17. OTHER (Describe) _____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ |
Revised April 23, 1992
Sheet 6 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Assigned ID | 1234 |
State Code | 28 | |
SHRP Section ID | 0101 |
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH JOINTED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
12. FAULTING OF TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS
Point1Distance (Meters) | Joint or Crack (J/C) | Crack Length (Meters) | Well Sealed (Y/N) | Length of Joint Spalling, m | Faulting2, mm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | M | H | 0.3m | 0.75m | ||||
0.1 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
5.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | ||
10.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | ||
12.3 | C | 3.5 | Y | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
15.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
20.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | ||
25.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | ||
30.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
35.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
38.8 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | -4 | ||
40.8 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -4 | ||
45.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | ||
50.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
55.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
60.0 | J | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Note 1. Point Distance is from the start of the test section to the measurement location.
Note 2. If the "approach" slab is higher than the "departure" slab, faulting is recorded as positive (+ or 0); if the "approach" slab is lower, record faulting as negative (-) and the minus sign must be used.
Revised May 29, 1992
Sheet 7 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Assigned ID | 1234 |
State Code | 28 | |
SHRP Section ID | 0101 |
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH JOINTED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
13. LANE-TO-SHOULDER DROPOFF
14. LAN-TO-SHOULDER SEPARATION
Point No. | Point1Distance (Meters) | Lane-to-shoulder2 Dropoff | Crack Length (Meters) | Well Sealed (Y/N) | Faulting2, mm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.3m | 0.75m | |||||
1. |
0 | J | 0 | 0 | ||
2. |
15.25 | J | 3 | 4 | ||
3. |
30.5 | J | 2 | 3 | ||
4. |
45.75 | C | 3.5 | Y | 2 | 1 |
Note 1. Point Distance is from the start of the test section to the measurement location. The values shown are SI equivalents of the 50 ft spacing used in previous surveys.
Note 2. If heave of the shoulder occurs (upward movement), record as a negative (-) value. Do not record (+) signs, positive values are assumed.
These map forms and data sheets may be photocopied from this book for field use. Note that each type of pavement has its own data sheets.
ACP
|
sheets 1, 2, 3 |
---|---|
JCP
|
sheets 4, 5, 6, 7 |
CRCP
|
sheets 8, 9, 10 |
Reviewer:______ | Surveyors:______ | Pavement Temp:______ | |
Date: | Date:_____ | Before:_____ | After:_____ |
0' |
10'
|
20' | 30' | 40' | 50' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
50' |
60'
|
70' | 80' | 90' | 100' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 16 m | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 m |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sheet Summary:
|
Reviewer:______ | Surveyors:______ | Pavement Temp:______ | |
Date: | Date:_____ | Before:_____ | After:_____ |
100' |
110'
|
120' | 130' | 140' | 150' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 31 m | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 m |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
150' |
160'
|
170' | 180' | 190' | 200' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 46 m | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 m | 61 m |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sheet Summary:
|
Reviewer:______ | Surveyors:______ | Pavement Temp:______ | |
Date: | Date:_____ | Before:_____ | After:_____ |
200' |
210'
|
220' | 230' | 240' | 250' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 m |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
50' |
60'
|
70' | 80' | 90' | 100' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 77 m | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 m |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sheet Summary:
|
Reviewer:______ | Surveyors:______ | Pavement Temp:______ | |
Date: | Date:_____ | Before:_____ | After:_____ |
300' |
310'
|
320' | 330' | 340' | 350' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 92 m | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 m |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
150' |
160'
|
170' | 180' | 190' | 200' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 107 m | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 m | 122 m |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sheet Summary:
|
Reviewer:______ | Surveyors:______ | Pavement Temp:______ | |
Date: | Date:_____ | Before:_____ | After:_____ |
400' |
410'
|
420' | 430' | 440' | 450' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 m |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
450' |
460'
|
470' | 480' | 490' | 500' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5m | 15' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2m | 5' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0m | 138 m | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 m |
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sheet Summary:
|
Revised Dec 1992; Jan 1999; Feb 2002
Sheet 1 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACES
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): __/__/__
SURVEYORS: ___, ___
PHOTOS, VIDEO, OR BOTH WITH SURVEY (P, V, B): __
PAVEMENT SURFACE TEMP - BEFORE ____ °C; AFTER ____ °C
DISTRESS TYPE
|
SEVERITY LEVEL
|
||
---|---|---|---|
LOW | MODERATE | HIGH | |
CRACKING
|
|||
1. FATIGUE CRACKING (Square Meters)
|
|||
2. BLOCK CRACKING (Square Meters)
|
|||
3. EDGE CRACKING (Meters)
|
|||
4. LONGITUDINAL CRACKING
|
|||
4a. Wheelpath (Meters)
|
|||
Length Sealed (Meters)
|
|||
4b. Non-Wheelpath (Meters)
|
|||
Length Sealed (Meters)
|
|||
5. REFLECTION CRACKING AT JOINTS
|
Not Recorded
|
||
6. TRANSVERSE OF CRACKING
Number of Cracks |
|||
PATCHING AND POTHOLES
|
|||
7. PATCH/PATCH DETERIORATION
Number |
|||
(Square Meters)
|
|||
8. POTHOLES
(Number) (Square Meters) |
Revised April 23, 1993; September 1998; June 1999
Sheet 2 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): __/__/__
SURVEYORS: ___, ___
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
DISTRESS TYPE
|
SEVERITY LEVEL
|
||
---|---|---|---|
LOW | MODERATE | HIGH | |
SURFACE DEFORMATION
|
|||
9. RUTTING - REFER TO SHEET 3 FOR SPS - 3 FOR FORM S1 SEE DIPSTICK MANUAL
|
|||
10. SHOVING
(Number) |
|||
(Square Meters)
|
|||
11. BLEEDING (Square Meters)
|
|||
12. POLISHED AGGREGATE (Square Meters)
|
|||
13. RAVELING (Square Meters)
|
|||
MISCELLANEOUS DISTRESSES
|
|||
14. LANE-TO-SHOULDER DROPOFF - NOT RECORDED
|
Not Recorded | ||
15. WATER BLEEDING AND PUMPING (Number)
|
|||
Length of Affected Pavement (Meters)
|
|||
16. OTHER (Describe) |
Revised May 29, 1992: September 1998
Sheet 2 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): __/__/__
SURVEYORS: ___, ___
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
9. RUTTING (FOR SPS-3 SURVEYS)
INNER WHEEL PATH | OUTER WHEEL PATH | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Point No. | Point Distance 1 (Meters) | Rut Depth (mm) | Point No. | Point Distance 1 (Meters) | Rut Depth (mm) |
1 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.0 | ||
2 | 15.25 | 2 | 15.25 | ||
3 | 30.5 | 3 | 30.5 | ||
4 | 45.75 | 4 | 45.75 | ||
5 | 61.0 | 5 | 61.0 | ||
6 | 76.25 | 6 | 76.25 | ||
7 | 91.5 | 7 | 91.5 | ||
8 | 106.75 | 8 | 106.75 | ||
9 | 122.0 | 9 | 122.0 | ||
10 | 137.25 | 10 | 137.25 | ||
11 | 152.5 | 11 | 152.5 |
14. LANE-TO-SHOULDER DROPOFF -- Not Recorded
Note 1: "Point Distance" is the distance in meters for the start of the test section to the point where the measurement was made. The values shown are approximate S1 equivalents of the 50 ft spacing used in previous surveys.
Revised May 29, 1992; September 1998
Sheet 4 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH JOINTED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): __/__/__
SURVEYORS: ___, ___
PAVEMENT SURFACE TEMP - BEFORE ____ °C; AFTER ____ °C
PHOTOS, VIDEO, OR BOTH WITH SURVEY (P, V, B): __
DISTRESS TYPE |
SEVERITY LEVEL
|
||
---|---|---|---|
LOW | MODERATE | HIGH | |
CRACKING
|
|||
1. CORNER BREAKS (Number)
|
|||
2. DURABILITY "D" CRACKING (Number of Affected Slabs)
|
|||
AREA AFFECTED (Square Meters)
|
|||
3. LONGITUDINAL CRACKING (Meters) Length Sealed (Meters)
|
|||
4. TRANSVERSE CRACKING (Number of Cracks)
|
|||
(Meters)
|
|||
Length Sealed (Meters)
|
|||
JOINT DEFICIENCES
|
|||
5a. TRANSVERSE JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
Sealed? (Y,N) |
|||
If "Y" Number of Joints
|
|||
5b. LONGITUDINAL JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
Number of Longitudinal Joint that have been sealed (0,1, or 2) |
|||
Length of Damaged Sealant (Meters)
|
|||
6. SPALLING OF LONGITUDINAL JOINTS
Number of Affected Joints |
|||
Length Spalled (Meters)
|
|||
7. SPALLING OF TRANSVERSE JOINTS
Number of Affected Joints |
|||
Length Spalled (Meters)
|
Revised May 29, 1992; September 1998
Sheet 5 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): __/__/__
SURVEYORS: ___, ___
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH JOINTED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
DISTRESS TYPE |
SEVERITY LEVEL
|
||
---|---|---|---|
LOW | MODERATE | HIGH | |
SURFACE DEFORMATION
|
|||
8a. MAP CRACKING (Number)
|
|||
(Square Meters)
|
|||
8b. SCALING (Number)
|
|||
(Square Meters)
|
|||
9. POLISHED AGGREGATE (Square Meters)
|
|||
10. POPOUTS - Not Recorded
|
|||
MISCELLANEOUS DISTRESSES
|
|||
11. BLOWUPS (Number)
|
|||
12. FAULTING OF TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS - REFER TO SHEET 6
|
|||
13. LANE-TO-SHOULDER DROPOFF - REFER TO SHEET 7
|
|||
14. LANE-TO-SHOULDER SEPARATION - REFER TO SHEET 7
|
|||
15. PITCH/PATCH DETERIORATION
|
|||
Flexible
|
|||
(number)
|
|||
(Square Meters)
|
|||
Rigid
|
|||
(Number)
|
|||
(Square Meters)
|
|||
16. WATER BLEEDING AND PUMPING
|
|||
(Number of occurrences)
|
|||
Length Affected (Meters)
|
|||
17. OTHER (Describe) _____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ |
Revised April 23, 1993; September 1998; June 1999
Sheet 6 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): __/__/__
SURVEYORS: ___, ___
FAULTMETER NO. _____________
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH JOINTED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
12. FAULTING OF TRANSVERSE JOINTS AND CRACKS
Point1 Distance (Meters) | J/C |
Faulting2, mm
|
Point 1 Distance (Meters) | J/C |
Faulting2,mm
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.3m | 0.75m | 0.3m | 0.75m | ||||
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
_ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
Note 1. Point Distance is from the start from the test section to the measurement location.
Note 2. If the approach slab is higher than the departure slab, faulting is recorded as positive (+ or 0); if the approach slab is lower, record faulting as negative (-) and the minus sign must be used.
Revised May 29, 1992
Sheet 7 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): __/__/__
SURVEYORS: ___, ___
FAULTMETER NO. _____________
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH JOINTED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
13.LANE-TO-SHOULDER DROP-OFF
14.LANE-TO-SHOULDER SEPARATION
Point No. | Point 1 Distance (Meters) | Lane-to-shoulder 2 Dropoff (mm) | Lane-to-shoulder Separation (mm) | Well Sealed (Y/N) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.
|
0.0
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
2.
|
15.25
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
3.
|
30.5
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
4.
|
45.75
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
5.
|
61.0
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
6.
|
76.25
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
7.
|
91.5
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
8.
|
106.75
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
9.
|
122.0
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
10.
|
137.25
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
11.
|
152.5
|
__ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
Note 1. Point Distance is from the start of the test section to
the measurement location. The values shown are S1 equivalents of the
50ft spacing used in previous surveys.
Note 2. If heave of the shoulder occurs (upward movement), record
as a negative (-) value. Do not record (+) signs, positive values are assumed.
Revised December 30, 1992; September 1998
Sheet 8 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH CONTINUOUSLY REINFORCED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): (MONTH/DAY/YEAR)
SURVEYORS: _ _ _ , _ _ _
PHOTOS, VIDEO, OR BOTH WITH SURVEY (P, V, B): _
PAVEMENT SURFACE TEMP - BEFORE _ _ _ _ °C; AFTER _ _ _ _ °C
5. POLISHED AGG
DISTRESS TYPE | SEVERITY LEVEL | ||
---|---|---|---|
LOW | MODERATE | HIGH | |
CRACKING
|
|||
1. DURABILITY "D" CRACKING (No. of affected Trans Cracks)
|
_ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
(Square Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ |
2. LONGITUDINAL CRACKING (Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ |
Length Sealed (Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ |
3. TRANSVERSE CRACKING (Total Number of Cracks)
|
_ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
(Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ |
SURFACE DEFECTS
|
|||
4a. MAP CRACKING (Number)
|
_ _ _ | ||
(Square Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | ||
4b SCALING (Number)
|
_ _ _ | ||
(Square Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | ||
5. POLISHED AGGREGATE (Square Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | ||
6. POPOUTS Not Recorded
|
Revised May 29, 1992
Sheet 9 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): __/__/__
SURVEYORS: ___, ___
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH CONTINUOUSLY REINFORCED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
DISTRESS TYPE | SEVERITY LEVEL | ||
---|---|---|---|
LOW | MODERATE | HIGH | |
MISCELLANEOUS DISTRESSES
|
|||
7. BLOWUPS (Number)
|
_ _ _ | ||
8. TRANSVERSE CONSTRUCTION JOINT DETERIORATION (Number)
|
_ _ | _ _ | _ _ |
9. LANE-TO-SHOULDER DROPOFF - REFER TO SHEET 10
|
|||
10. LANE-TO-SHOULDER SEPARATION - REFER TO SHEET 10
|
|||
11. PATCH/ PATCH DETERIORATION
|
|||
Flexible
(Number) |
_ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
(Square Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ |
Rigid
(Number) |
_ _ _ | _ _ _ | _ _ _ |
(Square Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ |
12. PUNCHOUTS (Number)
|
_ _ | _ _ | _ _ |
13. SPALLING OF LONGITUDINAL JOINT (Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ | _ _ _ . _ |
14. WATER BLEEDING AND PUMPING (Number of Occurrences)
|
_ _ _ | ||
Length Affected (Meters)
|
_ _ _ . _ | ||
15._ LONGITUDINAL JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
Number of Longitudinal Joints that have been sealed (0, 1, or 2) |
_ | ||
If Sealed Length w/ Damaged Sealant (Meters)
|
__ __ __.__ | ||
16. OTHER (Describe)_____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ |
Revised May 29, 1992
Sheet 10 Distress Survey LTPP Program |
State Code | __ |
SHRP Section ID | ____ |
DATE OF DISTRESS SURVEY (MONTH/YEAR): __/__/__
SURVEYORS: ___, ___
DISTRESS SURVEY FOR PAVEMENTS WITH CONTINUOUSLY REINFORCED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SURFACES (CONTINUED)
9. LANE-TO-SHOULDER DROPOFF
10. LANE-TO-SHOULDER SEPARATION
Point No. | Point 1 Distance (Meters) | Lane-to-shoulder 2 Dropoff (mm) | Lane-to-shoulder Separation (mm) | Well Sealed (Y/N) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 0.0 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
2. | 15.25 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
3. | 30.5 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
4. | 45.75 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
5. | 61.0 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
6. | 76.25 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
7. | 91.5 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
8. | 106.75 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
9. | 122.0 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
10. | 137.25 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
11. | 152.5 | __ __ __ | __ __ __ | __ |
Note 1. Point Distance is from the start of the test section to the measurement location. The values shown are S1 equivalents of the 50 ft spacing used in previous surveys.
Note 2. If heave of the shoulder occurs (upward movement), record as a negative (-) value. Do not record (+) sign, positive values are assumed.