U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

Report
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-09-039
Date: April 2010

Pavement Marking Demonstration Project: State of Alaska and State of Tennessee-Report to Congress

References

Previous | Table of Contents

  1. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). (2005). Public Law No. 109-59, 119 Statute 1144.
  2. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2007). Pocket Guide to Transportation 2007, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.bts.gov/publications/pocket_guide_to_ transportation/2007/. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.
  3. Federal Highway Administration. (2003). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
  4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2008). Driving Down Lane Departure Crashes-A National Priority. Obtained from: http://news. transportation.org/press_release.aspx?Action=ViewNews&NewsID=170. Site last accessed September 4, 2009.
  5.   American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Implementing the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Obtained from: http://safety.transportation.org/. Site last accessed September 4, 2009.
  6. Falk, K.W. and Carlson, P.J. (2008). Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity Workshop: Summary Report, FHWA-SA-08-003, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  7. Carlson, P.J., Park, E.S., and Andersen, C.K. (2009). The Benefits of Pavement Markings: A Renewed Perspective Based on Recent and Ongoing Research, Transportation Research Board DVD Compendium of Papers, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
  8. National Association of County Engineers Resource Training and Education. Local Road and Bridge Facts." Obtained from: http://www.naco.org/NACETemplate.cfm?Section=Resources,_Training_and_Education&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=8007. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.
  9. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2004). Table 1-4: Public Road and Street Mileage by Type of Surface." Obtained from: http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/2004/html/table_01_04.html. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.
  10. Gates, T.J. and Hawkins, H.G. (2002). The Use of Wider Longitudinal Pavement Markings, Report No. 0024-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
  11. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). Highway Safety Manual. Washington, DC.
  12. Hauer, E. (1997). Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety: Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety, Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science, Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  13. Persaud, B. and Lyon, C. (2007). Empirical Bayes Before-After Safety Studies: Lessons Learned from Two Decades of Experience and Future Directions," Accident Analysis & Prevention, (39)546-555.
  14. Thomas, I.L. and Taylor, W.T. (1960). Effect of Edge Striping on Traffic Operations." Highway Research Board Bulletin 244, 11-15, Washington, DC.
  15. Wheeler, R.E. (1974). Portable Power," Technometrics, 16, 193-201.
  16. Nelson, L.S. (1985). Sample Size Tables for Analysis of Variance," Journal of Quality Technology, 17, 167-169.
  17. Bratcher, T.L., Moran, M.A., and Zimmer, W.J. (1990). Tables of Sample Sizes in the Analysis of Variances," Journal of Quality Technology, 2, 156-164.
  18. Krammes, R.A., Tyer, K.D., Middleton, D.R., and Feldman, S.A. (1990). An Alternative to Post-Mounted Delineators at Horizontal Curves on Two-Lane Highways, Report No. 1145-1F, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
  19. Dudek, C.L., Huchingson, R.D., Creasey, F.T., and Pendleton, O. (1988). Field Studies of Temporary Pavement Markings at Overlay Project Work Zones on Two-Lane, Two-Way Rural Highways," Transportation Research Record 1160, 22-34, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  20. ASTM International. (1999). Standard Specification for Minimum Retroreflectance of Newly Applied Pavement Marking Using Portable Hand-Operated Instruments, Designation D 6359-99, West Conshohocken, PA.
  21. ASTM International. (2005). Standard Test Method for Measurement of Retroreflective Pavement Marking Materials with CEN-Prescribed Geometry Using a Portable Retroreflectometer, Designation E 1710-0, West Conshohocken, PA.
  22. Tennessee Department of Transportation Construction Division. (2007). Average Unit Prices- 2007 Awarded Contracts." Obtained from: http://www.tdot.state.tn.us/ construction/Average%20Unit%20Prices/aup_2007.pdf. Site last accessed July 1, 2008.
  23. Missouri Department of Transportation Bid Opening Information. (2007). District 1 2007 Unit Bid Prices." Obtained from: http://www.modot.mo.gov/eBidLettingPublicWeb/viewStream.do?documentType=general_info&key=537. Site last accessed July 1, 2008.
  24. Gates, T.J., Hawkins Jr., H.G., and Rose, E.R. (2003). Effective Pavement Marking Materials and Applications for Portland Cement Concrete Roadways, Report No. FHWA/TX-03/4150-2, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
  25. Donnell, E.T., Garvey, P.M., Sathyanarayanan, S., and Lee, D. (2005). Methods to Maintain Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity, Draft Final Report Vol. I, Contract No. DTFH61-05-R-00113, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  26. Cottrell, B. and Hanson, R. (2001). Determining the Effectiveness of Pavement Marking Materials, Report No. VTRC 01-R9, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA.
  27. Migletz, J., Graham, J.L., Harwood, D.W., Bauer, K.M., and Sterner, P.L. (2000). Evaluation of All-Weather Pavement Markings, Report No. C1038/3524-04, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.
  28. Andrady, A.L. (1997). Pavement Marking Materials: Assessing Environment-Friendly Performance," NCHRP Report 392, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  29. Migletz, J. and Graham, J. (2002). Long-Term Pavement Marking Practices: A Synthesis of Highway Practice," NCHRP Synthesis 306, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  30. Hawkins Jr., H.G., Gates, T.J., and Rose, E.R. (2004). Pavement Marking Handbook, Product 0-4150-P1, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
  31. Lagergren, E., Bertsch, J., and Fernald, D. (2006). I-90 Pavement Marking Material Test, Proceedings from Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  32. Hawkins, N., Smadi, O., Hans, Z., and Resler, J. (2007). To Groove or Not to Groove, That is the Question, Proceedings from Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  33. Texas Department of Transportation. Average Low Bid Unit Price, Highway Construction Projects. Obtained from: ftp://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cmd/cserve/bidprice/as1458.txt. Site last accessed July 1, 2008.
  34. North Carolina Department of Transportation. (2008). 2008 Yearly Bid Averages. Obtained from: http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/ps/contracts/bidaverages/yearave08.xls. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.
  35. Debaillon, C., Carslon, P., He, Y., Schnell, T., and Aktan, F. (2007). Updates to Research on Recommended Minimum Levels for Pavement Markings Retroreflectivity to Meet Driver Night Visibility Needs, Report No. FHWA-HRT-07-059, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  36. Hawkins, N. and Smadi, O. ( 2007). Survey on Pavement Marking Practices, Center for Transportation Research and Education at Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
  37. Washington State Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. Division 9, Materials, Section 9-34.4: Glass Beads. Obtained from: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/fulltext/M41-10/D9.pdf. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.
  38. California Department of Transportation, Office of Materials Engineering and Testing Services, Office of Testing and Technology Services, Chemical Testing Branch. (2009). Specification for Glass Spheres (Beads), Specification #8010-004. Obtained from: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/ttsb/chemical/pdf/8010_004_mar24_09.pdf. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.
  39. California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Unofficial California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 4.5. Chapter 11, Article 3, Characteristics of Hazardous Waste. Obtained from: http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/LawsRegsPolicies/Title22/upload/OEARA_REG_Title22_Ch11_Art3.pdf. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.
  40. California State Senate. Assembly Bill No. 2251: Highway Markings: Reflective Glass Beads. Obtained from: http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2251-2300/ab_2251_bill_20080220_introduced.pdf. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.
  41. U.K. Highways Agency. Manual of Contract Documents for Highway Works Volume 2: Notes for Guidance on the Specification for Highway Works, London, England. Obtained from: http://www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/mchw/vol2/pdfs/series_ng_1200.pdf. Site last accessed on July 1, 2008.
  42. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2008). Road Marking Materials: Drop Materials: Glass Beads, Antiskid Aggregates and Mixtures of the Two, EN 1423, Revision Draft, Brussels, Belgium.
  43. SWARCO Holdings AG. (2007). SWARCO News, 1/2007, Innsbruck, Austria. Obtained from: http://www.swarco.com/downloads/Swarco_News_1_2007.pdf. Site last accessed July 1, 2008.
  44. Materials Engineering Branch, Main Roads, Government of Western Australia. (2008). Heavy Metal Concentration of Glass Beads, Standard 71/06/1398. Obtained from: http://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/BuildingRoads/Pages/StandardsTechnical.aspx. Site last accessed June 8, 2009.
  45. New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research. (2008). Heavy Metal Contamination in Highway Marking Beads, Quarterly Report June 2008. Obtained from: http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/refdata/research/pdf/rowanqrep/rowan_08_q2_heavy_metal.pdf. Site last accessed July 1, 2008.
  46. Jantzen, C.M., Pickett, J.B., and Schumacher, R.F. (2000). Mining Industry Waste Remediated for Recycle by Vitrification, Report No. WSRC-MS-2000-00195, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science & Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN. Obtained from: http://sti.srs.gov/fulltext/ms2000195/ms2000195.html. Site last accessed July 1, 2008.
  47. New Jersey Department of Transportation Bureau of Research. (2008). Heavy Metal Contamination in Highway Marking Beads, Quarterly Report June 2008. Obtained from: http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/refdata/research/pdf/rowanqrep/rowan_08_q2_heavy_metal.pdf. Site last accessed July 1, 2008.
  48. Thompson, S. National Transportation Product Evaluation Program Best Practices Manual: Transverse Pavement Marking Test Decks. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, DC.
  49. Carlson, P.J., Miles, J., and Chalmers, S. (2006). Strategy for Evaluating Durable Pavement Marking Materials for High Traffic Areas and Mountain Passes, Draft Final Report NCHRP 20-07/Task 190, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
  50. Bahar, G., Masliah, M., Erwin, T., Tan, E., and Hauer, E. (2006). Pavement Marking Materials and Markers: Safety Impact and Cost effectiveness, NCHRP Web-Only Document 92. Obtained from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_webdoc_92.pdf. Site last accessed on June 8, 2009.

Previous | Table of Contents

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101