U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Skip to content

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-RD-95-197
Date: December 1996

Development of Human Factors Guidelines for Advanced Traveler Information Systems and Commercial Vehicle Operations: Comparable Systems Analysis




Accident statistics associated with the TravTek evaluation program were quite positive. Even using the most conservative comparison groups (i.e., non-visitors, non-rental car users, national averages), a statistical difference (or even an approach to significance) in accident rate does not exist between the TravTek users and any comparison group (Perez and Van Aerde, personal communication, 1993). Even though the TravTek users drove more than 1.6 million km, accident rates require extremely large exposures to be reliable. Still, these results are encouraging with respect to the safety of ATIS systems.

Global TravTek usability questionaire responses


Mean trip planning time as a function of display configuration


Mean travel time as a function of display configuration


Mean number of wrong turns as a function of display configuration


In addition to accident rates, near misses were analyzed in the Camera Car Study and as an item in the post–experiment questionnaire. The Camera Car Study found a surprising lack of near–miss data (Dingus, to be published). In detailed frame–by–frame analysis of 90 hours of video tape, only a handful of what could truly be considered close calls were identified. Of those identified, no more were found (in general) under the TravTek conditions than under the control conditions (paper map and paper directions list). For the question, How many times did you experience "close calls" (or near accidents) while driving the vehicle?, the mean response was approximately 1.3 on a 1 = never to 6 = frequently scale.

The questionnaire also asked a general safety question about the TravTek system––Do you think that TravTek helped you drive more safely in Orlando? The response to this question was a slightly positive 4.4 on a 1 = "Didn't help me drive safely" to 6 = "Helped me drive safely" scale.

The initial results described above indicate that safety does not necessarily degrade with the use of ATIS systems such as TravTek, particularly in comparison to other existing means of navigation. Additional analyses aimed at assessing the safety benefits of TravTek will be forthcoming as the analysis and reporting process continues.


Back | Next

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101