| Continuity of Thought and Logic |
|
|
|
|
| Are sentences and paragraphs limited to single ideas? |
|
|
|
|
| Is there an orderly arrangement of ideas
throughout the specification? |
|
|
|
|
| Do requirements follow the natural
sequence of the work? |
|
|
|
|
| Method of Presentation and Overall
Organization |
|
|
|
|
| Is the five-part format (or agency
equivalent) used? |
|
|
|
|
| Is the specification structured so that all
information is easily accessible? |
|
|
|
|
| Are headings used to make it easier for
readers to find information? |
|
|
|
|
| Language and Style |
|
|
|
|
| Is the language of the specification free of
vague and ambiguous words and
phrases? |
|
|
|
|
| Does the specification correctly use active
voice and imperative mood? |
|
|
|
|
| Does the specification use shall and will
correctly? |
|
|
|
|
| Is formatting consistent? |
|
|
|
|
| Is capitalization consistent (e.g., work vs.
Work, engineer vs. Engineer)? |
|
|
|
|
| Is word choice consistent (e.g., pipe vs.
conduit, select fill vs. gravel, reinforcing
steel vs. rebar)? |
|
|
|
|
| Measurable Standards |
|
|
|
|
| Does the specification provide a clear
description of what is to be measured for
payment and the method of
measurement? |
|
|
|
|
| Does the specification identify where and
when the measurements will be made? |
|
|
|
|
| Can the inspector, using the specification
as the standard of performance, determine
whether the Contractor has complied with
all of the specified work requirements? |
|
|
|
|
| Have escape clauses been avoided (e.g., requirements involving the "opinion of the Engineer")? |
|
|
|
|
| Sampling and Testing Requirements: Does the specification describe how acceptance will be determined? Are the
specified tests necessary, or will product certification suffice? |
|
|
|
|
| Submittals: Does the specification describe the necessary submittal requirements? Are the submittal requirements realistic (i.e., are shop drawings really necessary or is catalog information sufficient)? |
|
|
|
|
| Coordinating Information and Requirements |
|
|
|
|
| Has the specification been closely examined for redundancies, contradiction, ambiguities, duplication, and overlap? |
|
|
|
|
| Are the specifications and drawings compatible? |
|
|
|
|
| Are drawings used where needed to amplify the work requirements? |
|
|
|
|
| PS&E Submittals |
|
|
|
|
| Are the current FHWA required standard provisions included as required by 23 CFR 633 Subpart A (i.e. FHWA-1273)? |
|
|
|
|
| Are the DBE participation goals identified
(49 CFR Section 26)? |
|
|
|
|
| Are Buy America Act provisions included
(23 CFR 635.410)? |
|
|
|
|
| Are the standard clauses on differing site
conditions, suspensions of work, and
significant changes in the character of the
work included? |
|
|
|
|
| Do specifications satisfy all state, county,
and local requirements and permit
conditions? |
|
|
|
|
| Are the current Department of Labor
Minimum Wage Rates included? |
|
|
|
|
| Are all proprietary products acceptable (ie.
has a "finding in the public’s interest" been
documented per 23 CFR 635.411)? |
|
|
|
|
| For any materials to be provided by the
State or from sources designated by the
State, has a public interest finding been
obtained? Do the bidding documents
identify the location and any other
conditions to be met for the contractor to
secure the materials? |
|
|
|
|
| Are guarantee or warranty clauses
included? (23 CFR 635.413) |
|
|
|
|
| Are alternative contracting procedures
included? Is SEP-14 and/or SEP-15
approval needed? |
|
|
|
|
| Are any experimental features included in
the project? If so, do you concur with their
incorporation into the project and have you
coordinated with the Division’s Technology
Transfer Engineer? |
|
|
|
|
| Are items shown as participating in fact eligible for federal funding? |
|
|
|
|
| Are items shown as non-participating listed
separately? |
|
|
|
|
| Are all force account items reasonable (23 CFR 635 Subpart B)? |
|
|
|
|
| Are itemized quantities/costs reasonable? |
|
|
|
|
