U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
New Mexico Division
Previous | Table of Contents | Next
Project Name |
|
|
|
Engineer’s Estimate |
|
Contract ID |
|
Letting Date |
|
PS&E Checklist review complete and ready for Authorization.
Engineer’s Signature:
Date
|
Reference (23 CFR x) |
Item |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
450.216 |
Is this project programmed in the currently approved STIP? |
|
|
|
450.322 |
Is this project in an MPO area? |
|
|
|
If so, is it programmed in the MTP and/or TIP? |
|
|
|
|
|
Does the FMIS project description match the description and funds in the TIP/STIP? |
|
|
|
|
Is the authorization request a conversion of a non Federal-aid funded project? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If so, does the project meet and document compliance with all Federal-aid requirements? |
|
|
|
|
If so, does the authorization request include only those costs anticipated after authorization/obligation of funds? |
|
|
|
|
627.1 |
Has a Value Engineering (VE) Study been conducted? |
|
|
|
625.3(f) |
Are any design exceptions incorporated into this project? |
|
|
|
If so, list design exception(s): |
|
|
|
|
|
Does the project involve new or revised Interstate Access? |
|
|
|
If so, has the Interchange Justification/Modification Study been approved by the NMDOT and FHWA? |
|
|
|
|
635-Subpart B |
Is the project being competitively bid? |
|
|
|
Is NMDOT or local force account construction work to be utilized on this project? |
|
|
|
|
If so, has an emergency determination, or Cost Effective Determination been approved by the NMDOT and FHWA? |
|
|
|
|
635.407 |
Are any materials to be supplied by the Local Public Agency or the NMDOT? |
|
|
|
If so, has a Public Interest Finding (PIF) been approved by the NMDOT and FHWA? Date Approved __________ |
|
|
|
|
635.411 |
Are patented or proprietary materials shown in the plans or specifications? |
|
|
|
If so, has the use of the proprietary material been approved by the NMDOT and FHWA? |
|
|
|
|
Federal-aid Policy Guide G 6042.4 |
Are experimental features utilized on this project? |
|
|
|
If so, has a Work Plan been approved by the NMDOT and FHWA? Date Approved __________ |
|
|
|
|
635.413 |
Warranties are approved. |
|
|
|
620.101 |
Is the project located within 2 miles of an airport? |
|
|
|
If so, has the project been coordinated with FAA? |
|
|
|
|
If so, are air-highway clearances adequate for safe movement of traffic? |
|
|
|
|
625.2(c) |
Safety improvements are commensurate with level of work proposed. |
|
|
|
|
Appropriate review of the PS&E package has been completed by the NMDOT and FHWA. |
|
|
|
|
Plans have been approved by the appropriate official (PE if required). |
|
|
|
|
All comments and issues from previous review reports, meeting summaries, etc. been satisfactorily addressed. |
|
|
|
Environmental |
||||
771 |
Environmental documentation for the project has been approved. (select appropriate approval) |
|
|
|
771.129 |
Is a reassessment or re-evaluation of the environmental document needed? |
|
|
|
771.113 |
Required public hearing transcripts have been received and accepted. |
|
|
|
772.11g |
Are noise walls included in the project? |
|
|
|
|
Have environmental commitments been incorporated into the final design and contract documents? (select all that apply) |
|
|
|
635.407 |
Public interest findings are documented for mandatory waste or borrow sites. |
|
|
|
|
Have all environmental permits for the project been secured? |
|
|
|
|
Is the contractor responsible for obtaining any permits or external agency approvals for this project? |
|
|
|
If so, what Permit/Agency Approval(s) are required? |
|
|
|
|
Right-of-way |
||||
635.309 |
ROW certification has been approved. |
|
|
|
|
ROW acquisition and relocation is complete. |
|
|
|
|
The acquired ROW is adequate to facilitate construction of the project. |
|
|
|
|
If the ROW will not be clear prior to authorization, are proper stipulations contained in the proposal? |
|
|
|
If so, list restrictions on the contractor: |
|
|
|
|
If so, when is it estimated the Right-of-Way will be clear? ______________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
Utilities |
||||
635.309 |
Utility certification has been approved. |
|
|
|
|
Have utility agreements for all utilities affected by this project been completed and approved? |
|
|
|
|
Have all utilities affected by this project been relocated or will be relocated prior to advertisement? |
|
|
|
|
If all utilities have not been relocated prior to advertisement, does the proposal include a special provision stipulating utility coordination with the prime contractor for each utility? |
|
|
|
|
If utility relocation is required, the approved NTC is included in the contract documents. |
|
|
|
Railroad |
||||
635.309 |
Railroad certification has been approved. |
|
|
|
646 |
Does the project require use of or adjustment of railroad facilities? |
|
|
|
646.107 |
If so, railroad insurance is provided. |
|
|
|
646.216(d) |
If so, agreement is in writing between the NMDOT and Railroad. |
|
|
|
646.214(b) |
If so, adequate railroad grade crossing warning devices are provided. |
|
|
|
Work Zone |
||||
|
Work Zone checklists J and K have been completed. |
|
|
|
Comments:
|
Reference | Item |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do the contract plans contain the following: |
|
|
|
Cover Sheet, Vicinity Map, Index, General Notes |
|
|
|
|
Typical Sections |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Quantities |
|
|
|
|
Plan Sheets |
|
|
|
|
Profile Sheets |
|
|
|
|
Drainage Sheets |
|
|
|
|
Cross Sections |
|
|
|
|
Traffic Control Plans |
|
|
|
|
Signing and Striping Plans |
|
|
|
|
Lighting Plans |
|
|
|
|
Traffic Signal Plans |
|
|
|
|
Special Detail Sheets |
|
|
|
|
Structure/Bridge Plans |
|
|
|
|
Utility Relocation Plans |
|
|
|
|
Other: ____________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
Does the cover sheet include all required information (project number, NMDOT control number, termini, county, route, milepost, etc.)? |
|
|
|
630.205 |
Do the contract plans describe the location and design features and the construction requirements in sufficient detail to facilitate construction and the estimation of construction costs of the project? |
|
|
|
|
Does the project utilize the current version of the NMDOT Standard Drawings? |
|
|
|
|
Are local standard drawings, sepia drawings, or special details incorporated into the project? |
|
|
|
|
If so, have they been reviewed and approved by NMDOT and FHWA? Date Approved: __________ |
|
|
|
|
Are the details, typical sections and profile sheets adequate to show the complexity of work? |
|
|
|
|
Have all pay items been checked against the construction plans? |
|
|
|
|
Have all bridge plans been reviewed by Division Bridge/Structures Engineer and comments resolved? |
|
|
|
|
Are Right-of-Way, easement, and control of access lines shown on the plans? |
|
|
|
635.309(j) |
Appropriate measures to ensure environmental conditions and commitments are met are clearly shown on the plans. |
|
|
|
635.309(i) |
Have provisions to minimize water pollution and soil erosion been included in the plans? |
|
|
|
625.3 |
Have geometric design standards been met for: |
|
|
|
Design Speed |
|
|
|
|
Lane Width |
|
|
|
|
Shoulder Width |
|
|
|
|
Structural Capacity |
|
|
|
|
Horizontal Alignment |
|
|
|
|
Vertical Alignment |
|
|
|
|
Grades |
|
|
|
|
Stopping Sight Distance |
|
|
|
|
Cross Slope |
|
|
|
|
Super elevation |
|
|
|
|
Horizontal Clearance |
|
|
|
|
Vertical Clearance |
|
|
|
|
626 |
Is the pavement design adequate? |
|
|
|
625 |
Does the design conform to Federal-aid design standards for geometric and structural design of highways and/or NMDOT policy and guidance manuals? |
|
|
|
|
Are the clear zone and safety appurtenances provided for this project in accordance with the current edition of the AASHTO Roadside Design Guide? |
|
|
|
655.603 |
Are all traffic control devices provided with this project consistent with the current edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)? |
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
Permanent |
|
|
|
|
630 (J) |
Is a temporary traffic control plan provided and consistent with regulations on Work Zone Safety & Mobility? |
|
|
|
Has the Transportation Management Plan (TMP) been approved by NMDOT and FHWA? |
|
|
|
|
630.1012 |
Traffic management plan is approved and included. |
|
|
|
652 |
Are appropriate accommodations provided for bicyclists and pedestrians along the project and intersecting roadways? |
|
|
|
|
Are pedestrian facilities designed in accordance Americans with Disabilities Act requirements? |
|
|
|
652.7(b) |
Are pedestrian and bike routes pursuant to an overall plan? |
|
|
|
650.117 |
Is the required hydraulic data shown on the plans? |
|
|
|
|
Are the details sufficient to describe the required installation of drainage facilities including culverts, erosion control structures, headwalls, inlets, and manholes? |
|
|
|
|
Overall plan quality is generally acceptable. |
|
|
|
Comments:
|
Reference | Item |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
|
Does the project utilize the current version of the NMDOT Standard Specifications? |
|||
|
Are local specifications or supplemental specifications utilized on the project? |
|||
|
If so, have they been reviewed and approved by the NMDOT and FHWA? Date Approved: __________ |
|||
630.205 |
Special Provisions and Supplemental Specifications are satisfactory. |
|||
635.309(j) |
Special Provisions contain commitments for environmental mitigation (which is contained in the environmental documentation). |
|||
630.205(b) |
Specifications contain the written instructions for constructing the project. |
|||
|
Supplemental Specifications cover new or additional construction items or substantial changes regarding items not included in the standard specifications. |
|||
|
Are all pay items covered by an appropriate specification that agrees with the plans for basis of payment? |
|||
|
Detailed description of the work, materials, construction methods, measurement method, basis of payment, and pay item for each item of work is outlined. |
|||
|
Contract time is acceptable. |
|||
|
Appropriate documents from the NMDOT “Boiler Plate for Federal Funded Projects” have been included in the contract documents. |
Comments:
|
Item | Yes |
No |
N/A |
Does the estimate include a pay item for all work included in the plans? |
|
|
|
Are all estimated unit prices reasonable and comparable to average unit bid prices or construction industry trends? |
|
|
|
Are Federal-aid non-participating items included in this project? |
|
|
|
If so, non-participating items separately listed in the estimate and/or plans include items: __________ |
|
|
|
Is the amount of the estimate consistent with the amount of Federal-aid funding requested for the construction phase? |
|
|
|
Engineer’s Estimate unit prices are reasonable for the areas, times, and characteristics of the work to be done. |
|
|
|
Unit prices have been reviewed to determine if changes in estimated unit prices are needed to reflect any trends that have occurred within the past 3-6 months. |
|
|
|
Incentive/disincentive or escalation clauses have been considered in determining the estimated unit costs. |
|
|
|
Estimate includes an item number, description of the item, estimated quantity, unit, and price for each proposed item of work. |
|
|
|
Haul road restoration item is provided. |
|
|
|
State option borrow costs are provided. |
|
|
|
Salvage credit is shown. |
|
|
|
Utility and railroad force account work is covered. |
|
|
|
Class and breakdown of funding are correct for highway classification. |
|
|
|
Comments:
|