U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Policy and Governmental Affairs

FHWA Home / Policy & Governmental Affairs / Conditions and Performance Report

Conditions and Performance Report

Conditions and Performance Report
Chapter 6—Highway, Bridge and Transit Finance

Conditions and Performance Chapter Listing

Conditions and Performance Home Page


Introduction

Summary


Highway and Bridge Finance

Transit Finance

 

Highway Capital Outlay Expenditures - 1997

Federal agencies directly spent $0.3 billion on highway capital outlay in 1997, 0.5 percent of the $48.7 billion spent on capital outlay by all levels of government. Federal grants to State and local governments for highways totaled $19.8 billion, the equivalent of an additional 40.6 percent of total capital spending. Since most Federal highway grants are restricted to being used for capital outlay, it is estimated that the Federal share of total funding for capital outlay was 41.1 percent in 1997.

State governments directly spent $35.7 billion on highway capital outlay in 1997, which was partially financed by the $19.0 billion States received in grants from the Federal Government for highways. State government capital outlay is concentrated on the higher-order functional systems, and State direct expenditures comprise a majority of all capital outlay on each functional class except rural minor collectors, rural local, and urban local. Local governments control most of the mileage on these lower-ordered functional systems and make most of the capital improvements on them. [See Exhibit 6-12].

Exhibit 6-12. Highway Capital Outlay by Functional System, 1997

Total 1997 highway capital expenditures by all levels of government amounted to $5,914 per lane-mile and 1.9 cents per VMT. Capital outlay per lane mile was highest for the higher-ordered systems, and was higher on urban roads than rural roads. Capital outlay per VMT ranged from 1.3 cents on urban minor arterials, to 2.8 cents on rural other principal arterials, to 2.9 cents on rural and urban local. On a cents per VMT basis, capital outlay for rural roads is 12 percent higher than on urban roads.

Capital Outlay by Improvement Type

States provide detailed data on direct State capital outlay on arterials and collectors, classifying expenditures on each functional system into 17 improvement types. These capital improvement types are combined in this report into three major groupings, System Preservation, System Expansion, and System Enhancement. Exhibit 6-13 shows how the $32.1 billion of direct State expenditures on arterials and collectors were assigned to these categories.

The Federal Government and local governments spent an estimated $6.8 billion on arterials and collectors. Detailed data on these expenditures are not available, so the combined $38.9 billion of capital outlay on arterials and collectors by all levels of government, was classified based on the State government expenditure patterns.

There is little information available on the types of improvement that are being made with the $9.9 billion invested by all levels of government in 1997 on local functional class roads. For the purposes of developing an estimate for the improvement type breakdown for the total $48.7 billion invested in 1997 on all systems, it was assumed that the expenditure patterns on the local functional class were roughly equivalent to those observed for arterials and collectors.

In 1997 an estimated $23.2 billion was spent on system preservation, 47.6 percent of total capital outlay on all systems. System preservation as defined in this report does not include routine maintenance. An additional $26.3 billion was expended during 1997 on maintenance and traffic services.

An estimated $7.6 billion (15.6 percent) of total capital outlay went for new roads and bridges in 1997. An additional $14.0 billion (28.8 percent) is estimated to have been used to add lanes to existing roadways. Frequently, when roads are widened, the existing lanes are repaired and enhanced as well. The portion of widening projects estimated to be attributable to work on the existing lanes is not included as part of system expansion in this report.

Q   How are System Preservation, System Expansion, and System Enhancement defined?
A    System preservation consists of capital improvements on existing roads and bridges, intended to preserve the existing pavement and bridge infrastructure. This would include reconstruction, resurfacing, pavement restoration or rehabilitation, widening of narrow lanes or shoulders, bridge replacement, and bridge rehabilitation. Also included is the portion of widening projects estimated to be related to reconstructing or improving the existing lanes. System preservation does not include routine maintenance costs.

System Expansion includes the construction of new roads and new bridges, as well as those costs associated with adding lanes to existing roads. This includes all "New Construction," "New Bridge," "Major Widening," and most of the costs associated with "Reconstruction-Added Capacity," except for the portion of these expenditures estimated to be related to improving the existing lanes of a facility. As used in this report, "System Expansion" is the functional equivalent to "Capacity Expansion" used in the 1997 C&P report. The term was modified, because some system preservation and system enhancement improvements may result in added capacity, without adding new lanes.

System Enhancement is equivalent to the "Other Improvements" category used in the 1997 C&P report. It includes safety enhancements, traffic operations improvements such as the installation of intelligent transportation systems, and environmental enhancements.

Exhibit 6-13. Highway Capital Outlay by Improvement Type, 1997

Capital Outlay by Functional Class and Improvement Type

Exhibit 6-14 shows there are significant variations in the types of capital expenditures made by States on different functional classes. The portion of capital outlay devoted to system preservation ranges from 39.0 percent on "other urban freeways and expressways" to 62.8 percent on rural major collectors. System preservation's share is generally higher on rural arterials and collectors (52.9 percent) than on those in urban areas (43.7 percent). The portion of capital outlay used for construction of new roads and bridges is highest on rural other principal arterials, at 24.9 percent. The portion of capital outlay used for other system expansion is highest on urban other principal arterials (34.8 percent). On other arterials generally, other systems expansion's share of total capital outlay is 32.0 percent, higher than its share on Interstate (23.9 percent) and collectors (26.3 percent).

Exhibit 6-14. Distribution of Capital Outlay by Improvement Type and Functional Class, 1997

 

 
previous next
Page last modified on November 7, 2014
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000