U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Policy and Governmental Affairs

FHWA Home / Policy & Governmental Affairs / Conditions and Performance Report

Conditions and Performance Report

Conditions and Performance Report
Chapter 9—Impacts of Investment

Conditions and Performance Chapter Listing

Conditions and Performance Home Page


Introduction


Impact of Highway and Bridge Investment on Conditions and Performance

Transit Investment Impacts

Methods for Increasing Future Investment for Transportation Projects

 

Future Analyses of Spending Impacts

This is the second reporting cycle that has used TERM to model asset conditions and forecast investment needs. Several important modifications and additions have been made to TERM during its early development, and it is anticipated that many more such improvements will continue to be made in the future. Of particular interest would be additions to TERM that would allow a more complete analysis of investment impacts. For example, it would be helpful to be able to quantify the year-to-year performance improvements that are made and changes in conditions that occur over the analysis period. Another effort will be made to incorporate demand elasticity into PMT growth, and to allow for some degree of interaction between the HERS and TERM models. One additional effort currently underway is to adapt TERM to allow for annual spending caps to be imposed. This would allow for an analysis of how asset conditions would change if funding levels were held at some particular value (such as current spending).

Q   Why haven't transit conditions and performance diminished substantially if there has been a capital investment gap?
A   There are several possible reasons for this. One is the simple fact that the investment requirements are forward-looking, rather than historical. Their intention is to forecast future investment needs, rather than to describe past patterns of investment and its impact. As a result, while past and current spending levels may be sufficient to have maintained the condition and performance levels currently observed, they may not be adequate to continue to do so in the future.

It is also possible, as surmised in the highway section of this chapter, that recent investments have provided short-term maintenance fixes while larger, more expensive replacement needs have simply been deferred to the future. TEA-21 attempts to address this possibility by eliminating most operating costs from eligibility for Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula funding in large cities (i.e., urbanized areas over 200,000 in population), while specifically allowing preventative maintenance costs as an eligible expense. It is hoped that this change may result in a more-optimal allocation of capital funds by transit agencies.

Another possibility for the perceived insensitivity of conditions to the funding gap is that capital funds have been sufficient to cover pure rehabilitation and replacement needs, while not allowing for capacity expansion to maintain current performance levels. However, this assumes that all capital funds are being used on rehab and replacement. In actuality, much of this funding has gone toward new vehicles for system expansion and new, performance-improving rail systems. The performance measures have also stayed relatively constant.

Two features of the data and modeling in TERM should also be noted. First, for many transit systems, increases in vehicle utilization may be a sign of improved system efficiency, rather than a stress on system capacity. If current vehicles are being underutilized (as may especially be the case for new rail systems in their start-up periods), then there will be excess capacity in the system, and travel growth can easily be handled by existing assets, so long as they are properly rehabilitated and replaced. Second, the Rehabilitation and Replacement module in TERM (see Appendix I) invests sufficient amounts to maintain conditions on the existing asset base. As new assets for system expansion are purchased, the average condition of all assets will increase, even if the condition of existing assets remains constant. Some of this may be reflected in the stability of bus vehicle conditions even as investment appears to be inadequate to do so.

previous next
Page last modified on November 7, 2014
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000