Skip to contentUnited States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home
Research Home   |   Pavements Home
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-12-023
Date: December 2012

 

Simplified Techniques for Evaluation and Interpretation of Pavement Deflections for Network-Level Analysis

REFERENCES

  1. Federal Highway Administration. How to Get LTPP Data, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/research/tfhrc/programs/infrastructure/pavements/ltpp/getdata.cfm.

  2. Strategic Highway Research Program. (1993). Manual for FWD Testing in the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program, 9, Report No. SHRP-P-661, Version 2.0, National Research Council, Washington, DC.

  3. California Department of Transportation. (1979). "Test to Determine Overlay and Maintenance Requirements by Pavement Deflection Measurements," Caltrans Test Method No. 356, Sacramento, CA.

  4. Stubstad, R., Jiang, Y.J., Clevenson, M.L., and Lukanen, E.O. (2006). Review of the LTPP Backcalculation Results, Report No. FHWA-HRT-05-150, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  5. Kim, Y.R. (2000). "Assessing Pavement Layer Condition Using Deflection Data," National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 10-48, Final Report, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  6. Lukanen, E.O., Stubstad, R., and Briggs, R. (2000). Temperature Predictions and Adjustment Factors for Asphalt Pavement, Report No. FHWA-RD-98-085, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  7. Hossain, M., Chowdhury, T., Chitrapu, S., and Gisi, A.J. (2000). "Network-Level Pavement Deflection Testing and Structural Evaluation," Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 28(3), 199-206.

  8. AASHTO. (1993). Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  9. Ullidtz, P. (1998). Modeling Flexible Pavement Response and Performance, Polyteknisk Forlag, Lyngby, Denmark.

  10. Scullion, T. (1988). Incorporating a Structural Strength Index into the Texas Pavement Evaluation System, Report No. FHWA/TX-88/409-3F, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  11. Perrone, E., Dossey, T., and Hudson, W.R. (1994). Network-Level Deflection Data Collection for Rigid Pavement, Interim Report, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX.

  12. Diefenderfer, B.K. (2008). Network-Level Pavement Evaluation of Virginia’s Interstate System Using the Falling Weight Deflectometer, Report VTRC 08-R18, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA.

  13. Ferne, B.W. (1997). Use of Deflections at Network Level in England for Programming and Other Purposes, Cost 336 Workshop at National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.

  14. Horak, E. (2008). "Benchmarking the Structural Condition of Flexible Pavements with Deflection Bowl Parameters," Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 50(2), 2-9.

  15. Sapkota, B. (2003). Use of FWD in the Network Level Pavement Condition Survey, Presented at the 12th Annual FWD Users Group Meeting, Wichita, KS.

  16. Ferne, B., Sinhal, R., and Fairclough, R. (2009). Structural Assessment of the English Strategic Road Network- Latest Developments, Proceedings from the Eighth International Conference on Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways, and Airfields, Champaign, IL.

  17. Zhang, Z., Claros, G., Manuel, L., and Damnjanovic, I. (2003). "Development of Structural Condition Index to Support Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decisions at Network Level," Transportation Research Record 1827, 10-17, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  18. Zhang, Z., Manuel, L., Damnjanovic, I., and Li, Z. (2003). Development of a New Methodology for Characterizing Pavement Structural Condition for Network-Level Applications, Report No. FHWA/TX-04/0-4322-1, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  19. AASHTO. (1998). AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures: Part II-Rigid Pavement Design and Rigid Pavement Joint Design, 4th Edition, Supplement, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.

  20. Virginia Department of Transportation. (1992). The Pavement Subsystem User Manual for the Highway and Traffic Records Information System (HTRIS), Richmond, VA.

  21. Chang, J-R., Lin, J-D., Chung, W-C., and Chen, D-H. (2002). "Evaluating the Structural Strength of Flexible Pavements in Taiwan Using the Falling Weight Deflectometer," International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3(3), 131-141.

  22. Ullidtz, P. and Stubstad, R. (1996-1997). ELMOD Users Guide, Dynatest International A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  23. Carvalho, R.L., Ayres, M., Shirazi, H., Selezneva, O., and Darter, M. (2011). Impact of Design Features on Pavement Response and Performance in Rehabilitated Flexible and Rigid Pavements, Report No. FHWA-HRT-10-066, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  24. Airport Cooperative Research Program. (2008). ACRP Report 3-Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Areas, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  25. Hosmer, D. and Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

  26. Fawcett, T. (2006). "An Introduction to ROC Analysis," Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, 861-874.

  27. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2004). Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, NCHRP Project 1-37A, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  28. Huang, Y.H. (2004). Pavement Analysis and Design, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.

  29. Kestler, M., Harr, M.E., Berg, R.L., and Johnson, D.M. (1994). Spacial Variability of Falling Weight Deflectometer Data: A Geostatistical Analysis, 318-330, Fourth International Conference on Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways, and Airfields, Minneapolis, MN.

  30. Baladi, G., Dawson, T., and Sessions, C. (2009). Pavement Subgrade MR Design Values for Michigan’s Seasonal Changes, Report No. RC-1531, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI.

  31. Arambula, E., George, R., Xiong, W., and Hall, G. (2011). Development and Validation of Pavement Performance Models for the State of Maryland, Transportation Research Board 2011 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  32. FHWA. (2011). Results of Long-Term Pavement Performance SPS-3 Analysis: Preventive Maintenance of Flexible Pavements, TechBrief No. FHWA-HRT-11-049, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  33. Strategic Higway Research Program. (1993). Strategic Highway Research Program and Traffic Safety on Two Continents, Conference Proceedings, Gothenburg, Sweden.

  34. Baus, R.L., Pierce, C., and Hong, W. (2001). Feasibility of Including Structural Adequacy Index as an Indicator of Overall Pavement Quality in the SCDOT Pavement Management System, Summary Report, Report No. FHWA-SC-01-03, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  35. Killingsworth, B. and Von Quintus, H. (1997). Backcalculation of Layer Moduli of LTPP General Pavement Study (GPS) Sites, Report No. FHWA-RD-97-086, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  36. Collop, A.C., Armitage, R.J., and Thom, N.H. (2001). "Assessing Variability of In Situ Pavement Material Stiffness Moduli," Journal of Transportation Engineering, 127(1), 74-81, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  37. Eijbersen M.J. and Van Zwieten J. (1998). Application of FWD Measurements at the Network Level, 1, 438-450, 4th International Conference on Managing Pavements,
    Pretoria, South Africa.

  38. Piyatrapoomi, N., Kumar, A., Robertson, N., and Weligamage, J. (2004). Reliability of Optimal Intervals for Pavement Strength Data Collection at the Network Level, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Managing Pavements, Brisbane, Australia.

  39. Piyatrapoomi, N., Kumar, A., Robertson, N., and Weligamage, J. (2003). A Probability-Based Analysis for Identifying Pavement Deflection Test Intervals for Road Data Collection, 291-302, Proceedings of the International Conference on Highway Pavement Data Analysis and Mechanistic Design Application, Columbus, OH.

  40. Howard, K.R. and Tongue, F.T. (1995). "Pavement Management-Development of a Pilot PMS," Highways and Transportation, 25-27, London, UK.

  41. Litzka, J., Leben, B., La Torre, F., Weninger-Vycudil, A., Antunes, M.L., Kokot, D., Mladenovic, G., Brittain, S., and Viner, H. (2008). The Way Forward for Pavement Performance Indicators Across Europe, Final Report, COST Action 354: Performance Indicators for Road Pavements, COST, Brussels, Belgium.

  42. COST. (1998). COST 336: Use of Falling Weight Deflectometers in Pavement Evaluation, COST, Brussels, Belgium. Obtained from: http://cordis.europa.eu/cost-transport/src/cost-336.htm.

  43. Austroads. (2003). Comparison of Project-Level and Network-Level Pavement Strength Assessment, Publication No. AP-T21/03, Sydney, Australia.

  44. Haas, R., Hudson, W.R., and Zaniewski, J. (1994), Modern Pavement Management, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL.

 


The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation and is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with field offices across the United States. is a major agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation and is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with field offices across the United States. is a major agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). Provide leadership and technology for the delivery of long life pavements that meet our customers needs and are safe, cost effective, and can be effectively maintained. Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) R&T Web site portal, which provides access to or information about the Agency’s R&T program, projects, partnerships, publications, and results.
FHWA
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration