About
FHWA Organization
Headquarters Offices
Field Offices
Careers
Business Opportunities
Staff Directories
Highway History
Programs
Acquisition Management
Civil Rights
Federal Lands Highway
Infrastructure
Innovative Program Delivery
Operations
Planning, Environment, and Realty
Policy
Research, Development & Technology
Safety
Browse by Topics
Resources
Core Highway Topics
Federal-Aid Essentials
Automation
Publications & Statistics
Laws & Regulations
Policy & Guidance Center
Section 508
Professional Development
National Highway Institute (NHI)
Resource Center
Accessibility Resource Library
FHWA Research Library
Briefing Room
Press Releases
Speeches & Testimony
Photos
Videos
Media Contacts
Contact
Search FHWA
Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (
HEP
)
Planning
Environment
Real Estate
HEP
Events
Guidance
Publications
Glossary
Awards
Contacts
About TMIP
TMIP Annual Reports
TMIP Mission and Goals
TMIP Strategic Plan
TMIP Community
TMIP-L Email List
Webinars
Resources
Peer Review Program
TMIP Toolbox
Training
Publications
TMIP Annual Reports
Other Reports
Contacts
For more information, please contact:
Sarah Sun
Brian Gardner
FHWA
→
Planning
→
TMIP
→
Resources
→
Peer Review Program
→
BKR
City of Bellevue, City of Kirkland, City of Redmond (BKR) Peer Review
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Disclaimer
1.2 Acknowledgments
1.3 Report Purpose
1.4 Report Organization
2.0 Overview of the City of Bellevue, City of Kirkland, and City of Redmond (BKR) Model
2.1 BKR Model Background
2.2 Regional Characteristics
3.0 Expectations of a New BKR Model
3.1 Existing Model
3.2 Future Model Update
3.3 Goals for the Current Peer Review
4.0 Peer Review Discussion
4.1 Review of Model Design Plan
4.1.1 TAZ System and BKR Model Regional Boundary
4.1.2 Land-Use and Sociodemographic Data
4.1.3 Bicycle Network and Assignment
4.1.4 Transit Modeling
4.1.5 Highway Network and Assignment
4.1.6 Multimodal Accessibility Measures
4.1.7 Auto Ownership Model
4.1.8 Home-Based Trip Purposes
4.1.9 Mode Choice
4.1.10 Trip Distribution
4.1.11 Number of Time Periods
4.1.12 Hybrid Modeling Approach
4.1.13 Interfacing with PSRC’s ABM
4.2 Concerns and Benefits of Adopting PSRC’s Activity-Based Model
4.2.1 Simulation Variation
4.2.2 Run Times
4.2.3 Model Complexity
4.2.4 Benefits of Adopting PSRC’s ABM
5.0 Peer Review Panel Recommendations
5.1 Stand-Alone Enhanced/Hybrid Trip-Based Model
5.2 Incrementally Add Components to Existing Trip-Based Model
5.3 Adopt PSRC’s ABM
5.4 Other Recommendations and Next Steps
Appendix A List of Peer Review Panel Participants
A.1 Peer Review Panel Members
A.2 BKR and Affiliated Agency Staff
A.3 TMIP Peer Review Support Staff
Appendix B Peer Review Panel Meeting Agenda
Appendix C Peer Review Panel Member Biographies
C.1 Billy Charlton, Puget Sound Regional Council
C.2 Bud Reiff, Portland Metro
C.3 Joe Castiglione, San Francisco County Transportation Authority
C.4 Ken Lindmark, City of Calgary
C.5 Kyung-Hwa Kim, Atlanta Regional Council
Appendix D Documentation Provided to Panel Members by the City of Bellevue and Documents Referenced in this Report
List of Figures
Figure 1 City of Bellevue, City of Kirkland, and City of Redmond Regional Boundary
Figure 2 Proposed BKR Model TAZ system
Top
<<
< Prev
Contents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Next >
>>
Updated: 5/23/2017
HEP Home
Planning
Environment
Real Estate