Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram
Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
HEP Events Guidance Publications Glossary Awards Contacts

Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization (FMPO) Peer Review

5.0 Peer Review Panel Recommendations

This section summarizes the recommendations of the panel.

5.1 Model Assessment

There were several aspects of the FMPO modeling and planning process that the panel approved of; however, the panel concluded that the model required extensive changes to be brought up to the state of the practice and to be useful in the TIA process. The panel recommendations were made with a particular mind to achieving the following goals expressed by FMPO during the peer review meeting:

The following sections summarize the panel recommendations from the previous section by priority. Priority was determined according to the relative effort and benefit of each item. In addition to the recommendations listed below, the panel recommended that FMPO review published guidelines, such as NCHRP Report 765: Analytical Travel Forecasting Approaches for Project-Level Planning and Design, and peer models like Parkersburg, WV-OH for examples of solid, four-step models that are feasible for FMPO to implement and maintain and are appropriate to support project-level travel forecasting. The panel emphasized that regional models are not appropriate for direct project-level forecast use and that operational model should be used instead. Moreover, in order for regional model outputs to be used as reference, the model must be well validated and the outputs used used with great caution.

5.1.1 High Priority Model Improvements

The high-priority model suggestions include fairly extensive changes throughout all components of the model. Given that FMPO has only one full-time modeler on staff, the panel assumed that consulting resources would be used to complete the recommendations. The estimated cost of such a model update would be about $80-120K and take about one year.

5.1.2 Medium Priority Model Improvements

The medium priority improvements suggested are those that the panel would like to see implemented, but are not as critical for FMPO's needs.

5.1.1 Low Priority Model Improvements

Low priority model improvements are included as things that FMPO should keep in mind through future model development.

5.2 Model Integration with the TIA Process

The model recommendations above were made with the intention of making the model outputs more suited to use in a TIA process. This section summarizes the post-processing and ways to utilize the model outputs in a TIA.

5.2.1 Post Processing

5.2.2 Model uses in TIA

Updated: 5/23/2017
HEP Home Planning Environment Real Estate
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000