Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram
Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
HEP Events Guidance Publications Glossary Awards Contacts

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana (OKI) Regional Council of Governments Peer Review Report

3.0 Development of the OKI Model

3.1 Introduction

The OKI model includes two MPOs, the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC) and OKI, spanning eleven counties: seven in Ohio, three in Kentucky, and one in Indiana. The program runs on Cube Voyager and custom programs, most of which are run through FORTRAN. Figure 1: OKI Modeling Areaprovides an illustration of the modeling area. Table 1: OKI Model Statistics provides a basic model statistical summary.

Figure 1: OKI Modeling Area

Title: Figure 1: OKI Modeling Area - Description: The figure provides a map that illustrates the OKI modeling area. In the north, there are three counties in the model that fall under the jurisdiction of the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission. In the southern portion of the modeling area are the eight counties that fall under OKI's jurisdiction.

Table 1: OKI Model Statistics

Model Characteristic

Statistics

Population (2010)

OKI: 1,999,474

MVRPC: 823,257

TOTAL: 2,822,731

Households (2010)

OKI: 781,953

MVRPC: 327,630

TOTAL: 1,109,583

Lane-Miles of Roads (OKI)

6,555

Traffic Analysis Zones (Model)

OKI: 2,067

MVRPC: 890

Externals: 106

Total: 3,063

Traffic Analysis Zones (OKI)

2,299 (includes 232 expansion zones)

The OKI model was created in 1968 and first applied in 1971. The following list provides a timeline of the OKI model's development and enhancement. It also includes various factors that have influenced the model building environment:

The model is applied to a variety of study types, such as bridge and toll diversion analysis; rail and streetcar corridor analysis; long range transportation planning, specifically 2004 and 2008 regional plans; express and local bus planning for four different transit operators, Metro, Tank, Clermont, and Dayton; and attainment estimation for ozone and fine particulates.

OKI was the first MPO to implement the Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) and has also collaborated with FHWA to apply the Surface Transportation Efficiency Analysis Model (STEAM) for economic analysis of large transportation projects.

3.2 Existing Transportation Model

In the existing structure, OKI runs a modified trip-based model. This model performs a household classification process that provides input to trip generation estimation by wealth classes based on the number of workers per household compared to the number of vehicles (for home-based work trips) or the number of people in the household compared to the number of vehicles (for home-based other trips). The distribution is an un-stratified gravity model. Mode choice is a nested-logit process that is based on wealth classes. Assignment is a bi-conjugate equilibrium assignment. The model performs a feedback procedure for trip distribution and mode choice by time of day.

Prior to the OKI peer review, the OKI model applied 1995 household and transit surveys and validated to 2005 traffic counts and transit ridership. By the time of the peer review in spring 2014, OKI calibrated the model using 2010 household and transit on-board surveys combined with data from the 2010 decennial census and 2005-2010 American Community Survey (ACS). In the last five years, OKI also has collected a massive number of traffic counts and has enhanced the highway network file to include more variables. Additionally, OKI has improved model output reports and streamlined the model process.

OKI is currently working with the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) to develop an activity-based model, using the Coordinated Travel - Regional Activity-Based Modeling Platform (CT-RAMP).This development is expected to take at least until June of 2015.

3.3 Previous Peer Reviews

As referenced in Section 3.1, OKI has conducted three other peer reviews in the past. The first peer review was in 1996 to assess the then-current TDFM in view of the regulations and policies established by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). Two years later in 1998, the panel was reconvened to review progress and provide suggestions for model use in then-active transportation studies. The third peer review panel was convened in 2003 to comment on several factors surrounding the model's adequacy and consistency with the state of the practice. Several recommendations from the 2003 peer review have been completed or have been investigated prior to this peer review. Table 2 summarizes the status of those items.

Table 2: Status of 2003 Model Peer Review Action Items
Action Item Completed Definite TODO in2010 Trip BasedModel Investigate in 2010Trip Model Tour Based Model Being Monitored Unclear
Melding OKI and MVRPC into one model X          
Further analysis of the consistency of highway and transit path building parameters vis-a-vis the utility functions     X X    
The factors used in the trip generation functions   X        
The use of significant k-factors     X      
Mode choice constants in submodes and transit system specific factors     X X    
The use of passenger car equivalents for trucks in the assignment process X          
Allowing the area type designations used in various portions of the model to vary over time X          
Worker productivity factors used in the truck model were noted as they may over-state growth.         X  
Tour based models       X    
Incorporating land use factors into the forecasting process           X
Generating person trips by all modes   X        
Incorporating a density measure in the modal utility functions     X X    
Use of a destination choice model rather than a gravity model     X X    
Use of significantly more graphics in the analysis and presentation of model forecasts   X   X    
Development of an auto ownership model     X X    
Income based market stratification in distribution and mode choice     X X    
More detailed demographic and employment data   X        
Consideration of household life-cycle based generation models       X    

3.4 OKI's Goals for the Current Peer Review

OKI identified three reasons for the peer review in their application. First was to reaffirm that the current trip-based model structure, procedures, and results meet the needs of the agency. In areas where the need is not met, OKI requested the suggestion of short term improvements. Second, OKI requested that the panelists identify any improvements that can be quickly implemented utilizing data or data that can be easily collected. Finally, the OKI staff sought guidance on their effort to transition to a tour-based model. The tour-based model is targeted for summer of 2015, but it is expected that both the trip-based and tour-based models will run parallel for a couple of years. OKI emphasized the importance of ensuring that the trip-based model meet the needs of regional transportation planning activities and the key projects until the transition is complete.

At the time of the peer review, OKI identified the following additional areas of priority for the panel to address:

Updated: 6/28/2017
HEP Home Planning Environment Real Estate
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000