U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
REPORT |
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information |
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-20-044 Date: July 2021 |
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-20-044 Date: July 2021 |
PDF Version (624 KB)
Technical Report Documentation Page
1. Report No.
FHWA-HRT-20-044 |
2. Government Accession No. | 3 Recipient's Catalog No. | ||
4. Title and Subtitle
FHWA Research and Technology Evaluation: eNEPA |
5. Report Date
July 2021 |
|||
6. Performing Organization Code | ||||
7. Author(s)
Gina Filosa |
8. Performing Organization Report No. DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-19-22 |
|||
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, OST-R |
10. Work Unit No. | |||
11. Contract or Grant No.
HW9AA2 |
||||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address
Office of Corporate Research, Technology, andInnovation Management |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered
Final Report; April 2015–May 2019 |
|||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code
HRTM-10 |
||||
15. Supplementary Notes
The Research and Technology Program Manager and Contracting Officer's Representative for this report was John Moulden (HRTM-10). |
||||
16. Abstract
This report evaluates the use of eNEPA, particularly the use by State departments of transportation (DOTs) and other transportation stakeholders. The evaluation team collected information on the breadth and depth of eNEPA use, usability of eNEPA, and effectiveness of eNEPA at reducing projects' environmental-review timeline and improving timing, quantity, and quality of interagency collaboration in developing environmental documents. Data collected through a literature review and stakeholder interviews suggest that eNEPA 2.0 has not been in use long enough for users to realize its full benefits. State DOTs have primarily used eNEPA's document-manager and file-sharing functions and have not fully applied eNEPA for project reviews. By focusing its outreach and education on those State DOTs that can most benefit from using the tool, FHWA can continue to increase the adoption and use of eNEPA. While eNEPA may not ever be widely used by State DOTs, the more State DOTs use the tool, and therefore build their comfort with and expertise in using it, the more benefits they are likely to experience. |
||||
17. Key Words
eNEPA, environmental review |
18. Distribution Statement
No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. |
|||
19. Security Classification (of this report) Unclassified |
20. Security Classification (of this page) Unclassified |
21. No. of Pages
36 |
22. Price
N/A |
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) | Reproduction of completed page authorized |