U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-04-097
Date: August 2007

Measured Variability Of Southern Yellow Pine - Manual for LS-DYNA Wood Material Model 143

PDF Version (2.92 MB)

PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®


1. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Version 960, Volumes 1 and 2, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA, 2001.
2. Murray, Y.D., and J.D. Reid, et al., Evaluation of LS-DYNA Wood Material Model 143, Report No. FHWA-HRT-04-096, Federal Highway Administration, 2004.
3. Lewis, B.A., Manual for LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147, Report No. FHWA-HRT-04-095, Federal Highway Administration, 2004.
4. Reid, J.D., B.A. Coon, B.A. Lewis, S.H. Sutherland, and Y.D. Murray, Evaluation of LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147, Report No. FHWA-HRT-04-094, Federal Highway Administration, 2004.
5. LS-DYNA User’s Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA, 1997.
6. Cramer, S.M., and W.B. Fohrell, “Method for Simulating Tension Performance of Lumber Members,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 10, October 1990, pp. 2729–2747, figure 1, p. 2731.
7. Goodman, James R., and Jozsef Bodig, “Orthotropic Strength of Wood in Compression,” Wood Science, Vol. 4, No. 2, October 1971, pp. 83–94, figure 6, p. 89; figure 9, p. 92.
8. Stanzl-Tschegg, S.E., D.M. Tan, and E.K. Tschegg, “Fracture Resistance to the Crack Propagation in Wood,” International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 75, 1996, pp. 347-356, figure 1, p. 349, figure 3, p. 350.
9. Kretschmann, D.E., General Engineers, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. The Results from Trial of the CEN Draft Standard to Determine Fracture Energy for Tension Perpendicular to the Grain on Southern Pine. Investigates the proposed CIB W18A standards. Testing results presented at the 1990 meeting of CIB-W18A, figure 1, p. 11, figure 3, p. 15.
10. Rohde, John, and John Reid, “Evaluation of the Performance Criteria for Wood Posts in Strong-Post W-Beam Guardrail,” TRB Paper 97-1206, Transportation Research Board, January 1997.
11. Reid, S.R., and C. Peng, “Dynamic Uniaxial Crushing of Wood,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 19, Nos. 5-6, 1997, pp. 531–570, figure 7, p. 545, figure 14, p. 560.
12. Cramer, S.M., and J.R. Goodman, “Failure Modeling: A Basis for Strength Prediction of Lumber,” Wood and Fiber Science, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1986, pp. 446–459, figure 4, p. 452.
13. Green, D.W., and D.E. Kretschmann, “Moisture Content and the Properties of Clear Southern Pine,” Research Paper FPL-RP-531, Forest Products Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1994.
14. Kretschmann, D.E., and David W. Green, “Modeling Moisture Content-Mechanical Property Relationships for Clear Southern Pine,” Wood and Fiber Science, 28(3), 1996, pp. 320–337.
15. McBurney, R.S., and J.T. Drow, “The Elastic Properties of Wood―Young’s Moduli and Poisson’s Ratios of Douglas Fir and Their Relations to Moisture Content,” No. 1528-D, Forest Products Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, March 1956.
16. Bodig, J., and B.A. Jayne, Mechanics of Wood and Wood Composites, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL, 1993, figure 313, p. 119, figure 7.32, p. 312, figure 11.28, p. 576.
17. Woodward, Clinton, and John Minor, “Failure Theories for Douglas Fir in Tension,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 114, No. 12, December 1988, pp. 2808-2813.
18. Forest Products Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material, Agriculture Handbook 72, figure 4-14, p. 4–36.
19. Patton-Mallory, Marcia, Steven M. Cramer, Frederick W. Smith, and Patrick J. Pellicane, “Nonlinear Material Models for Analysis of Bolted Wood Connections,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 8, August 1997, pp. 1063–1070.
20. Sandler, I., F.L. DiMaggio, and M.L. Barron, “An Extension of the Cap Model Inclusion of Pore Pressure Effects and Kinematic Hardening to Represent an Anisotropic Wet Clay,” in C.S. Desai and R.H. Gallagher, Mechanics of Engineering Materials, Chapter 28, Wiley, New York, NY, 1984.
21. Simo, J.C., and J.W. Ju, “Stress- and Strain-Based Continuum Damage Models, Parts I and II,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 23, No. 7, 1987.
22. Sih, G.C., P.C. Paris, and G.R. Irwin, “On Cracks in Rectilinearly Anisotropic Bodies,” International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 1, No. 3, September 1965, pp. 189–203.
23. Bragov, A., and A.K. Lomunov, “Dynamic Properties of Some Wood Species,” Journal de Physique IV France 7, Colloque C3, Supplement au Journal de Physique III d’août [Journal of Physics IV France 7, C3 Conference, Supplement to the Journal of Physiques III for August], 1997, figure 1, p. C3-490.
24. Murray, Y.D., “Modeling Rate Effects in Rock and Concrete,” Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on the Interaction of the Effects of Munitions With Structures, Defense Special Weapons Agency, McLean, VA, April 1997.
25. Duvaut, G., and J.L. Lions, “Les Inequations en Mechanique et en Physique” [Equations in Mechanics and in Physics], Dunod, Paris, France, 1972.
26. Standard Grading Rules for Southern Pine Lumber, Southern Pine Inspection Bureau, Pensacola, FL, 1991.
27. Hashin, Z., “Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites,” Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 47, June 1980, pp. 329–334.
28. Nahas, Mahmoud N., “Survey of Failure and Post-Failure Theories of Laminated Fiber-Reinforced Composites,” Journal of Composites Technology and Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, Winter 1986, pp. 138-153.
29. Tsai, Stephen W., and Edward M. Wu, “A General Theory of Strength for Anisotropic Materials,” Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 5, January 1971, pp. 58–80.
30. Hill, R. The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1950.
31. Hoffman, O., “The Brittle Strength of Orthotropic Materials,” Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 1, 1967, pp. 200–206.
32. Tsai, Stephen W., and Victor D. Azzi, “Strength of Laminated Composite Materials,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, February 1966, pp. 296–301.
33. Yamada, S.E., and C.T. Sun, “Analysis of Laminate Strength and Its Distribution,” Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 12, July 1978, pp. 275–284.
34. Hankinson, R.L., “Investigation of Crushing Strength at Varying Angles of Grain,” Air Service Information Circular 3(259), Material Section Paper No. 130, 1921.
35. Sandler, I.S., and T.A. Pucik, “Non-Uniqueness in Dynamic Rate-Independent Non-Associated Plasticity,” Mechanics of Materials and Structures, Elsevier Science, 1994, pp. 221–239.


Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101