U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Skip to content

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-07-042
Date: April 2007

Maintaining Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity: Impacts on State and Local Agencies

PDF Version (413 KB)

PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®

Appendix B - Summary of Reported Impacts

Agency/Location Reported Impacts Comments Implications
NCHRP 346 (7)
  • Low level criteria will have minor impact over a 10 year implementation.
  • Many agencies have implemented sign management processes.
  • Cost model can be useful to assess impacts over differing sign system conditions.
  • The low level criteria evaluated used values similar to those most recently proposed.
  • The cost factors used in the analysis reflect costs for that time period.
  • Some costs have gone down, few materials included.
  • Based upon a broadly gathered sample of signs.
  • Overhead and street name signs not addressed.
  • Minor impact conclusion.
  • Concluded that impact costs should not include process improvement costs.
  • Supports long term implementation to minimize costs to agencies.
  • Cites need for research on field methods, degradation rates, and liability issues.
USDOT Highway Safety Evaluations (14)
  • Sign projects are among the highest payoff safety projects based upon evaluation reports submitted between 1978 and 1996.
  • B/C ratio for sign projects 22.4 to 1.
  • Conclusions based upon several years of data, but reporting process was not uniform.
  • The data does not isolate the nature of sign improvements, so the relation to nighttime visibility cannot be determined.
  • Evidence that improved signing reduces crashes leading to a highly positive safety benefit.
Texas DOT (8)
  • Texas DOT sign crews reviewing 50 signs in training program suggested replacement of more signs than might be necessary under the proposed FHWA minimum requirements.
  • Findings raised questions about the appropriateness of the contrast ratio aspect of the requirements.
  • The AASHTO Task Force participated in these exercises and similarly found the need to replace about three times more signs than would needed to satisfy the minimum levels.
  • Usefulness of the visual inspections method led to the proposal that agencies be allowed to use it instead of measurement methods.
  • TF agreed that it may be appropriate to alter the contrast criteria.
  • The results suggest that the minimum values will not affect agencies as much as might be expected.
  • The field exercises demonstrated the value of night inspections to find a multitude of possible problems that adversely affect night visibility.
FHWA Impacts Report (5)
  • Nineteen agencies provided feedback on survey about sign management efforts in State & local agencies.
  • They provided feedback on the expected impacts of the new requirements.
  • Seven of these agencies provided data for a sample of their signs that was used to estimate overall impacts.
  • Estimates of the impact led to the conclusion that the requirement would not have major impacts if implemented over a long period.
  • Impacts analyses based upon estimates of the number of signs based on a small sample.
  • The sample was obtained from agencies who volunteered to provide the data leading to possible bias.
  • The minimum levels considered were similar to the most recently proposed levels.
  • Survey feedback indicated a widespread range of perceived impacts and highly variable costs.
  • This study added evidence that the impacts of the requirements would be minor.
  • The range of perceived costs is great. Efforts may be needed to assist agencies in estimating more specifically their costs.
Indiana DOT (9)
  • Retroreflectivity was field measured for a sample of signs in five parts of the State.
  • Data indicated that more than 90% of the signs met or exceeded the minimum levels proposed by FHWA in 1998.
  • Data analysis found no effect for cleaning of signs before measurement and no effect associated with differences in environmental factors in different parts of the State.
  • Recommendation to the State to increase the replacement cycle for all but stop signs to 12 years.
  • The data collection did follow ASTM procedures, but it is not believed that this had an impact on the conclusions.
  • The agency only uses Type II material, so the results are less generally applicable.
  • Impacts of new requirements considered low.
  • Good example of how data can be used to justify extending replacement cycle.
  • Useful insights on wiping effects that can be included in the procedures.
Mendocino, CA (15)
  • Road safety reviews which focused on sign and markings led to crash reductions savings in excess of $11 million.
  • B/C ratio of 1:159 reported.
  • Program cost were approximately $160,000, but calculated crash savings ranged from $12.8 to $23.7 million.
  • This study relied on CHP data which covered a ten year period.
  • There was a limited number of sections, but the safety experience of State roads in the area were used as a control.
  • The effects of signing and marking improvements was not isolated.
  • Some skepticism is needed relative to the order of magnitude of the benefits, but it there would seem to be ample evidence of the value of good delineation and signing.
  • Detailed of the review process and reasons for 3 year frequency should be pursued.
North Carolina DOT (11)
  • The agency undertook an extensive analysis of current sign practices and options available.
  • It was estimated that there are over 3.2 million signs on the streets and highways in the States.
  • Estimates of sign condition were generated from sample studies. Less than 10% of the State’s signs were believed to be below the minimum levels.
  • The State already conducts regular night sign inspections.
  • After considering a broad range of alternatives, it was recommended that the State undertake a comprehensive sign inventory and develop a full-function SIMS. Price over $4 million.
  • The report contains a good summary of information on sign inventory and management systems.
  • A lot of options considered in the development of NCDOT strategy.
  • Useful critiques of estimating tools.
  • Good long-term life-cycle cost analyses.
  • Recommendations suggest a large impact on the State, but the bulk of the costs are associated with putting a comprehensive SIMS in place.
  • Less than 10% of their signs estimated to need replacement.

Previous | Next

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101