U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
|This techbrief is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information|
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-09-056
Date: October 2009
Displaced Left-Turn Interchange
FHWA Contact: Joe Bared,
PDF Version (1.6 MB)
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®
This document is a technical summary of the Federal Highway Administration report, Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Information Report (AIIR) (FHWA-HRT-09-060).
Today's transportation professionals, with limited resources available to them, are challenged to meet the mobility needs of an increasing population. At many highway junctions, congestion continues to worsen, and drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists experience increasing delays and heightened exposure to risk. Today's traffic volumes and travel demands often lead to safety problems that are too complex for conventional interchange designs to properly handle. Consequently, more engineers are considering various innovative treatments as they seek solutions to these complex problems.
The corresponding technical report, Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR) (FHWA-HRT-09-060), covers four intersection designs and two interchange designs that offer substantial advantages over conventional at-grade intersections and grade-separated diamond interchanges. The AIIR provides information on each alternative treatment covering salient geometric design features, operational and safety issues, access management, costs, construction sequencing, environmental benefits, and applicability. This TechBrief summarizes information on one of these alternative interchange designs-the displaced left-turn (DLT) interchange (see figure 1). In the figure, the red circle indicates a signal-controlled crossover; the purple circle indicates a signal-controlled main intersection; the orange arrows indicate vehicular crossover movement; and the yellow arrow indicates opposing through movement at the signal-controlled crossover.
The DLT interchange is a new interchange design that has similarities to both the at-grade DLT intersection and the double crossover diamond (DCD) interchange. The main feature of the DLT interchange is that left-turning traffic crosses over the opposing through lanes several hundred feet upstream of the main intersection and then proceeds on a new roadway situated between the opposing through lanes and a roadway that carries right-turning traffic from the ramp. From this new roadway, the left-turn traffic completes its maneuver onto the on-ramp.
A DLT interchange has four signalized junctions: two at the crossovers for the DLT movements and two at the ramp terminals of the interchange. The DLT interchange design reduces the number of phases at the signal-controlled ramp terminals within the interchange from three to two, thereby reducing delays to drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists as they pass through the interchange area. To ensure the smooth progression of traffic, all four signalized junctions are operated in a coordinated system. A DLT interchange has the same number of conflict points as a conventional diamond interchange. However, fewer angle crashes may be anticipated in a DLT interchange compared with a conventional interchange because conflicts are more separated.
The primary design elements of a DLT interchange (see figure 2) are as follows:
Traffic Signal Control
A DLT interchange typically has traffic signals at each of the
two left-turn crossovers and at each of the two ramp intersections.
Signal control at each of these four junctions operate with just
two phases for the alternative conflicting movements and are
coordinated to maintain progression on the arterial road. Traffic
signals at a DLT interchange are fully actuated to minimize
The traffic simulation software VISSIM was used to compare the operational performance of a DLT interchange design to a conventional diamond interchange design. Two geometric design cases of DLT and conventional interchanges were simulated using variations of traffic flow scenarios. Some of the important results of the analysis were as follows:
Without any known installations, empirical data on the safety of DLT interchanges is currently unavailable. The DLT interchange and the conventional interchange both have 26 conflict points. However, the DLT interchange may result in fewer crashes because conflict points are more separated.
The DLT interchange design should be considered in situations where the following conditions are present:
The DLT interchange offers benefits over a conventional diamond interchange with its efficient and simplified two-phase operation resulting in expected increased capacity, reduced delay, and separated conflict points. At the time of this report, there were no known implementations of DLT interchanges. More details can be found in the full AIIR report available from the Federal Highway Administration.
|Researchers-This study was
performed by Principal Investigators Warren Hughes and Ram
Jagannathan. For more information about this research, contact Joe
Bared, FHWA Project Manager, HRDS-05 at (202) 493-3314, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Distribution-This TechBrief is being distributed according to a standard distribution. Direct distribution is being made to the Divisions and Resource Center.
Availability-This TechBrief may be obtained from the FHWA Product Distribution Center by e-mail to email@example.com, fax to (814) 239-2156, phone to (814) 239-1160, or online at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/research/tfhrc/offices/safety/.
Key Words-Displaced left-turn interchange, DLT, Continuous flow interchange, CFI, and Alternative interchange.
Notice-This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document.
Quality Assurance Statement-The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve the Government, industry, and public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.