U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-14-057    Date:  February 2018
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-14-057
Date: February 2018

 

Safety Evaluation of Access Management Policies and Techniques

REFERENCES

  1. Stover, V.G. (2007, revised 2009). Access Management Techniques and Practices: A Toolbox for the Practitioner, Teach America. Available online: www.teachamerica.com, last accessed 2010.

  2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2011). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6th Edition, AASHTO, Washington, DC.

  3. Gluck, J.S., Levinson, H.S., and Stover, V. (1999). Impact of Access Management Techniques, NCHRP Report 420. National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  4. Transportation Research Board. (1996). Transportation Research Circular 456: Driveway and Street Intersection Spacing, figure 4, p. 16. National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  5. Florida Department of Transportation. (2006). Median Handbook (Interim Version), Systems Planning Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL. Available online: www.dot.state.fl.us/planning, last accessed September 6, 2017.

  6. Bonneson, J.A. and McCoy, P.T. (1997). NCHRP Report 395: Capacity and Operational Effects of Midblock Left-Turn Lanes, National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  7. Potts, I.B., Harwood, D.W., Torbic, D.J., Richard, K.R., Gluck, J.S., Levinson, H.S., Garvey, P.M., and Ghebrial, R.S. (2004). NCHRP Report 524: Safety of U-Turns at Unsignalized Median Openings, National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  8. Gluck, J.S. and Levinson, H.S. (2000). The Relationship Between Access Density and Accident Rates: Comparisons of NCHRP Report 420 and Minnesota Data, NCHRP Research Results Digest 247, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  9. Huffman, C. and Poplin, J. (2002). The Relationship Between Intersection Density and Vehicular Crash Rate on the Kansas State Highway System, Kansas Department of Transportation and Kansas University.

  10. Eisele, W.L. and Frawley, W.E. (2005). “Estimating the Safety and Operational Impact of Raised Medians and Driveway Density: Experiences from Texas and Oklahoma Case Studies,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1931, pp. 108–116, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  11. Schultz, G.G., Braley, K.T., and Boschert, T. (2008). Correlating Access Management With Crash Rate, Severity, and Collision Type, Presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  12. Rakha, H. Flintsch, A.M., Arafeh, M., Gomaa, A.S., Dua, D., and Abbas, M. (2008). Access Control Design on Highway Interchanges, Report No. VTRC 08-CR7, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA.

  13. Hallmark, S., Plazak, D., Fitzsimmons, E., Hoth, K., and Isebrands, H. (2008). Toolbox to Assess Tradeoffs Between Safety, Operations, and Air Quality for Intersection and Access Management Strategies: Final Report, Iowa State University: Center for Transportation Research and Education; Federal Highway Administration; Midwest Transportation Consortium.

  14. Kach, B. (1992). The Comparative Accident Experience of Directional and Bidirectional Signalized Intersections, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI.

  15. U.S. Geological Survey. (2006). “USGS High Resolution State Orthoimagery for Wake County, North Carolina.” U.S. Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, SD.

  16. Google®. “Basic Roadway Characteristics.” Map. Google® Earth™. Fremont, California. Available online: https://www.google.com/maps/@37.5429723,-121.9281089,95m/data=!3m1!1e3, last accessed December 1, 2013.

  17. U.S. Geological Survey. (2009). “National Agriculture Imaging Program (NAIP) Orthoimagery for Zone 11 California State.” USDA-FSA-APFO Aerial Photography Field Office, Salt Lake City, UT.

  18. Hauer, E. and Bamfo, J. (1997). “Two Tools for Finding What Function Links the Dependent Variable to the Explanatory Variables,” in Proceedings of ICTCT 97 Conference, Lund, Sweden.

  19. Hauer, E. (1997). Observational Before–After Studies in Road Safety—Estimating the Effect of Highway and Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety. Elsevier Science, Incorporated. Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  20. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). Highway Safety Manual, 1st Edition, AASHTO, Washington, DC.

  21. CMF Clearinghouse. www.cmfclearinghouse.org

  22. Persaud B., Gross, F., and Lyon, C. (2011). “Safety Effects of Access Management Techniques: State of Knowledge and Recent Research,” Presented at the 1st International Conference on Access Management, Athens, Greece.

  23. Mauga, T. and Kaseko, M. (2010). “Modeling and Evaluating the Safety Impacts of Access Management (AM) Features in the Las Vegas Valley,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2171, pp. 57–65, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

 

 

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101