Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study: Experiment 4—Preferred Following Distance and Performance in An Emergency Event

REFERENCES

1. Jones, S. (2013). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Human Factors Analysis, Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-045, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
   
   
2. Nowakowski, C., et al. (2010). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Testing Drivers’ Choices of Following Distances, Report No. UCB-ITS-PRR-2011-01, California PATH Program, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkley, CA.
   
   
3. Koziol, J., et al. (1999). Evaluation of the Intelligent Cruise Control System, Volume I—Study Results and Volume II—Appendices, Report No. DOT-VNTSC-NHTSA-98-3, National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
   
   
4. Xiong, H. and Boyle, L.N. (2012). “Drivers’ Adaptation to Adaptive Cruise Control: Examination of Automatic and Manual Braking,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13, pp. 1468–1473.
   
   
5. Yerkes, R.M. and Dodson, J.D. (1908). “The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit Formation,” Journal of Comparative Neurology & Psychology, 18, pp. 459-482.
   
   
6. Inman, V.W., Jackson, S., and Philips, B.H. (2016). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study: Experiment 1—Workload, Distraction, Arousal, and Trust, Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-056, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
   
   
7. Taieb-Maimon, M. and Shinar, D. (2001). “Minimum and Comfortable Driving Headways: Reality Versus Perception,” Human Factors, 43, pp. 159–172.
   
   
8. Kennedy, R., Lane, N., Berbaum, K., and Lilienthal, M. (1993). “Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method of Quantifying Simulator Sickness,” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, pp. 203–220.
   
   
9. Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E. (1988). “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research,” Advances in Psychology, 52, pp. 139–183.