Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the FHWA Exploratory Advanced Research Program under contract DTFH61-13-D-00024.

References

1. Inman, V.W., Jackson, S., and Philips, B.H. (2016). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study: Experiment 1—Workload, Distraction, Arousal, and Trust, Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-056, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
   
   
2. Balk, S.A., Jackson, S., and Philips, B.H. (2016). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study: Experiment 2—Merging Behavior, Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-057, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
   
   
3. Inman, V.W., Jackson, S., and Philips, B.H. (2016). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study: Experiment 3—The Role of Automated Braking and Auditory Alert in Collision Avoidance Response, Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-058, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
   
   
4. Balk, S.A., Jackson, S., and Philips, B.H. (2017). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study: Experiment 4—Preferred Following Distance and Performance in an Emergency Event, Report No. FHWA-HRT-17-024, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
   
   
5. Jones, S. (2013). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Human Factors Analysis, Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-045, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
   
   
6. Shladover, S.E., Nowakowski, C., Lu, X.-Y, and Hoogedoom, R. (2014). Using Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) to Form High-Performance Vehicle Streams, Report No. UCB-ITS-PRR-2014-7, California Path, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
   
   
7. Koziol, J., et al. (1999). Evaluation of the Intelligent Cruise Control System: Volume I—Study Results, Report No. DOT-VNTSC-NHTSA-98-3, National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
   
   
8. Xiong, H. and Boyle, L.N. (2012). “Drivers’ Adaptation to Adaptive Cruise Control: Examination of Automatic and Manual Braking,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13, pp. 1,468–1,473, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ.
   
   
9. Mercedes-Benz. S Class 2013. Available online: http://www.mbusa.com/vcm/MB/ DigitalAssets/pdfmb/brochures/2014-S-Class.pdf, last accessed June 20, 2016.
   
   
10. Yerkes, R.M. and Dodson, J.D. (1908). “The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit Formation,” Journal of Comparative Neurology & Psychology, 18, pp. 459–482, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
    
    
11. Endsley, M.R. (1995). “Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems,” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37, pp. 32–64, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    
    
12. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA Ames Research Center Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Available online: http//humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX/ downloads/TLX_pappen_manual.pdf, last accessed June 20, 2016.
    
    
13. Taieb-Maimon, M. and Shinar, D. (2001). “Minimum and Comfortable Driving Headways: Reality Versus Perception,” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43, pp. 159–172, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    
    
14. Hydén, C. (1987). The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden.
    
    
15. Brown, T.L. (2005). Adjusted Minimum Time-to-Collision (TTC): A Robust Approach to Evaluating Crash Scenarios, pp. 40–48, Driving Simulation Conference 2005 North America, Orlando, FL.
    
    
16. Nowakowski, C., et al. (2011). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Testing Drivers’ Choices of Following Distances, Report No. UCB-ITS-PRR-2011-01, California Path, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
    
    
17. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.