Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram
Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
HEP Events Guidance Publications Glossary Awards Contacts

USFS R3 Road Easement Policy

United States Department of Agriculture
Forest Service - Southwestern Region

File Code: 2730
Route To:

517 Gold Avenue SW.
Albuquerque, NM 87102-0084
FAX: (505) 842-3800
V/TTY: (505) 842-3292

Date: 31 January 1997

Subject: R3 Road Easement Policy

To: Forest Supervisors

Enclosed is the Region's policy (7 pages) for Department of Transportation (DOT) and Forest Road and Trail Act (FRTA) road easements crossing NFS lands. This direction is in response to the State DOT and Counties expressing concern over differences in Forest Service administration of easements between Forests, and in some cases, between Districts on the same Forest.

Our initial intent was to also address RS-2477 Rights-of-Way (R/W). However, recent court decisions, pending legislation, and ongoing consultation between OGC and the WO are questioning how RS-2477 Rights-of-way have been handled. As a result, the RS-2477 R/W policy for R3 will be addressed as a separate issue. The 1997 Program of Work in RO lands includes developing and implementing Regional policy for determining RS-2477 status and the administration of those R/Ws recognized as outstandin rights. A draft of the Regional RS-2477 policy is scheduled to be completed by the fourth quarter of FY 1997. Currently, Forests should accept assertions made by Counties and States and submit them to RO Lands for review.

One of our goals in developing thispolicy was to delegate approval authority, where possible, to States and Counties for environmental and other areas on FRTA easements. Unfortunately, current laws and regulations do not allow us to do this. States and Counties may perform on-the-ground work, but the FS remains the Federal Land Manager responsible for approval authority for compliance with NEPA and all other laws and regulations.

We will continue to look for ways to streamline processes through Memorandums of Understanding and Programmatic Agreements (PA). Currently, a PA is being developed in Arizona to address how FHWA, the State, and various agencies will coordinate to reduce duplicated effort and efficiently meet legal requirements in the cultural resources area for DOT easements.

The primary focus of this direction is three-fold: consistency in FS administration, clarification in policy direction and interpretation, and identification of opportunities for work reduction. This policy is to be implemented immediately.

If you have questions or need further clarification, please contact Doug Salyer (L&M), Judy Propper (RN) or Bill Woodward (ENG).

/s/
CHARLES W. CARTWRIGHT, JR.
Regional Forester

Enclosure
cc:
Director, L&M
Director, RN
Director, ENG
Director, EMP
D.Salyer, L&M
J.Propper, RN
B.Woodward, ENG
H.Hollis, WL

R3 Easement Policy Swnmary for Public Roads
(01/23/1997)

I. DEFINITIONS

Public Road: Any road under the jurisdiction of and maintained by a public road authority and open to public travel (23 USC 101).

Public Road Authority (PRA): State, County, Municipality or other local government with the authority to finance, build, operate or maintain highway facilities (23 USC 101)

Open to Public Travel: The road is available (except during scheduled periods, extreme weather or emergency conditions), passable by standard passenger cars and open to the general public for use without restriction other than size, weight or class of registration (23 CFR 660.103).

Rights-of-Way: Land authorized to be used or occupied for constructior, operation, maintenance and termination of a project or facility passing over, upon, under or through such land (36 CFR 251.52). (In the case of road easement, the phrase "passing over, upon, under or through" means overpass, crossing, underpass or tunnel.)

Easement: A special-use authorization for a right-of-way that conveys a conditioned interest (stipulation) in National Forest System (NFS) land (FSH 2709.12).

Highway Easement: Land area set aside for construction, operation, and maintenance (including future minor improvements) of a highway described by sidelines of variable width that are generally parallel to the road centerline, and include construction limits as well as undisturbed land.

Except for unusual circumstances, the sidelines of a variable width right-of-way should parallel the centerline and extend a minimum of 250 feet before changing width from centerline (23 CFR 645.207 & 750.103, FSM 2709.12, 21.3). The shaded area of Exhibit 1, page 6, defines a highway easement boundary.

Department of Transportation (DOT) Easement: An easement issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to a PRA for a Federal-Aid road or Forest Highway crossing NFS lands (FSM 2731).

Forest Road and Trail Act (FRTA) Easement: An easement issued by the FS to a PRA for a non-Federal-Aid road or non-Forest Highway crossing NFS lands (FSM 2732).

Operation and Maintenance: Standard highway-related preservation activities to ensure a continued safe and efficient highway for the public (23 CFR 460, 625, 635, 771). These activities include but are not limited to: emergency repairs; restoration of surfacing, shoulders, roadsides; restoration or replacement of all structures (including bridges); cleaning ditches and cross-drainage; minor (less than 100 feet in length) slope flattening for erosion mitigation, snow removal, sight distance or other safety reasons; controlling brush and roadside vegetation to maintain clear zones, sightdistance and to remove hazard trees; slope stabilization & scaling; removal of hazards & other obstructions; preserving and adding traffic

control measures to conform with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.(MUTCD), etc. These activities are approved in the easement and do not require an additional NEPA decision. HOWEVER, COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS IS REQUIRED.

Rehabilitation: Minor reconstruction. Non-standard highway-related operation and maintenance activities to provide minor upgrades to a highway (23 CFR 625, 635, 771). These activities include but are not limited to: minor realignment (ie., straightening dangerous curves); minor widening (adding lane and/or shoulder width); adding auxiliary lanes (passing, turning, climbing, parking, etc.); major (more than 100 feet in length) slope flattening for erosion mitigation, snow removal, sight distance or other safety reasons; etc. Additional NEPA is required for this type of work. A CE may be sufficient in most cases. Compliance with other laws and regulations is also required.

II. AUTHORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

A. DOT Easements (Federal-Aid and Title 23 Highways):

The FHWA is generally the lead agency for preparing necessary NEPA documents. The Forest Service is generally a cooperating agency, unless designated as lead by FHWA. The FHWA is responsible for the NEPA decision on the project. No NEPA decision by the FS is needed for establishing or adding to DOT easements. FHWA has authority (23 USC 317) to appropriate NFS lands for highway purposes. However, if the proposed action requires a significant amendment to the Forest Plan, a FS planning decision in accordance with NEPA is required and that decision is appealable under the provisions of 36 CFR 217.

In addition to NEPA, the FHWA also has responsibility for ensuring compliance with most other applicable laws and regulations. This includes the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The Forest Service remains responsible for compliance with the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA).

The FS generally consents to the FHWA appropriation and transfer of affected NFS lands under the provisions of the Highway Act of August 27, 1958, by a Letter of Consent (LOC) (FSH 2709.12 and the 1981 FS/FHWA MOU Relating to Forest Highways on NFS Lands). The LOC does not relate to highway engineering functional items, but it does include stipulations (terms & conditions) required for project construction and for future management of the easement. These stipulations are to assure adequate protection of resources and utilization of adjacent NFS lands.

B. FRTA Easements:

The FS has authority and responsibility to make a NEPA decision on actions to allocate NFS land for the establishment of a FRTA easement, adding additional area to a FRTA easement or on projects to upgrade the standard of highway within anexisting FRTA easement. The FS is also the responsible federal agency for ensuring compliance with all other applicable laws and regulations. This responsibility cannot be delegated.

III.. DIRECTION

The FS objective is to have a FRTA or DOT easement or, where applicable, a RS 2477 Rights-of-Way on all public roads crossing NFS lands. This section deals with how projects are to be handled for public roads that have no easement, that are under special use permit or that have an existing FRTA or DOT Easement (RS 2477 Rights-of-Way direction will be handled in a separate document).

A. Roads With No Easement or Those Under Special Use Permit

Place the road under a FRTA or DOT easement as soon as possible. Place Federal-Aid and Title 23 Highways under a DOT Easement and all other roads under a FRTA Easement.

Critical Points when placing existing roa s under easement:

  1. When there is no new work being proposed, the action does not require a NEPA decision and does not require action on any other law or regulation. The construction action has already occurred, a defacto land allocation decision has already been made and the land use will remain the same.
  2. Easement width will remain the width specified under any previous permit or statute. If no previous width was described, the easement width shall, as a minimum, become the clear zone width. However, it is preferable that the easement width be established as in Exhibit 1 or 2 based on as-built plans, surveys or other methods from which viable plats can be produced.
  3. Include necessary stipulations in development of the easement. (See the Rights-of-Way and Grants Handbook, FSH 2709.12, for guidelines).
  4. New work proposals inside or outside specified Easement limits shall be handled in the same manner as discussed under B. and C. following.

B. Work Inside Existing Easements

  1. DOT Easements (Federal-Aid and Title 23 Highways):
    1. The PRA is responsible for furnishing the studies, documents, and mitigation necessary for compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The FHWA is responsible for ensuring compliance with most applicable laws and regulations, including ESA and NHPA, and for related consultation with other agencies, including the Fish and Wildlife Service and the State Historic Preservation Officer. The Forest Service is the cooperating agency, unless designated as lead by FHWA. The FS remains responsible for complian e with ARPA and NAGPRA.
    2. If FS stipulations are involved, the proposed action must be coordinated with the FS to ensure that stipulations are addressed appropriately. The FS has decision authority only on those stipulations that require FS approval prior to implementation action.
    3. Operation and maintenance activities do not require an additional NEPA decision. However, rehabilitation and reconstruction acti·vities do require an additional NEPA decision by the FHWA. Compliance with other laws and regulations is required in all cases.
    4. If the proposed action may affect FS resources outside the Easement and the FS has not reserved decision authority by stipulation, the FS must work as a cooperating agency to mitigate impacts to the extent possible.
  2. FRTA Easements:
    1. The PRA is responsible for furnishing the studies, documents and mitigation necessary to comply with applicable laws and regulations. The FS is responsible for ensuring com liance with all applicable laws and regulations and for related consultation with other agencies.
    2. If stipulations are involved, the PRA must coordinate the proposed action with the FS to ensure that stipulations are addressed appropriately. The FS has decision authority only on those stipulations that require FS approval prior to implementation action.
    3. Operation and maintenance activities do not require an additional NEPA decision. However, rehabilitation and reconstruction activities do require an additional NEPA decision by the FS. Compliance with other applicable laws and regulations is required in all cases.

C. Work Outside Existing Easements or New Project Proposals (Boundary adjustments or new easement needed)

All public roads should have easement widths developed as shown in Exhibit 1 (or Exhibit 2 if minimum Easement width statute exists). Easement width should be sufficient to permit construction and to ensure safe and efficient (FSH 2709.12, 21.3) highway operation and maintenance activities in the future.see section "C. New Project Proposals".

Minor easement adjustments can be made to existing easements with a CE if the work required disturbs less than 5 contiguous acres and there are no significant environmental, social and cultural impacts by the proposed facility. (FSH 1909.15, 31.2). Easement boundaries will be modified to include the new work areas.

  1. DOT Easements (Federal-Aid and Title 23 Highways):
    1. The PRA is responsible for furnishing the studies, documents and mitigation necessary to comply with applicable laws and regulations. The FHWA is responsible for ensuring compliance with NEPA and most other applicable laws and regulations, including ESA and NHPA. The FS is the cooperating agency, unless designated as lead by the FHWA. The FS remains responsible for compliance with ARPA and NAGPRA.
    2. These projects do not require a FS NEPA decision for NFS land allocation or to grant an easement. The FHWA can appropriate FS land for highway purposes by Statute. The FHWA issues the easement to the PRA. However, if the proposed action requires a significant amendment to the Forest Plan, a FS planning decision is cequired and that decision is appealable under the provisions of 36 CFR 217.
  2. FRTA Easements:
    1. The PRA is responsible for furnishing the studies, documents alid mitigation necessary to comply with applicable laws and regulations. The FS is responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and for related consultation with other agencies.
    2. These projects require a FS NEPA decision to allocate NFS land for highway use. This decision is appealable under 36 CFR 215 regulations unless the decision is in the CE category.

IV. MANUAL AND HANDBOOK CHANGES NEEDED

National direction to implement the above actions exists in FSMs, FSHs and MOUs with the FHWA. R3 Supplement 39 is almost 20 years old and needs some modification. It will be reviewed and rewritten as needed.

V. EXHIBITS

Exhibits 1 and 2 on pages 6 and 7 following.

This is a cross-sectional view engineering drawing that shows criteria for establishing Right-of-Way limits. In the middle of the view is a width of roadway designated by a straight line. On both sides of the roadway are slopes designated as excavation and embankment limits. Beyond those limits are construction limits and then a recommended maximum width. There is a footnote that reads 'right of way may exceed this recommended maximum width to keep the right of way boundaries parallel to the centerline and to meet the 250 foot minimum length requirement for standard sections.
This is a second example cross-sectional view engineering drawing that shows criteria for establishing Right-of-Way limits. In the middle of the view is a width of roadway designated by a straight line. On both sides of the roadway are slopes designated as excavation and embankment limits. Beyond those limits are construction limits and then a recommended maximum width. There is a footnote that reads 'right of way may exceed this recommended maximum width to keep the right of way boundaries parallel to the centerline and meet minimum state statute.
Updated: 11/12/2021
HEP Home Planning Environment Real Estate
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000