Formulas, Takedowns, and Setasides
 
| Current Law | Administration Proposal H.R. 2088 & S. 1072 as Modified
 SAFETEA of 2003
 | House H.R. 3 as Passed House
 TEA-LU
 | Senate H.R. 3 as Passed Senate
 SAFETEA of 2005
 | 
| Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program | 
| Comparable program is not a formula program. | Comparable program is not a formula program. | New formula program [1302] | New formula program [1810] | 
| Takedowns: | 
|  |  | None | None | 
| Formula Factors: | 
|  |  | Funds are apportioned only to States with an international land border with Canada or Mexico. | Funds are apportioned to border States, defined to be AK, AZ, CA, ID, ME, MI, MN, MT, NH, NM, NY, ND, TX, VT, WA. | 
|  |  | 20% number of incoming commercial truck crossings through land border ports of entry (POE) | 25% average annual cargo weight entering State by commercial vehicle across Canadian or Mexican border (averaged over the last 5 years for which data are available) | 
|  |  | 30% number on incoming personal vehicle and incoming bus crossings through land border POEs | 25% average trade value of cargo imported into or exported from the border State by commercial vehicle across Canadian or Mexican border (averaged over the last 5 years for which data are available) | 
|  |  | 25% total weight on incoming cargo by commercial trucks through land border POEs | 25% number of commercial vehicles annually entering the border State across Canadian or Mexican border. | 
|  |  | 25% total number of land border POEs | 25 % number of passenger vehicles annually entering the border State across the Canadian or Mexican border. | 
| Minimum Apportionment: | 
|  |  | None | 1/2% (border states only) | 
| Setasides: | 
|  |  | None | None |