U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway AdministrationU.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration

Transportation Performance Management

 

State Highway Infrastructure Report - Vermont

The information below summarizes the TPM Highway Infrastructure performance measures, which include four pavement condition measures and two bridge condition measures. Per 23 CFR 490, State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) are required to establish 2- and 4-year targets for these measures. The targets should represent the anticipated condition/performance at the mid-point and end of the 4-year performance period. State DOTs establish targets at the beginning of each 4-year performance period, and report on progress every two years. When establishing targets, State DOTs have the flexibility to use the methodology they deem most appropriate. FHWA encourages States to review data sets and trends and consider factors that may affect targets. Performance targets should be data-driven, realistic, and attainable and should align with the performance management framework and legislative intent.

The targets and discussion of basis for targets, optional adjustment of targets, progress, and planned activities were provided by the State DOT in its most recent biennial performance report. FHWA has not edited this information. It is provided to help bring context to the State DOT’s performance targets and progress. The data in the tables and graphs is from the biennial performance report or HPMS data submittal as noted below each measure summary. Any questions about the information should be directed to the State DOT.

Data reported by State DOTs was collected in the previous year, representing the condition/performance at the time of collection. Thus, in the tables and graphs below, FHWA labels data with the year representing the condition/performance, rather than the year the data was reported. The same thing is done for the targets--the year represents when the corresponding actual condition/performance data will be collected, not reported. More Information.

Significant Progress Determination
FHWA determines significant progress for these measures after the mid-point and end of each performance period. A State has met or made significant progress toward target achievement if “actual” condition/performance is equal to or better than the established two-year target or “actual” condition/performance is better than baseline performance 23 CFR 490.109(e). As provided in 23 CFR 490.107(b)(2)(ii)(A), baseline condition/performance is derived from the latest data collected through the beginning date of the performance period. FHWA will classify the assessment of progress toward the achievement of an individual 2-year or 4-year target as “progress not determined” if a State provides the extenuating circumstance information required in 23 CFR 490.109(e)(5), and FHWA accepts the information.

Most recent Significant Progress Determination for the Infrastructure measures

Most Recent Significant Progress Determination for all applicable measures

 

  • Interstate Pavement in Good Condition

    • Trend through 2025

      Desired trend: ↑

      Vermont % Interstate Lane Miles Good Condition


  • Interstate Pavement in Good Condition 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
    Condition/Performance 19.8 -- -- -- --
    Target -- -- 23.0 -- 28.0

  • Interstate Pavement in Good Condition

    The 2 year and 4 year targets were set by looking at current condition data, recent trends, and projected condition using expected budgets and programmed projects. Current conditions and historical trends are measured using consistent, industry-standard procedures. Projected conditions are determined from asset management system modelling of anticipated deterioration and the improvements resulting from an optimized combination of treatments at various possible funding scenarios. Targets are determined from a combination of desired conditions tempered by reasonable expectations of foreseeable funding scenarios.
  • Data Sources:
    Vermont 2022 Biennial Performance Report
    Vermont 2022 HPMS Data Submittal

  • Interstate Pavement in Poor Condition

    • Trend through 2025

      Desired trend: ↓

      Vermont % Interstate Lane Miles in Poor Condition


  • Interstate Pavement in Poor Condition 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
    Condition/Performance 1.0 -- -- -- --
    Target -- -- 4.9 -- 4.9

  • Interstate Pavement in Poor Condition

    We are currently meeting our "Poor" target and expect this to remain steady for the next performance period. Current conditions and historical trends are measured using consistent, industry-standard procedures. Projected conditions are determined from asset management system modelling of anticipated deterioration and the improvements resulting from an optimized combination of treatments at various possible funding scenarios. Targets are determined from a combination of desired conditions tempered by reasonable expectations of foreseeable funding scenarios.

  • Data Sources:
    Vermont 2022 Biennial Performance Report
    Vermont 2022 HPMS Data Submittal

  • Non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) Pavement in Good Condition

    • Trend through 2025

      Desired trend: ↑

      Vermont % Non-Interstate Lane Miles Good Condition


  • Non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) Pavement in Good Condition 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
    Condition/Performance 35.8 -- -- -- --
    Target -- -- 30.0 -- 30.0

  • Non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) Pavement in Good Condition

    The 2 year and 4 year targets were set by looking at current condition data, recent trends, and projected condition using expected budgets and programmed projects. Current conditions and historical trends are measured using consistent, industry-standard procedures. Projected conditions are determined from asset management system modelling of anticipated deterioration and the improvements resulting from an optimized combination of treatments at various possible funding scenarios. Targets are determined from a combination of desired conditions tempered by reasonable expectations of foreseeable funding scenarios.

  • Data Sources:
    Vermont 2022 Biennial Performance Report
    Vermont 2022 HPMS Data Submittal

  • Non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) Pavement in Poor Condition

    • Trend through 2025

      Desired trend: ↓

      Vermont % Non-Interstate Lane Miles Poor Condition


  • Non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) Pavement in Poor Condition 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
    Condition/Performance 7.5 -- -- -- --
    Target -- -- 9.9 -- 9.9

  • Non-Interstate National Highway System (NHS) Pavement in Poor Condition

    We are currently meeting our "Poor" target and expect this to remain steady for the next performance period. Current conditions and historical trends are measured using consistent, industry-standard procedures. Projected conditions are determined from asset management system modelling of anticipated deterioration and the improvements resulting from an optimized combination of treatments at various possible funding scenarios. Targets are determined from a combination of desired conditions tempered by reasonable expectations of foreseeable funding scenarios.

  • Data Sources:
    Vermont 2022 Biennial Performance Report
    Vermont 2022 HPMS Data Submittal

  • National Highway System (NHS) Bridges in Good Condition

    • Trend through 2025

      Desired trend: ↑

      Vermont % Deck Area in Good Condition on NHS Bridges


  • National Highway System (NHS) Bridges in Good Condition 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
    Condition/Performance 46.7 -- -- -- --
    Target -- -- 35.0 -- 35.0

  • National Highway System (NHS) Bridges in Good Condition

    These targets continue to be appropriate based on performance history and bridge management system analysis at the anticipated investment levels. Vermont anticipates expanding its preservation treatments to preserve the condition of good bridges. Current conditions and historical trends are measured using consistent, industry-standard procedures. Projected conditions are determined from asset management system modelling of anticipated deterioration and the improvements resulting from an optimized combination of treatments at various possible funding scenarios. Targets are determined from a combination of desired conditions tempered by reasonable expectations of foreseeable funding scenarios.

  • Data Sources:
    Vermont 2022 Biennial Performance Report
    Vermont 2022 NBI Data Submittal

  • National Highway System (NHS) Bridges in Poor Condition

    • Trend through 2025

      Desired trend: ↓

      Vermont % Deck Area in Poor Condition on NHS Bridges


  • National Highway System (NHS) Bridges in Poor Condition 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
    Condition/Performance 3.4 -- -- -- --
    Target -- -- 6.0 -- 6.0

  • National Highway System (NHS) Bridges in Poor Condition

    These targets continue to be appropriate based on performance history and bridge management system analysis at the anticipated investment levels. Current conditions and historical trends are measured using consistent, industry-standard procedures. Projected conditions are determined from asset management system modelling of anticipated deterioration and the improvements resulting from an optimized combination of treatments at various possible funding scenarios. Targets are determined from a combination of desired conditions tempered by reasonable expectations of foreseeable funding scenarios.

  • Data Sources:
    Vermont 2022 Biennial Performance Report
    Vermont 2022 NBI Data Submittal


Significant Progress Determination

This table shows FHWA’s most recent determination for the Infrastructure performance measures.

PLEASE NOTE: Each State’s performance target assessment is based on its own State-specific target methodology and program philosophy. Therefore, conclusions should not be drawn based only on the information in the Significant Progress Determination Results table. FHWA understands that each State’s program is unique and therefore does not prescribe a methodology for States to set targets. States have the flexibility to use the methodology they deem most appropriate when setting their performance targets. 

Vermont 2022 Full Performance Period Significant Progress Determination Results
Measure Area Measures Baseline Target Actual Better
than
Baseline?
Achieved Target? Made
Significant
Progress?
Consequences
[23 CFR 490.109(f)]
The condition of pavements on the Interstate System Percentage of pavements of the Interstate System in Good condition 32.91 28.0 19.8 No No No Additional Reporting
Percentage of pavements of the Interstate System in Poor condition 0.22 4.9 1.0 No Yes Yes
The condition of pavements on the National Highway System (NHS) (excluding the Interstate) Percentage of pavements of the non-Interstate NHS in Good condition Based only on IRI 67.1 --- 69.5 Yes --- Yes None
Based on Full Distress + IRI --- 30.0 35.8 --- Yes
Percentage of pavements of the non-Interstate NHS in Poor condition Based only on IRI 7.8 --- 7.2 Yes --- Yes
Based on Full Distress + IRI --- 9.9 7.5 --- Yes
The condition of bridges on the National Highway System Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Good condition 49.8 35.0 46.7 No Yes Yes None
Percentage of NHS bridges classified as in Poor condition 1.8 6.0 3.4 No Yes Yes

1 The 2-year condition/performance, in 2020 Mid Performance Period Progress Report, as the baseline condition/performance, as required in 23 CFR 490.105(e)(7)(iii).
2 Ibid.

Updated: 12/06/2023
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000