U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Conditions and Performance Report Appendix AInterstate Needs |
Conditions and Performance Chapter Listing Conditions and Performance Home Page Current Conditions and Performance Projected Conditions and Performance in 2007 Resources Needed to Maintain and Improve the Interstate System Addressing Interstate System Needs
|
Cost to Improve Compared to Projected SpendingExhibit A-18 compares the Cost to Improve Interstate Highways and Bridges identified in Exhibit A16 with the projected 10-year capital expenditures on Interstates identified in Exhibit A-6. The gaps between projected spending and this level of investment are identified in the second to last column, while the last column shows the additional resources above projected levels that would be required to close the gaps. Exhibit A-18. 1998-2007 Cost to Improve Interstates Compared to Projected Interstate Spending Overall, the Cost to Improve Interstate Highways and Bridges is 79.4 percent ($100.0 billion over 10 years) above the level of projected Interstate spending. As in the case for the Cost to Maintain, bridge spending would need to increase by a larger percentage than highway spending in order to close the gap. However, unlike the Cost to Maintain, the gap for widening ($32.2 billion over 10 years) is larger than the gap for highway preservation (16.0 billion over 10 years). The implication of this is that at lower levels of funding, the HERS model would recommend investing a greater share of available resources in system preservation, rather than widening. However, if funding levels increased, there are a significant number of cost-beneficial widening projects that HERS would recommend funding.
|
||
|