Skip to contentUnited States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home
Research Home
Report
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-11-046
Date: June 2011

Performance Evaluation of One-Coat Systems for New Steel Bridges

CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSIONS

  • Although some of the one-coat systems demonstrated promising performance, none of them performed as well as the three-coat system in ALT and the outdoor exposure conditions.

  • HRCSA performed well in both ALT and outdoor exposures. While HRCSA is limited by its tenderness for a significant amount of time after application, it presents an interesting alternative for maintenance applications on existing structures.

  • Several of the one-coat systems showed encouraging performance in ALT and outdoor exposure conditions in terms of surface failures and rust creepage. GFP and the HBAC were among the better performing candidates.

  • Comprehensive performance evaluation showed that the three-coat control was the best performing system, followed by HRCSA, HBAC, and WBEP.

  • The two-coat control developed a large number of coating defects in ALT and had significant gloss reduction and rust creepage in outdoor exposure conditions, resulting in a low overall ranking.

  • Regression analysis was used to determine the functional relationship between pairs of performance parameters in a specific exposure condition and exposure conditions for a specific performance parameter.

  • Color correlated with gloss in all exposure conditions, and coating defects correlated with adhesion strength variation of unscribed panels in NW.

  • NW correlated with NWS for color, gloss, and adhesion strength variations. Similarly, adhesion strength variations of unscribed panels in ME correlated with that of NWS.
ResearchFHWA
FHWA
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration