Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram
Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
HEP Events Guidance Publications Glossary Awards Contacts

Policy & Guidance

A variety of guidance documents pertaining to transportation conformity have been issued by FHWA. These documents cover a wide range of subject areas. Note that these guidance documents are not a substitute for any laws or regulations, thus do not impose legally binding requirements on EPA, DOT, states, or the regulated community. In addition, they may not apply to a particular situation based upon the circumstances. EPA and DOT retain the discretion to adopt approaches on a case-by-case basis that may differ from this guidance, but still comply with the statutes and SIP, conformity, and planning regulations. Additional transportation conformity policy and guidance documents can be found on EPA's webpage at this link.

+ Expand all

- Collapse All

Frequently Asked Questions

Air Quality Planning and SIPs

  • Transportation Conformity Alert (August 2000) - This message alerted FHWA Division staff to several issues at the time associated with various transportation conformity requirements. It covered peak and off-peak speeds, PM qualitative analysis, latest planning assumptions, motor vehicle emissions budgets in SIPs, TCMs in SIPs, and partial implementation of TCMs.
  • Limited Maintenance Plans (September 2001) - Memorandum from EPA detailing instances when moderate PM10 nonattinment areas can be redesignated to attainment with a streamlined maintenance plan.

Emissions Analysis

  • Analyzing Exempt Projects in the Conformity Process (February 1995) - This policy memo to Regional FHWA Administrators explains whether it is permissible to estimate the emissions effects of highway or transit projects which are listed as exempt projects in the transportation conformity rule and use the results of this analysis in determining conformity of the transportation plan and TIP. It also explains whether these projects lose their exempt status if an area decides to take emissions reduction credit for them in the plan/TIP conformity analysis.
  • Guidance for the Use of Latest Planning Assumptions in Transportation Conformity Determinations (December 2008) - Joint USDOT and EPA guidance to clarify expectations for implementing the transportation conformity rule's latest planning assumptions requirements.

Conformity Lapse / Grace Period

Multi-Jurisdictional (Complex) Areas

  • Court Decision on Transportation Conformity Rule (October 2006) - The U.S. Court of Appeals vacated a provision of the Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR 93.109(e)(2)(v)), a provision that allowed areas to use the interim emissions tests instead of the 1-hour budgets where the interim tests could be shown to be more appropriate for ensuring that the plan, TIP, or project would not create new violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the 8-hour standard, as determined through interagency consultation.

NAAQS and Designations

  • Transportation Conformity Alert to FHWA Divisions on PM2.5 Project-Level Conformity (November 2005) - This message alerted FHWA Division staff to transportation conformity requirement deadlines associated with the 1997 PM2.5 standard for which original designations were made on April 5, 2005. Conformity determinations for Plans/TIPs were due on April 5, 2006 and project-level conformity determinations, which may require a PM hot-spot analysis, were required after this date.

Project Level Conformity

Superseded Guidance

  • 2017 FHWA Carbon Monoxide Categorical Hot-Spot Finding (July 2017) - FHWA's 2017 carbon monoxide (CO) categorical hot-spot finding per the transportation conformity rule at 40 CFR 93.123(a)(3) for urban highway projects that include one or more intersections in CO maintenance areas, except in California. This finding is based on MOVES2014a. Project sponsors may be able to rely on the categorical hot-spot finding in place of doing their own CO hot-spot analysis as part of a project-level conformity determination in CO maintenance areas.
  • Guidance for Qualitative Project Level "Hot-Spot" Analysis in PM10 Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas (September 2001) - FHWA guidance (and accompanying examples) for conducting PM10 qualitative hot-spot analyses - note this guidance pertains only to those hot-spot analyses begun prior to March 29, 2006.
  • Interim Guidance for Implementing the Transportation Conformity Provisions in SAFETEA-LU (February 2006) - Memorandum from FHWA, FTA, and EPA concerning guidance on implementing the transportation conformity-related provisions contained in SAFETEA-LU - this interim guidance pertained to the time period before the federal transportation conformity rule was revised.
  • 2014 FHWA Carbon Monoxide Categorical Hot-Spot Finding (February 2014) - FHWA's 2014 carbon monoxide (CO) categorical hot-spot finding per the transportation conformity rule at 40 CFR 93.123(a)(3) for urban highway projects that include one or more intersections in CO maintenance areas, except in California. Project sponsors may be able to rely on the categorical hot-spot finding in place of doing their own CO hot-spot analysis as part of a project-level conformity determination in CO maintenance areas. *Note: This Finding was based on MOVES2010 which is no longer the latest emissions model for transportation conformity and SIP purposes as of October 7, 2016. Therefore, this Finding may no longer be relied upon for any CO hot-spot analyses begun after October 7, 2016

Archived Guidance

Updated: 2/2/2023
HEP Home Planning Environment Real Estate
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000