U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
SUMMARY REPORT
This summary report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  FHWA-HRT-15-067    Date:  August 2015
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-15-067
Date: August 2015

 

EXPLORATORY ADVANCED RESEARCH

Breakthroughs in Vision and Visibility for Highway Safety Workshop Summary Report - August 13-14, 2014

References

  1. Jalali, L., Talcott, C., Venkatasubramanian, N., and Mehrotra, S. (2012). “Formal Specification of Multisimulations Using Maude.” Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Theory of Modeling and Simulation—DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium, pp. 22:1–22:8, Society for Computer Simulation International, San Diego, CA.

  2. Allen, R., Park, G., Cook, M., and Fiorentino, D. (2007). “The Effect of Driving Simulator Fidelity on Training Effectiveness.” DSC 2007 North America, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Available online: https://www.nads-sc.uiowa.edu/dscna/2007/papers/Section 6A - Training/Allen.pdf, last accessed January 31, 2016.

  3. Hancock, P. and de Ridder, S. (2003). “Behavioural Accident Avoidance Science: Understanding.” Ergonomics, 46, pp. 1111–1115.

  4. Bautista, C. (2014). “New Internet Speed Record is 10 Times Faster Than Google Fiber.” Tech Times. Available online: http://www.techtimes.com/articles/10156/20140711/draft-new-internet-speed-record-10-times-faster-than-google-fiber.htm, last accessed February 27, 2016.

  5. Huang, H. et al. (2015). “Mode Division Multiplexing Using an Orbital Angular Momentum Mode Sorter and MIMO-DSP Over a Graded-Index Few-Mode Optical Fibre.” Nature: Scientific Reports, 5, pp. 14931.

  6. Gallee, G. (2015). “VR/AR & Transportation—Examples from Industry, Road Safety and Simulation Conference.” Orlando, FL. Available online: http://safersim.nads-sc.uiowa.edu/uploads/article_30/RSSS 2015 - Workshop VR-AR - Gilles GALLEE - OPTIS.PDF, last accessed February 27, 2016.

  7. Dowling, R., Skabardonis, A., and Vassili, V. (2004). Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidlines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software, Report No. FHWA-HRT-04-040, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  8. Xu, J. and Lin, Y. (2014). A Networked Multi-Drivers Simulation Platform for Interactive Driving Behavior Study, Driving Simulation Conference, Paris, France.

  9. Potuzak, T. (2007). Distributed Traffic Simulation: State of the Art and Future Research, University of West Bohemia, Plezn, Czech Republic.

  10. Ai, W., Xinsong, L., and Kejian, L. (2006). A Pure Distributed Framework for Large-Scale Microscopic Traffic Simulation, Seventh International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design, Hangzhou, China.

  11. Hou, Y., Zhao, Y., Hulme, K., Huang, S., Yang, Y., Sadek, A., and Qiao, C. (2014). “An Integrated Traffic-Driving Simulation Framework: Design, Implementation, and Validation.” Transportation Research C, 45, pp. 138–153.

  12. Camus, B., Christine, B., and Chevrier, V. (2015). Combining DEVS with Multi-Agent Concepts to Design and Simulate Multi-models of Complex Systems, Centre National de la Research Scientifique, Paris, France.

  13. Dascalu, S., Fritzinger, E., Okamoto, S., and Harris, F. (2011). “Towards a Software Framework for Model Interoperability.” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, pp. 705–710, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Lisbon, Portugal.

  14. Diallo, S., Tolk, A., Graff, J., and Barraco, A. (2011). “Using the Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model and Model-Based Data Engineering to Develop a Modular Interoperability Framework.” Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2571–2581, Winter Simulation Conference, Pheonix AZ.

  15. Jalali, L., Mehrotra, S., and Venkatasubramanian, N. (2014). “Simulation Integration: Using Multidatabase Systems Concepts.” Simulation, 90, pp. 1268–1289.

  16. Pierzchala, D. (2014). “Application of Ontology and Rough Set Theory to Information Sharing in Multi-Resolution Combat M&S.” Advanced Approachess to Intelligent Information and Database Systems, pp. 193–203, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.

  17. Siegfried, R., Luthi, J., Rother, M., and Hahn, M. (2013). Limiting Issues for True Simulation Interoperability: A Survey Done by MSG-086 and Resulting Recommendations, Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, pp. 211–221, Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, San Diego, CA

  18. Walsh, E., O’Connor, A., and Wade, V. (2013). “The FUSE Domain-Aware Approach to User Model Interoperabilty: A Comparative Study.” Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, pp. 554–561, IEEE Computer Society, San Francisco, CA.

  19. Xu, X. and Li, G. (2013). A Management and Control Infrastructure for Integrated Real-Time Simulation Environment, 2013 IEEE/ACM 17th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (DS-RT), IEEE/ACM, Delft, The Netherlands.

  20. Zhou, Q., Prasanna, V., Chang, H., and Wang, Y. (2009). A Semantic Framework for Integrated Modeling and Simulation of Transportation Systems, 12th IFAC Symposium on Control in Transportation Systems, Redondo Beach, CA.

  21. Transportation Research Board. (2007). Metropolitan Travel Forecasting: Current Practice and Future Direction, Special Report 288, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  22. Transportation Research Board. (2014). Activity-Based Travel Demand Models: A Primer, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_S2-C46-RR-1.pdf, last accessed September 23, 2016.

  23. Transportation Research Board. (2011). Dynamic Traffic Assignment: A Primer, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Available online: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec153.pdf, last accessed September 23, 2016.

  24. Fisher, D., Rizzo, M., Caird, J., and Lee, J. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine and Psychology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

  25. Fisher, D.L., Mourant, R., and Rizzo, M. (2005). Development of Standardized Descriptions of Driving Simulator Scenarios: Human Factors Considerations, Committee on Simulation and Measurement of Vehicle and Operator Performance and the International Simulator Users Group, Washington, DC.

  26. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. (2013). “Fatality Facts 2012: Older People.” (web page) Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, VA. Available online: http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/t/older-drivers/fatalityfacts/older-people, last accessed January 21, 2016.

  27. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2009). Traffic Safety Facts: 2008 Data, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811162.PDF, last accessed January 26, 2016.

  28. Muhlbacher, D., Zimmer, J., Fischer, F., and Kruger, H.-P. (2011). “The Multidriver Simulator—A New Concept of Driving Simulation for the Analysis of Interactions Between Several Drivers.” Human Centered Automation, pp. 147–258, Shaker Publisher, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

  29. Federal Highway Administration. (2007). Drivers’ Evaluation of the Diverging Diamond Interchange, Report No. FHWA-HRT-07-048, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/07048/07048.pdf, last accessed January 31, 2016.

  30. Katsikopoulos, K., Duse-Anthony, Y., Fisher, D., and Duffy, S. (2000). “The Framing of Drivers’ Route Choices When Travel Time Information is Provided Under Varying Degrees of Cognitive Load,” Human Factors, 42, pp. 470–481.

  31. Yasar, A., Berbers, Y., and Preuveneers, D. (2008). A Computational Analysis of Driving Variations on Distributed Multiuser Driving Simulators, IASTED International Conference on Modeling and Simulatoin, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

  32. Cai, H., Lin, Y., and Cheng, B. (2010). “Mimicking Human Driver Behavior for Realistic Simulation of Traffic Flow.” International Journal of Simulation and Process Modeling, 6, pp. 126–136.

  33. Bonsall, P. (2004). “Route Choice Simulators.” Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks, pp. 167–191, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York, NY.

  34. Department of Transportation. (2015). Beyond Traffic: 2045: Trends and Choices, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Available online: https://www.transportation.gov/sites /dot.gov/files/docs/Draft_Beyond_Traffic_Framework.pdf, last accessed January 28, 2016.

  35. Sawyer, B. and Hancock, P. (2012). “Development of a Linked Simulation Network to Evaluate Intelligent Transportation System Vehicle to Vehicle Solutions.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 2316–2320, SAGE, Boston, MA.

  36. Federal Highway Administration. (2007). Highway Safety Information System: An Examination of Fault, Unsafe Driving Acts, and Total Harm in Car-Truck Collisions, Report No. FHWA-HRT-04-085, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: http://www.fhwa .dot.gov/publications/research/safety/humanfac/04085, last accessed January 31, 2016.

  37. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2015). “Bicyclists and Other Cyclists.” Traffic Safety Facts: 2013 Data, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC. Available online: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/812151.pdf, last accessed January 31, 2016.

  38. Dommes, A., Cavallo, V., Dubuisson, J., Tournier, I., and Vienne, F. (2014). “Crossing a Two Way Street: Comparison of Young and Old Pedestrians.” Journal of Safety Research, 50, pp. 27–34.

  39. Gomez, R., Samuel, S., Gerardino, R., Romoser, M., Collura, J., Knodler, M., and Fisher, D. (2011). “Do Advance Yield Markings Increase Safe Driver Behaviors at Unsignalized, Marked Midblock Crosswalks: A Driving Simulator Study.” Transporation Research Record, 2264, pp. 27–33, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  40. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2010). IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA)—Framework and Rules, Standard 1516-2010, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY.

  41. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2012). IEEE Standard for Distributed Interactive Simulation—Application Protocols, Standard 1278.1-2012, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY.

 

About the Exploratory Advanced Research Program

FHWA's Exploratory Advanced Research (EAR) Program focuses on long-term, high-risk research with a high payoff potential. The program addresses underlying gaps faced by applied highway research programs, anticipates emerging issues with national implications, and reflects broad transportation industry goals and objectives.

To learn more about the EAR Program, visit the EAR Web site at www.fhwa.dot.gov/advancedresearch. The site features information on research solicitations, updates on ongoing research, links to published materials, summaries of past EAR Program events, and details on upcoming events.

FHWA-HRT-16-075
HRTM-30/12-17(WEB)E

 

 

Return to top

Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | Web Policies & Notices | No Fear Act | Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse | U.S. DOT Home | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101